What advice do you have for others considering GitLab?

GitLab is a very good solution. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

I would recommend using GitLab. It provides a repository and API, allowing you to create deployment pipelines. I rate it a ten out of ten.

Overall, I would rate GitLab around eight or nine out of ten. I highly recommend it to other users for both company purposes and personal projects. GitLab provides a solid starting point for learning and working efficiently, making it a valuable tool for developers.

I am my company’s GitLab administrator. Many features we need are available in Enterprise Edition. If we say that we do not have enough features in GitLab Community Edition, GitLab might just ask us to upgrade to Enterprise Edition. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

GitLab is a product managed by the department of programmers in our company, and I am not much involved in it. I recommend the solution to those planning to use it. I rate the overall product a ten out of ten.

It's a great solution. So I would recommend it to those who want to use it. I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten.

I rate GitLab a seven out of ten.

We are using GitLab Ultimate. As a DevOps consultant, I would like to give advice some. From 2008 or 2009, when the global market started adopting DevOps, until the year 2019 or 2020, we always had a problem. If I wanted to have DevOps automation in the organization, we would require four or five tools minimum. Since GitLab in 2020 emerged as a single platform, always advise people who are implementing DevOps to always move towards a single platform. The reason is that you save a lot of money on your infrastructure costs. You also save a lot of money on the resources which are required to maintain all infrastructure for a single platform. And if you maintain a single platform, you'll require an optimized resource tool to maintain that. If you're going to have multiple tools in your infrastructure for DevOps, you require many people to maintain that. In the end, everything boils down to cost. Cost is definitely high if you need to maintain infrastructure with multiple toolchains. So my advice is always, when we talk about agility, to be lean. So when you bring in GitLab, you get a lean infrastructure; you get a simple and non-complex infrastructure. You have minimum compliance issues and minimum regulatory issues. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I rate GitLab eight out of 10. It's a good solution for DevOps and managing Ripple. It's possibly the most complete DevOps and DevSecOps platform. You can help users to make wonderful stuff with their source code and applications. GitLab supports many types of source code like Python, Ruby, etc. It's great software.

I rate GitLab a solid nine out of 10. I recommend GitLab. Based on what I've heard, I think GitLab is will be the permanent tool we'll use. I don't think that we're going to look for any other tool in the near future.

I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using. I'd rate this product nine out of ten.

GitLab is a wholly complete solution and it is for this reason that I can recommend it to other users. I would rate GitLab a nine out of ten.

The solution is valuable for developers because it includes version controlling, pipelines, CI/CD, and integrations. When moving from the development side to the production side it is important to ensure that code is bug-free with no errors. We have less issues on the production side because we take full advantage of the solution. The solution currently requires third-party integrations for CI/CD so I rate it a seven out of ten.

I'm a developer, so I write all the code from scratch, but I don't use predefined platforms. I've been using GitLab and Visual Studio, though. As GitLab is only used within my team, only five people use it. My team uses GitLab almost every day, then when a project is complete, my team pushes it back into GitHub. My team is an end-user of GitLab. Regarding recommending GitLab to others, I'm a developer of data science solutions, so I mostly do end-user tasks rather than developer tasks. As of now, nothing was so bad about GitLab, and I didn't come across any significant hardships in using the solution. For a person like me who uses resources in a bigger enterprise, there shouldn't be problems using GitLab. If you're part of a small company, there could be some issues. My rating for GitLab is seven out of ten.

I would give this solution a ten out of ten. There are a couple of caveats, but compared to other products, GitLab is certainly the leading solution in the market right now.

My advice for others looking into this product is to go for it. GitLab is the future. There are some alternates, like Stash and Bitbucket, that have the same concept, but GitLab is one of the most widely used version control systems. It's easy to use. I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten.

I would rate this solution as nine out of ten.

I rate GitLab a ten out of ten.

Overall, this is a good product that has a lot of features. There are several features that I don't use personally but other members of my team do. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I always use the latest version of GitLab. I don't check the version number. I'd recommend the solution to others. I'd rate it a ten out of ten. I'm happy with its capabilities.

I rate this solution an eight out of ten because it is a good tool.

I rate this solution a seven out of ten, and it is good for a small set of people.

It takes some time for the environment to become stable once you migrate from another solution. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

GitLab is a very good solution because you can completely maintain your code and have a number of developers working on the same project. I would recommend GitLab for those doing technology development, and I'd give it a rating of nine out of ten.

I'd recommend the solution to others. I'd rate it eight out of ten.

We are customers and end-users. As far as I know, we are using the on-premise version. There are two versions of GitLab - the on-premise and the cloud version. We are using on-premise. As far as I know, we also keep making sure it's up-to-date. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We are customers and end-users. I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I would rate it a nine out of 10.

I would recommend this solution to anyone who is interested in using it. GitLab is very good. I would rate GitLab a nine out of ten.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been very happy with the product. We're a customer and an end-user.

I would recommend this solution to others. I rate GitLab a seven out of ten.

I would recommend this solution. On a scale from one to ten, I would give GitLab an eight.

I would recommend this solution. I would rate GitLab an eight out of ten.

I would advise those wanting to implement this solution to create tutorials themselves because there are so many sources that you have to look at just to understand how to make a red blob or red marker onto the code. I rate GitLab a seven out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to others. I would rate GitLab an eight out of ten.

I would advise others to follow best practices because they are useful for each case. If you have a problem, it can be easily solved by other people if you follow the best practices. I would rate GitLab a nine out of ten.

My advice is to work on the processes that are in the environment. Know what you need to do and what you need to deliver the software. You have to ask the question: What do you need to deploy the software? Always take security into account from the beginning. While this is a good tool that is always evolving and there are new updated security standards that are being published and improved upon, it is always a good idea to have another solution to compare with to get better at using it. You can always have a combination of all of them, which would something that I would be interested in. We are always evaluating to see if there is a solution that can do the job better. You need to have a well-defined set of processes and that will help them adapt GitLab. Overall, it's a great product and it does a good job. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

In summary, this is a very good product and everything is working well. I would recommend it. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

We strive to always have the latest technology. In this business, you have to follow your client and follow the trend. In fact, you have to do things ahead of the trend and be prepared. For us, this tool is really convenient. My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to consider the paid version. Don't be afraid to pay a few dollars a year. Especially for a startup company, this tool is an investment. You don't have to look at it as an expenditure or expense. Don't think about it as spending money, but rather, investing money. From my point of view and for what I use GitLab for, it is okay for me. There may be other products, but this is a great tool. It's convenient and it's used by a million developers. The developers here consider it to be the best choice. That said, there is always room for improvement in a product. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Depending on the situation, I would recommend it. I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.

We're just a customer. We don't have a professional relationship with GitLab. We're using the latest version of the solution right now. I would definitely recommend the solution to other organizations. It's pretty easy to use and can scale if you need to. It's stable as well. We're not really missing any features. It's great. Overall, I'd rate GitLab nine out of ten. They can always improve, which is why I didn't give them a perfect score. What they are working on, based on their roadmap, is already quite impressive. We're looking forward to metrics coming down the pipeline later in the year.

I would rate GitLab an eight out of ten. GitLab provides some sort of static analysis part. That is what I understand, but I never tried it. I would like to see static analysis also embedded in GitLab. That would also help us. If there's something that it does internally by GitLab and then that is already tied up with your pipeline and then it can tell you that you're coding is good or your code is not great. Based on that, it would pass or fail. That should be streamlined. I would think that would help to a greater extent, in terms of having one solution rather than depending on multiple vendors.

We use the public cloud deployment model. I would rate the solution nine out of ten.