Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to implement. It provides real-time data with all connected systems and relates how well they are functioning together throughout the workflows. They also have a very good mobile app.
Camunda allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very quickly. This solution is very stable with a free open-source version that is very good. The automation of this solution is great.
Appian is not as flexible as some other options and does not integrate well with the Microsoft ecosystem and other products. Appian is not very user-friendly; the tutorials and other training tools could be better. Their support response could be improved to improve productivity and reduce downtime.
Camunda can be challenging regarding the initial setup. It seems to take a long time for completed workflows to be implemented on the Camunda Platform. The learning curve for this solution can be very steep. A mobile app would be a welcome enhancement to this solution. Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved and better template options would be welcomed.
Conclusion
For simple solutions using simple models, Appian may be the best option for your organization and the most cost-effective with the best ROI. For larger, more complex enterprises, Camunda might be a better choice. At the end of the day, what you use depends on many factors, what the needs of your business are currently and will be in the future, growth projection, performance trajectory, and team member recommendations. Each of these solutions provides very good options. Your enterprise’s specific circumstances are the best determination for which solution will work best.
Appian and Camunda compete in the business process management space, focusing on organizations seeking streamlined process integration. Appian holds an advantage with its low-code approach, catering to non-developers and providing rapid deployment, whereas Camunda is favored by developers for its open-source flexibility and adherence to BPMN standards.Features: Appian provides rapid development through low-code capabilities, simplifying app deployment for non-developers and offering robust...
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to implement. It provides real-time data with all connected systems and relates how well they are functioning together throughout the workflows. They also have a very good mobile app.
Camunda allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very quickly. This solution is very stable with a free open-source version that is very good. The automation of this solution is great.
Appian is not as flexible as some other options and does not integrate well with the Microsoft ecosystem and other products. Appian is not very user-friendly; the tutorials and other training tools could be better. Their support response could be improved to improve productivity and reduce downtime.
Camunda can be challenging regarding the initial setup. It seems to take a long time for completed workflows to be implemented on the Camunda Platform. The learning curve for this solution can be very steep. A mobile app would be a welcome enhancement to this solution. Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved and better template options would be welcomed.
Conclusion
For simple solutions using simple models, Appian may be the best option for your organization and the most cost-effective with the best ROI. For larger, more complex enterprises, Camunda might be a better choice. At the end of the day, what you use depends on many factors, what the needs of your business are currently and will be in the future, growth projection, performance trajectory, and team member recommendations. Each of these solutions provides very good options. Your enterprise’s specific circumstances are the best determination for which solution will work best.