AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Reviews

Name: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Brand: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Rating: 3.9 (16 reviews)

3.9 out of 5

16 reviews
87% willing to recommend

476 followers

What is AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery?

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Get the AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, Veeam Data Platform, Commvault Cloud and more!

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is the #15 ranked solution in top Disaster Recovery Software, #19 ranked solution in top Cloud Backup solutions, and #27 ranked solution in best Backup and Recovery Software. PeerSpot users give AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is most commonly compared to Veeam Data Platform: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Veeam Data Platform. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 62% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 12% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

February 2025

Get the report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Duy AnhMai

Product Owner at Heineken

We are using AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery for backup purposes in our company AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is convenient because it is cloud-based technology. The strong points are the stability and scalability of the solution, as well as the convenience of it being cloud-based. The cost of…

Read full review

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status. I have to calculate whether my data is replicated to the Adarabad region or not. These features, if available in AWS, would be beneficial.

Read full review

Miller Cortés

Senior Sales Engineer at Sencinet

The primary use case for AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is to ensure data replication and protection across diverse environments without the need for hypervisor integration. The product's most valuable features include its ease of deployment, cost-effectiveness due to AWS's pay-as-you-go pricing…

Read full review

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery mindshare

Product category:

As of February 2025, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category stands at 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

PeerAnalyst reports

Type	Title	Date
Category	Disaster Recovery (DR) Software	Feb 1, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Feb 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Veeam Data Platform	Feb 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Zerto	Feb 1, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Commvault Cloud	Feb 1, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Veeam Data Platform	4.3	24.0%	94%	422 interviews Add to research
Commvault Cloud	4.3	11.9%	95%	108 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers valuable features like easy data replication between clouds, ensuring freedom from vendor lock-in. Its speedy setup, reliability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness with pay-as-you-go pricing are appreciated. Instant block replication is vital for critical workloads. Users benefit from seamless integration with AWS services, reducing infrastructure management time. The managed service offers high availability, security, and flexibility, excelling in backing up and restoring data efficiently. Stability and ease of use enhance its appeal.

"What I like about ECR AWS is that it is a fully managed service, so I don't need to manage the underlying infrastructure or worry about scalability in AWS concerning building, maintenance, security, and high availability."
"It offers seamless integration with services like ACL, EKS, and Fargate for deploying containerized applications."
"Customer service is quite helpful."

Room for Improvement

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery needs improvements in automation and ease of use, especially for replicating and utilizing data. Users report outdated data due to complex manual processes and insufficient notifications when servers lag. Many experience issues with logging, requiring reliance on vendor support. The UI could be enhanced, as well as support for handling large archives. Cost, pricing structure, and features like failback and orchestration capabilities are also concerns for users seeking better efficiency and intuitive use.

"In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as push or pull."
"An improved AWS pricing model is needed."
"Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status."

ROI

Organizations found AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery to be valuable with significant ROI by saving costs on hardware and reducing downtime and data loss. They benefited from seamless integration and versatility across various server types and platforms. Although effective, the cost of retaining snapshot data remains a consideration for smaller businesses due to AWS EDS storage expenses. Despite this, the service supports reputation management by mitigating disaster impacts, enhancing reliability, and offering remedies for emerging issues.

Pricing

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery's pricing is viewed as fair but can accumulate due to CloudEndure licenses, AWS environment, and storage costs. Users appreciate tiered pricing, allowing less frequent replication. Long-term deals offer discounts but may limit flexibility. Costs depend on usage frequency and can be perceived as expensive compared to alternatives. Licensing is straightforward but managed by third parties for some. Overall value is considered reasonable, though it rates variably between 6 and 8 out of ten.

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."
"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

Popular Use Cases

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is primarily utilized for data protection and backup, ensuring effective disaster recovery across environments. Organizations implement it to facilitate recovery procedures, handle outages, and support compliance with regulations. It is applied in cases like infrastructure issues, database protection, and security breaches. Migration to the cloud, collaboration with multiple clients, and testing recovery reliability are common practices observed among users deploying AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery.

Service and Support

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery receives positive feedback for its customer service and support. Relationships with management, including the CTO and architects, are deemed strong, enhancing customer service. Technical support is generally responsive and effective, with quick response times. Phone support is good but lacks a formal ticketing system. Users with AWS enterprise-level support appreciate its benefits within the defined SLA timeline. Some engage third parties for additional assistance and have not needed to contact support frequently.

Deployment

Users found AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery's initial setup generally easy and straightforward. Some experienced simplicity during the implementation while others appreciated ease after setup. Although one noted complex implementation, it's mostly stress-free unless specific configurations are needed. Assistance from third parties sometimes facilitated the process. Some focused efforts on building the AWS environment, then added servers gradually. Confidence in managing it post-setup is common, typically requiring minimal staffing.

Scalability

Users find AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery scalable, with seamless, automatic operations and reliable capacity management. It accommodates diverse environments, from small setups to large enterprises. Licensing on a per-machine basis supports specific needs, with many rating scalability highly. Visual tools help monitor server status effectively. Although some rate scalability slightly lower, most agree it's robust, providing a smooth upgrade experience and powerful reporting features. There's confidence in its scalability without significant adjustments needed.

Stability

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is described as stable by most users. They report no major issues after implementation, with some noting occasional server lag or the need to reset a particular server. Network bandwidth affects performance; with good bandwidth, performance is optimal. Stability is often rated between eight and nine out of ten. Users appreciate the reliability, with no crashes or freezes observed. Cost concerns arise due to data replication expenses.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.