What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Exchange Online?

The pricing for Microsoft Exchange Online is quite reasonable, in my opinion. Many licensing options are available so that we can choose based on the customer's needs. For example, if a customer only requires mailbox features, we can recommend Plan One or Plan 2. We can suggest an E3 or E5 license if they need the entire Office suite. There are also premium subscriptions for enterprise customers, offering additional security features. Overall, I don't find the pricing costly because Microsoft provides many features and security capabilities, making it reliable for all customers, depending on their requirements.

The costs of this platform vary based on subscriptions, but it is generally reasonable.

We are Microsoft partners. We bought some licenses, and some are within our package or partnership with Microsoft.

Microsoft Exchange Online is very expensive. While it might seem a bit expensive, the benefits outweigh the cost for us. We wouldn't consider changing unless absolutely necessary. We pay yearly. It's roughly around $22.00 per user per year for the cluster with over a thousand users.

I find it reasonably priced.

It is a cluster solution.

Microsoft Exchange Online is an affordable solution.

Microsoft solutions are expensive.

We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution. The cost depends upon the plans we choose and the types of applications we want to use. We have a three-year deal with Microsoft to get a good price for the product. They are very willing to revise the price, accompany us for the setup, and give us a framework. They are very impressive to work with. There are no additional costs associated with the product.

The pricing is fine. I've discussed this with customers, and they have found the price point to be fair. When you compare it to others, like Google, it is competitive. If it could be lower, of course, it would be ideal. The solution costs $12 to $16 per user per month.

The pricing is based on a yearly contract and a floating license option is offered.

The cost of our annual license for the solution is moderate. I would give the cost a five out of ten.

The license for the solution is cheap, but it could be more affordable in the long term.

We have a yearly license for Exchange Online.

The licensing cost varies. For example, we have E1 and E3 licenses. Currently, it's approximately E3 $20 per user.

I would say the solution is reasonable and affordable. Compared to the competitors, I would say it gives you a lot more functionality and is easy to integrate with other applications and tools. I give the solution ten out of ten for pricing.

We have an Office 360 subscription. I'm not sure. It's somewhere between $100 and $200, but I couldn't tell you. I didn't install it on my computer. The app is a resident on my computer, but it's a Microsoft Office subscription with automatic updates, and it's not like a version of the application that I purchased and installed on a disc on my machine. I don't own the application because I pay an annual subscription to use it. Previously you had to buy it at a computer store and own it until you purchased the next version. That is not the case. I pay approximately $120 or $150 per year, and as long as I pay that amount, they will do regular updates so that I always have the most recent and greatest version of the application.

The pricing for this solution is good. We renew our contract every three years. I would rate the pricing for this solution a three out of five.

The price of Microsoft Exchange Online security could improve. The overall price of the solution is reasonable.

The cost of Microsoft Exchange Online is approximately $4 to $36 per user. They do not give a discount which is not good. The solution is expensive if you have 800 to 1,000 users. They should give discounts when you have a lot of users.

The pricing is always something that could be better. We always like to work towards protecting our budget. I know what the cloud cost per user is. I don't have what the on-premises costs are.

I believe that the solution is not cheap but that it's a good investment. It's affordable but they've made licensing into a complex issue and it's difficult to try and follow all the changes.

The pricing could be cheaper.

There's a licensing cost, but it's included in our Azure pricing, so I'm not really concerned about it.

The pricing is really high. It's higher compared to other services. The license is yearly.

You do need to pay a licensing fee in order to access the solution. There are also enterprise agreements where companies would have to agree to a certain level of volume. It could be less expensive. If it was, more companies would use it.

Pricing is good. However, it's also not exactly cheap. It's my understanding that we have a contract that runs for two or three years with an enterprise agreement backing all this up. We do not buy on a yearly basis. That would be unusual for our company to buy for such short term.

I think that the price is a little high, especially considering that Google have a similar, free email solution.

I am using Office 365 and Microsoft Exchange Online comes as the package. It cost approximately $13 per month.

We have an annual subscription. The price could be cheaper.

This solution requires a license.

The licensing price could be lower. The subscription fee is monthly.

The price of the solution could be less expensive.

We have an enterprise agreement for licensing.

We have a license per user scenario.

The pricing is a bit more expensive than other solutions.

Regarding the pricing and licensing of the solution, it's great. I think it's just awesome. There's no argument about how much value you get on the per user, for user expenditure. It's really great, I don't have any issues with it. I think it's excellent.

The price is a bit high. It is especially expensive in the Indian market.

I have no comment about the pricing of the product.

I think it is a very manageable and reasonable solution. There are different licensing agreements that you can choose, according to your company's needs. In general, I think this is a pretty reasonable solution.

Initially, we had issues with the licensing agreement, but we worked it out with Microsoft.