It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes.
The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process.
Product Owner at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-11-16T06:02:00Z
Nov 16, 2022
One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era.
Staff Software Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2022-09-04T16:32:00Z
Sep 4, 2022
The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out.
IT Solution Architect at a government with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-09-04T16:03:00Z
Sep 4, 2022
We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes.
The BPMN diagram is valuable. For our use case of transferring money from one account to another, the connections have to be done in the traditional financial ways. There are a lot of unexpected errors and a lot of instability with this kind of system, and we are using Camunda in order to have clear flows. With BPMN, I can show a flow to my business partner, and the business team can easily understand what's going on. The technical team can understand what the implementation is, and we can model different errors and the process for recovering from these errors.
The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me.
The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need.
Enterprise Architect at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Real User
2021-12-24T09:18:00Z
Dec 24, 2021
The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance.
We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well.
IT-Services Manager & Solution Architect at Stratis
Real User
2020-12-22T11:22:35Z
Dec 22, 2020
There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable.
Senior Product Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Reseller
2020-07-19T08:15:00Z
Jul 19, 2020
The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.
The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.
Senior Software Engineer at a non-profit with 201-500 employees
Real User
2019-07-16T05:40:00Z
Jul 16, 2019
The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.
Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital...
The solution is useful for small projects.
It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it.
Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products.
The graphical interface is very beneficial.
It is an absolutely stable solution.
Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy.
One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility.
The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based.
It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes.
The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs.
, Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner.
Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele.
The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process.
One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era.
The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out.
We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes.
The BPMN diagram is valuable. For our use case of transferring money from one account to another, the connections have to be done in the traditional financial ways. There are a lot of unexpected errors and a lot of instability with this kind of system, and we are using Camunda in order to have clear flows. With BPMN, I can show a flow to my business partner, and the business team can easily understand what's going on. The technical team can understand what the implementation is, and we can model different errors and the process for recovering from these errors.
We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before.
Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment.
The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me.
The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it.
The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need.
The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance.
It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen.
The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application.
The solution is good for data models.
The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now.
The flexibility is great.
Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers.
Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate.
Overall, the solution has been very solid.
We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well.
The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it.
I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite.
There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable.
We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation.
I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine.
Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model.
The most valuable feature is the scheduling.
The best feature is the automation.
Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible.
The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.
It has an open BPM
The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.
It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.
When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.
The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.
The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.
The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.
I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features.
We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users.
For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly.