What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Sense?

Considering the deal that we have acquired, Qlik Sense is pretty good in terms of price.

The product is reasonably priced. You need to pay 5,000 Norwegian kroner per user. Microsoft Power BI is slightly more expensive than Qlik Sense.

Qlik Sense is pricier than other BI tools, with various licensing models, including potentially expensive token-based licenses. Organizations should carefully assess their budget and licensing requirements before choosing Qlik Sense.

It is a little expensive for the Italian market. In particular, it's not easy. Right now, other products have more aggressive pricing, making it tough to sell Qlik Sense. We sell differently, but it's not easy. A cheaper price would be better for us. Normally, Qlik Sense has two types and costs. The medium cost is around 700 euros per year. One license costs 840 euros per year, and the other is 400 euros per year. Medium is around 700 or 600 euros.

The product is expensive compared to Power BI. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten.

The entire setup process is very simple. The licensing fee seems high at first. That said, the productivity and speed of delivery make up for it. There have been no billing surprises, as there is no need for other acquisitions, such as databases.

We'd like it if they could provide a discount.

I'm not able to reveal the licensing cost for Qlik Sense, but because it was a huge deal, the cost was less than the usual cost. The license wasn't that costly. It was the infrastructure that was very costly.

I'd advise users to negotiate directly with the sales team for the best deal.

The pricing of the product is very competitive. The licensing and the setup process is super smooth and easy.

I'd advise users to go to the cloud. If you can, go directly to the SaaS version. From a cost perspective, it was cheaper than other solutions - and better. Now it might seem more expensive, however, with all the features available, and being able to create a full data pipeline, it makes more sense using Qlik Sense.

We pay for our license on a one-year basis, and I would rate Qlik's pricing four out of five.

Economies of scale come into play very quickly, especially with no enterprise/infrastructure-specific licensing for Qlik Sense. With on-premise solutions, there can be a requirement for some heavy hardware, however, moving into the cloud means this can be reduced.

It is expensive, but a worthwhile step.

For on-premise enterprise users, a number of additional features come at a premium cost.

Higher cost comparing to other solutions

It is a flexible tool and has the ability to scale. Pricing is reasonable. Our setup was very easy as we utilized what was already built-in Qlik View.

I was not part of the evaluation team.

My understanding is that there is just a license fee. I don't believe there are ancillary costs on top of that. It may not be an affordable option for smaller organizations, however, It's more suited to larger companies due to the costs involved.

A 3rd party company to create the first apps could be useful, if affordable.

My advice is to always evaluate the respective use cases to determine whether it is the best tool to go with.

You should make a very deep and detailed analysis of what you really need, analyze integration possibilities onto your current system, review internal knowledge, and build a picture of your future BI system in the next five years.

In terms of pricing and licensing, I suggest that you do your research.

QlikSense offers a hybrid environment architecture, which is very cost effective based on where the enterprise data resides. The flexible licensing model is based on usage and architecture.

Licensing can start to get expensive, but compared to other tools in this space it is about average.

I suggest talking to the Account managers, as they are very resourceful and responsive.

Licensing is quite good, easy, but slightly expensive. We'll keep increasing the number of users and then we can probably get better discounts.

* Setup time was very quick and easy * The cost was similar to other vendors.