What advice do you have for others considering JIRA Service Management?

New users should consider tools that are not only feature-rich but also easy to use. Many providers offer robust features, so the ease of use should be a deciding factor. I would rate JIRA Service Management a seven overall.

Users should use the end-to-end tools related to project management. It is very useful in project management. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

I recommend Jira Service Management. It helps with time management and team management of the new tasks. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

The most time-consuming part of the setup process is learning how to customize workflows. It is crucial to thoroughly read and understand all documentation and materials provided, which significantly aids in setting up and customizing the platform.

For a small enterprise or team, GLPI may be a suitable option due to its free version. However, for a larger, more stable, and highly improved solution, I would recommend JIRA. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

The automation capabilities of the product are limited. You cannot integrate with each and everything. Within NetSuite and Confluence, JIRA Service Management's integration capabilities are easy to manage, but with some other tools, it can get complex. The product is not easy to integrate with other tools. It is easy to integrate the product with the AI part. AI helps with tracking purposes, management purposes, reports, and project execution. The tool is used a lot, making it a very useful product. My company uses JIRA Service Management to collaborate with Confluence. I believe it is a complete package and one of the best project management tools in the market. I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I would recommend JIRA Service Management to other users. Overall, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten.

JIRA Service Management is deployed on-cloud in our organization. Overall, I rate JIRA Service Management a nine out of ten.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. It is a good tool, but it is expensive. However, it does provide the information needed to make good decisions about operational development and performance. It provides good visibility, but it is also very expensive.

If you have a large organization with complex processes and need to scale up, Jira Service Management is an excellent platform for service and development management. However, if you're looking to optimize operations, improve services through data insights, and have a large organization, I would recommend considering ServiceNow as well. Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. It's a solid solution with some room for improvement, but overall, it's a valuable product for our organization.

We have started moving into cloud deployment because Jira has discontinued the support for the on-prem servers. Moreover, we are moving to the cloud to reduce the cost. There are many users who are licensed for our on-prem server, but they are not using it. We have 1,800 employees, but out of 1,800, there are 1,000 employees using Jira on a daily basis. We are paying the cost per user. There should be licenses for frequent and infrequent users. For example, my manager logged in once in one quarter or after two months or one month, and we are paying $20 per user. If they want to save money and have the ability to make workflows by themselves, they can use it for startup companies. Startup companies should instantly go to Jira because it can help them in all departments. They won't need to buy different software for different departments, so it's better to go for Jira and make workflows for each department, which will all be using the same software. That way, they can interconnect within the departments. I rate Jira Service Management a seven out of ten.

To those planning to use it, I would say that if they have a larger customer base, which may cause them to incur some licensing costs, then that is the area where they should look at JSM as a candidate. If some want to automate their internal processes, which could be operational, business-centric, or technical operation, they can use JSM. People who can look at JSM as a candidate are those who have a little bit of asset requirement where they want to manage the instance and opt for the trace and track functionality to find out what exactly is happening and who is honing what in general. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I rate this solution eight out of 10.

Overall, I would rate the JIRA Service Management solution a six, on a scale from one to 10, where one is the worst and 10 is the best.

The administration maintenance and daily tasks are easy but need special skills and training. My advice to others is they need to be an expert to be able to administer it. I rate JIRA Service Management a ten out of ten.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I rate Jira Service Management seven out of 10. If you plan to implement Service Management, you need to be aware that you can do whatever you want with it, but you might not know the long-term effects. If you do too much automation, it could have unforeseen consequences in the long run. You need to be highly specific about your needs from the start, so you can correctly build the tool's architecture.

I rate Jira Service Management seven out of 10. The basics are good, but I'd like to see improvements in user-interface performance and scalability. Querying functionality is also limited. It would be nice if Jira allowed more advanced queries. The user interface doesn't lend itself to working concurrently, with multiple users having a conversation and using the system concurrently. Those are areas for improvement. I would rate it a 10 if it had those. But it does not. Before deploying Jira, I recommend researching the product to see if it meets your needs. Jira fits a very wide range of needs. But there are a few situations where it is not optimal, or needs to be used in an augmented way. For example, it shouldn't be used to support Scrum events directly, because the user interface doesn't lend itself to working concurrently. You need to update frequently to see changes made by others, and actions are generally sequential. If I need a solution, e.g., for a Daily Scrum, I'd much rather use something like Mural or Miro, and then have it interface with Jira. While Jira can ultimately still be used in these scenarios, as the backend, it benefits from some kind of digital whiteboard on the UI end that allows people to work concurrently with it.

