I rate FireEye Endpoint Security eight out of 10. Explore the solution and see what benefits it can offer your organization. I recommend FireEye depending on the customer's needs and use cases.
We're customers. We're an international conglomerate. They are our vendor, and they are partners with us on our security journey. I'd advise people to use Managed Defense. It pays for itself. I'd rate the solution a solid eight out of ten overall.
Make a really detailed survey of all the systems before implementing any solution on the endpoint. Do not buy the license and try deployment after that. I would rate it a 10 out of 10.
Cyber Defense Advisor | Founder Executive at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
2022-02-21T09:43:20Z
Feb 21, 2022
Organizations trying to or going for the FireEye solution should understand that they won't be able to see under the hood or what is happening within the product. FireEye is quite a black box solution. Understanding why certain findings got a particular verdict is not easy. If you want well-automated operations and you don't have an advanced operations team that wants to check the verdicts and understand how the product is working and making decisions, then it is good for you. If you have proper engineering skills on board and your operations teams want to understand the basic logic within the product that they are using on a daily basis, this might not be the best product for you. I would rate it an eight out of 10.
Learn what your peers think about Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
IT Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-11-16T18:55:50Z
Nov 16, 2021
We are just customers and end-users of the product. We don't have a special business relationship with the company. I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using. I don't know the version number off-hand. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. I'd recommend the solution to other users and organizations.
I would not recommend this solution to others. However, if you have a small budget then this solution could be a second option. I rate FireEye Endpoint Security an eight out of ten.
Sr Manager - Information Security & Researcher at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2021-05-25T16:00:34Z
May 25, 2021
Based on my two years of experience with this solution, I would comfortably recommend this solution. I would rate FireEye Endpoint Security an eight out of ten.
Manager at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2021-02-02T17:08:00Z
Feb 2, 2021
I would recommend to check how they might pull reports. For example, where the customer modes fall because it's an independent investigation related to an IP. On a scale of one to ten, I would give FireEye Endpoint Security a ten, because it's the only good option.
Technical Manager (SOC Operations) at Novac Technology Solutions
Real User
Top 5
2020-08-30T08:33:50Z
Aug 30, 2020
If you are deploying on Windows or Mac, there will be minimal issues, and you can go for this solution. With Linux, you need to understand a few features. What you expect from Windows and Mac is not available in Linux. If your main technologies are open source, then probably rethink about FireEye Endpoint Security. You can go for FireEye Endpoint Security after they have the same capabilities in Linux. Most of the features are there in their roadmap. We mostly faced issues with Linux support. In the past, we also had issues related to communication between an agent and an endpoint where they didn't communicate, the communication got stopped automatically, or the data communication time didn't sync properly. In the later versions, they improved and resolved these issues. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. It's gradually growing, and a few features that we require are not there. If these requirements are satisfied, I would rate them nine or ten.
Information Technology Security Architect at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2019-08-05T06:24:00Z
Aug 5, 2019
I like FireEye products, and they have a huge portfolio for this solution. However, this is not a magic bullet where you can install it and your problems will disappear. The problem is with the people, rather than the tool. From my perspective, you can install every tool, but you need to have a security operations team involved in the process of analyzing, sorting, and eliminating threats. When we started our project, we had very few people and we have realized that this had to change. The system without human intervention is useless. We needed to build more complex security operation centers to handle false positives, the triage process, and eliminating threats. The biggest lesson that I have learned from this solution is that people need to be ready and the business needs to be ready to use it. This is not a toy. It is a very mature solution to protect the internals of the organization and it should be treated in this way. This is not the worse product that I have seen. I've seen many, many bad products. At the same time, this is not the best product that I have seen. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Executive Officer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2019-03-11T07:21:00Z
Mar 11, 2019
First, implement it. Then, see what is going on in your company. You will see that there are many risks which you have never seen. The product is not bad, but there may be somethings that need to be modified. The solution is very precise for detecting risks, but the operational quality has some issues.
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.
It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive...
I rate FireEye Endpoint Security eight out of 10. Explore the solution and see what benefits it can offer your organization. I recommend FireEye depending on the customer's needs and use cases.
We're customers. We're an international conglomerate. They are our vendor, and they are partners with us on our security journey. I'd advise people to use Managed Defense. It pays for itself. I'd rate the solution a solid eight out of ten overall.
I’d recommend the solution to others. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
Make a really detailed survey of all the systems before implementing any solution on the endpoint. Do not buy the license and try deployment after that. I would rate it a 10 out of 10.
Organizations trying to or going for the FireEye solution should understand that they won't be able to see under the hood or what is happening within the product. FireEye is quite a black box solution. Understanding why certain findings got a particular verdict is not easy. If you want well-automated operations and you don't have an advanced operations team that wants to check the verdicts and understand how the product is working and making decisions, then it is good for you. If you have proper engineering skills on board and your operations teams want to understand the basic logic within the product that they are using on a daily basis, this might not be the best product for you. I would rate it an eight out of 10.
The suitability of FireEye for a business depends on the business itself. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
We are just customers and end-users of the product. We don't have a special business relationship with the company. I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using. I don't know the version number off-hand. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. I'd recommend the solution to other users and organizations.
I would not recommend this solution to others. However, if you have a small budget then this solution could be a second option. I rate FireEye Endpoint Security an eight out of ten.
Based on my two years of experience with this solution, I would comfortably recommend this solution. I would rate FireEye Endpoint Security an eight out of ten.
I would recommend to check how they might pull reports. For example, where the customer modes fall because it's an independent investigation related to an IP. On a scale of one to ten, I would give FireEye Endpoint Security a ten, because it's the only good option.
If you are deploying on Windows or Mac, there will be minimal issues, and you can go for this solution. With Linux, you need to understand a few features. What you expect from Windows and Mac is not available in Linux. If your main technologies are open source, then probably rethink about FireEye Endpoint Security. You can go for FireEye Endpoint Security after they have the same capabilities in Linux. Most of the features are there in their roadmap. We mostly faced issues with Linux support. In the past, we also had issues related to communication between an agent and an endpoint where they didn't communicate, the communication got stopped automatically, or the data communication time didn't sync properly. In the later versions, they improved and resolved these issues. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. It's gradually growing, and a few features that we require are not there. If these requirements are satisfied, I would rate them nine or ten.
I will rate this solution an eight out of ten. In the next version I would like to see an improvement in the scalability and stability.
It offers protection from the latest threats.
I like FireEye products, and they have a huge portfolio for this solution. However, this is not a magic bullet where you can install it and your problems will disappear. The problem is with the people, rather than the tool. From my perspective, you can install every tool, but you need to have a security operations team involved in the process of analyzing, sorting, and eliminating threats. When we started our project, we had very few people and we have realized that this had to change. The system without human intervention is useless. We needed to build more complex security operation centers to handle false positives, the triage process, and eliminating threats. The biggest lesson that I have learned from this solution is that people need to be ready and the business needs to be ready to use it. This is not a toy. It is a very mature solution to protect the internals of the organization and it should be treated in this way. This is not the worse product that I have seen. I've seen many, many bad products. At the same time, this is not the best product that I have seen. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
First, implement it. Then, see what is going on in your company. You will see that there are many risks which you have never seen. The product is not bad, but there may be somethings that need to be modified. The solution is very precise for detecting risks, but the operational quality has some issues.