Cybersecurity architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Jul 1, 2025
As a technical professional, I am not aware of the exact price details, but I know that specific products are more costly than Azure or AWS WAF ( /products/aws-waf-reviews ).
Head of Digital Engineering, Management Consultant at Stax Inc.
Real User
Top 5
Jan 16, 2025
The pricing is okay at the moment. Sometimes, when opting for a higher SKU, it's not the WAF itself that's costly but the additional requirements. A higher SKU application hosting platform adds to the cost. However, this is reasonable given the use of other services within Azure.
The price is reasonable. It is approximately $2,000 US per month. This cost is one of the main reasons why we selected Azure Web Application Firewall. It provides enough functionality for our needs.
Learn what your peers think about Azure Web Application Firewall. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
For now, we have a prime account. We have to see what pricing will be based on what we deploy and how it's done. A regular license fee looks better than AWS just in terms of simplicity.
Azure Web Application Firewall provides strong protection, easy setup, and smooth integration with Microsoft services. It excels in request filtering, custom rule creation, and protection against OWASP Top 10 attacks, ensuring scalable and reliable performance for businesses.Azure Web Application Firewall offers flexible, affordable, and efficient protection against critical security threats like DDoS and SQL injection, with seamless integration with Azure tools, analytics, and AI...
I would place Azure Web Application Firewall at an eight on a scale from one to 10, with one being cheap and 10 being expensive.
As a technical professional, I am not aware of the exact price details, but I know that specific products are more costly than Azure or AWS WAF ( /products/aws-waf-reviews ).
The pricing is okay at the moment. Sometimes, when opting for a higher SKU, it's not the WAF itself that's costly but the additional requirements. A higher SKU application hosting platform adds to the cost. However, this is reasonable given the use of other services within Azure.
You get what you pay for, and it is very much worth the price. It is even a lower cost compared to AWS and GCP.
The price is reasonable. It is approximately $2,000 US per month. This cost is one of the main reasons why we selected Azure Web Application Firewall. It provides enough functionality for our needs.
I do not handle licensing. That is not part of my job.
The pricing is quite high. It's not cheap. The free version doesn't have the capability a user would need.
Azure WAF's pricing is what differentiates the solution from the others. I give the pricing a nine out of ten.
In Brazil, they offer decent terms for contracts with large enterprises, so I think the price is reasonable.
I don't deal with the pricing of the cost of the solution. I'm not sure how the licensing works.
For now, we have a prime account. We have to see what pricing will be based on what we deploy and how it's done. A regular license fee looks better than AWS just in terms of simplicity.
The price is for this solution is fair and there is a license needed.
We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft and the pricing is good.