I rate Jira Service Management eight out of 10. It's easy for new users to learn. A lot of the staff members are new to Jira, but it's simple to pick up and learn how all the processes work. Jira has many features, and I haven't had the opportunity to work with some of them. There are workarounds to accomplish most things you want to do with the product.

The solution is suitable for mid-sized or enterprise companies and I rate it 10 out of 10.

I would rate this solution as a six out of ten.

I'm a customer and end-user. We use a few Jira tools across the organization. It is one of the best tools in the market right now. If you are looking for any service management tool, then you have to go for it. It's easy to maintain and easy to use. The user interface is very good. If you are in a client-based organization, your client will find it more useful as you can integrate with Confluence, and then you can deflect the users to the knowledge parts. You can create your own knowledge information on Confluence, and, without creating tickets, you can redirect your client or user to Confluence. From there, they can get the information they need. It saves a lot of time for the IT team and empowers the users to do things by themselves. They do not have to follow up. They do not have to create a ticket. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We are Atlassian partners. We have a cloud version, and we have a data center as well. In the cloud, we are doing migration activities. In the coming next two years, when it comes to the server, there is no support and therefore, we're planning to completely move to migrate to the cloud. If you are using this software for the first time, I would suggest the use of the cloud instead of a data center server. I prefer to use the cloud due to the fact that, in the coming two years, the server won't have that much support. Everyone is moving to the cloud and it's developing daily. The automation is inbuilt in the cloud compared to the server as well. Of course, for automation, you will have to pay. We do find the cloud more secure and there are updates happening day by day. It's becoming more robust. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. If they improved their API integrations, I would rate it higher.

I would rate JIRA Service Management an eight out of ten.

We chose JIRA because we did not want a large platform with a lot of features. JIRA is a good platform that can be implemented quickly with a focused offering. I would rate JIRA Service Management an eight and a half out of 10 overall.

I'm just an end-user. We are on the cloud, and therefore using the latest version. They release new versions and fixes automatically and we can take advantage of them right away. Others need to be aware of how we need to use service management first. They need to know the queues and the SLAs. They need to understand the configurations also. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

This solution is good but it's not the best. Sometimes if you pay a bit more there's less pain. I rate this solution seven out of 10.

This is pricey solution. Should we move to using all cloud solutions in our business, we may move to different tools that have multiple functionality versus having a solution for each area. This would be too pricey and we would need to replace Jira with a different solution that also offers other features. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I would advise others that this solution is similar to any other service management solution. There's nothing out of the box, there is always a level of development that has to happen for it to work well. I rate JIRA Service Management an eight out of ten.

Allow customization and configuration to suit your needs. I would rate JIRA Service Management a seven out of ten.

In our roadmap for this year, we are evaluating which technologies can help us do our work quickly and increase revenue. I rate the solution eight out of 10.

I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. Sometimes the beginning of the implementation and working with custom-built workflows was a little bit difficult for regular companies. At this step, I strongly advise that they work with an Atlassian Solution Partner. Specific industries need specific solutions. Atlassian partners have a lot of experience, maybe in that specific country and in that specific company field.

Jira is becoming quite popular and is well supported. We find that when working with other companies on other projects, they are using Jira to track issues so it is beneficial for us to use the same solution. Jira has lots of modules and integrations, however too many makes licensing difficult to understand upfront and becomes quite expensive to have a full solution. I would rate Jira Service Management a 9 out of 10.

If you are a software development company you need to use JIRA because it aligns with project management. I would rate a JIRA Service Management a 9 of 10.

My company is a partner of Atlassian. While I prefer Jira over solutions such as ServiceNow, we do need to look at various options when advising clients. As an Atlassian partner, it's important to be able to look at other options and see the difference and show a client why Jira is a superior choice. Overall, I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

I would suggest looking into your current layout and requirements, evaluating them and then figuring out the best option in terms of how you want things categorized and broken down from both a customer perspective and a backend perspective before you try to build it out. Despite the few downfalls, its cost is still very good compared to other holistic systems. A big reason for getting the switch approved was that the cost was substantially lower than other solutions. I can't speak for the cloud experience, I'm sure it's a little easier than running on-prem, which is very administrator heavy when you want to do a lot of automation or post functions. It's important to be prepared for that. Depending on how your organization is set up, you're likely to need your admin to do those things. I rate the solution seven out of 10.

I'm just a customer. I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been happy with the product so far. I would recommend the solution to other users and organizations.

I would definitely recommend this solution. It is definitely not peer-to-peer in comparison with solutions like ServiceNow, but it is a pretty big software, and its feature set caters to our needs. I would rate Jira Service Management a seven out of 10.

