BigPanda could improve by syncing its threshold settings with Dynatrace to align with users' familiarity. This would reduce manual effort in analyzing alerts. Automation is needed to distinguish real incidents from false alarms. Additionally, better synchronization with configuration management for server status updates is necessary. Currently, the system is evolving, requiring time to stabilize, given the newness of the tools and technologies being adopted.
We'd like to see additional dashboard features included as part of the solution. What we currently have doesn't show if there is any utilization and how much memory is there.
Automation Solution Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-09-20T09:00:37Z
Sep 20, 2022
BigPanda can improve the correlations. We didn't see any big value. It is still good at the same event deduplication, event processing, and ticket creation, but I was more looking at event analysis and event correlation. In that area, it is still no big difference between the other solutions on the market. All of them, are in the same immature stage.
Honestly, all areas can use major improvement. We wanted a 'one-stop-shop' for event monitoring, visualization, and infrastructure DevOps with AI. BigPanda attempts a little of everything and fails at most. The AI, in particular, was worthless, the visualization primitive and not configurable.
The observability can be enriched with regards to infrastructure and the application-integrated environment. The dashboard and reports could be improved. A more integrated multi-cloud environment with regards to Azure, Amazon, Google, and the on-prem solution would be a big advantage.
Global Process Owner at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2019-09-12T09:06:00Z
Sep 12, 2019
The usability needs to improve because it is a pure code environment. It would be good if they could have a pre-designed code like the new tools that are in the market now. UiPath, for example, offers drag and drop. If this feature can be added, I think it will be a breakthrough. It will completely change the solution and attract even seasonal coders and make it more valuable.
Our infrastructure is quite large - tens of thousands of servers, often with 30-plus checks running on each host with one minute intervals. This generates a lot of data often in bursts (when we have a large scale failure). This has caused some delay in the ingestion pipeline.
IT infrastructure encompasses all of the components necessary for the operation as well as the management of enterprise information technology (IT) services and environments.
BigPanda could improve by syncing its threshold settings with Dynatrace to align with users' familiarity. This would reduce manual effort in analyzing alerts. Automation is needed to distinguish real incidents from false alarms. Additionally, better synchronization with configuration management for server status updates is necessary. Currently, the system is evolving, requiring time to stabilize, given the newness of the tools and technologies being adopted.
We had to use a partner for the deployment.
We'd like to see additional dashboard features included as part of the solution. What we currently have doesn't show if there is any utilization and how much memory is there.
BigPanda can improve the correlations. We didn't see any big value. It is still good at the same event deduplication, event processing, and ticket creation, but I was more looking at event analysis and event correlation. In that area, it is still no big difference between the other solutions on the market. All of them, are in the same immature stage.
The UI for this solution could be improved. It is very hard to find what you are looking for.
Honestly, all areas can use major improvement. We wanted a 'one-stop-shop' for event monitoring, visualization, and infrastructure DevOps with AI. BigPanda attempts a little of everything and fails at most. The AI, in particular, was worthless, the visualization primitive and not configurable.
The observability can be enriched with regards to infrastructure and the application-integrated environment. The dashboard and reports could be improved. A more integrated multi-cloud environment with regards to Azure, Amazon, Google, and the on-prem solution would be a big advantage.
The solution could improve by having better integration.
The cost of this product is too high compared to New Relic. It would be helpful if we could receive alerts through IP.
The usability needs to improve because it is a pure code environment. It would be good if they could have a pre-designed code like the new tools that are in the market now. UiPath, for example, offers drag and drop. If this feature can be added, I think it will be a breakthrough. It will completely change the solution and attract even seasonal coders and make it more valuable.
Our infrastructure is quite large - tens of thousands of servers, often with 30-plus checks running on each host with one minute intervals. This generates a lot of data often in bursts (when we have a large scale failure). This has caused some delay in the ingestion pipeline.