It is free to try, so make sure you try it. The single biggest thing to look at is the licensing cost, especially if you plan to use something like Confluence, which is something you would probably want to roll out throughout the company because it is just a Wiki. If I've got two software developers and I put an add-on, having to pay 100 licenses for that is just crazy. I would rate Jira Service Desk an eight out of ten.

I would rate JIRA Service Desk a seven out of ten.

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.

On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate JIRA Service Deskaybe as maybe and eight or nine-out-of-ten. For our use case, and putting aside the need for the plugin, it is a nine.

Anyone who is considering Jira Software, I would recommend they go with Jira Service Desk. I would rate Jira Service Desk an eight out of ten.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I would rate Jira an eight out of ten. I would like for them to have automation to change the portal, it's still limited. It's not user-friendly compared with other vendors. I recommend would, of course, recommend Jira. It depends on the users. When we started, it was good for us but now that the company is growing and we have a lot of applications, a lot of servers, a lot of complexity, and a lot of links between application services, it's not perfect for us. Our infrastructure has also become huge. We have cloud, hybrid, and on-prem. Sometimes we face an issue, but we spend hours understanding where exactly. It can be small things, but no only can understand where exactly. So that's why we are looking for something that can help with this, to prevent us from raising issues, and to find a solution.

Because it is simple, you can start small and develop. You can customize more and more depending on your requirements. It's quite simple to configure. I would say start and improve. Often you have to think about everything because it will be painful later on if you need to add customization that comes with JIRA Service Desk. This is the reason that you can start in one month. It's a simpler approach. It's a good product. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

While we largely deal with cloud deployments, we did recently have a client that requested an on-premises deployment. The types of clients we have are small or medium-sized enterprises typically. On a cost-basis, the product offering is very good. Jira is very customer-centric. They really try to help users make the most out of their solution as well as other products. The plugins are all designed to make Jira even easier to use, even more user friendly, and serve to bridge the gap of features Jira might lack. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. We hear a lot of feedback from clients, and they mention the solution has some limitations.

I would rate this as nine out of ten. If they add a dashboard for management customers, it would be a ten.

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. I'd rate it higher, but it is expensive and very hard to customize.

We are resellers for this solution. I would recommend the JIRA Service desk, but there is always room for improvement. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We are using the on-premises deployment model. It's a good, stable solution. It can help open the IT Solution management backing if you're just looking to do some enhancements. I would rate the solution seven out of ten.

I think I had the opportunity to learn a few things by working with JIRA Service Desk. It has been a good solution and supports good practices, but it is not everything every company needs. I can't find a better single solution for a better approach to tracking and better customer satisfaction. I have a better picture of customer needs and gradation. I have more experience in JIRA software because I worked with it in many different companies now. Some years ago I was a Java Software developer and had a lot of experience with Scrum and agile development and we used JIRA software. I think I can speak better about JIRA software because I was a software developer. On a scale from one to ten, where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate JIRA Service Desk as a ten. For my experience, it is the best product on the market for use in enterprise installations.

My advice to others would be to use the solution as is, and not to try to perform some sophisticated solutions. If it fits to your needs, take it. If not, use another solution. I rate this solution a seven out of ten, and in the future, I would like to see better infrastructure, more scalability, better performance, load balancing and things like that.

I started using JIRA in 2016 when I joined this company. It was a new software-house-startup company. They asked me if I would like to use JIRA or any other tool. I chose to learn JIRA and not do any R&D. I was very comfortable and the team will be comfortable. We are a hiring team, so we have the authority to impose on our people. I didn't install this solution, but I use it and I configured it. What I learned is that JIRA is all about the team. If you know the tool, but you don't communicate with your team then it will not be of any benefit. On the other hand, if you want to benefit from using this solution, first you have to learn how to use the solution, and then you have to translate that to your team and teach them how to use it. I would recommend JIRA to everyone, including my friends. I am working on owning my own business and I plan to use JIRA for project management. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

When considering a solution it is best to stay as standard as possible when adopting it. The further you get off the standard path the more difficult it is to adopt or adapt to other solutions if that becomes necessary or desirable in the future. I can't actually give it a fair appreciation at this stage of the capabilities of JIRA as a stand-alone product because of the way we have implemented it in a cluster of other products. At this stage, I would give it a five out of ten. This is mostly because we rely on other products for certain services or features. If JIRA had more comprehensive coverage of what we require, or if it was easier to implement what it already does, the rating would be higher.