Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Security Verify Access Logo

IBM Security Verify Access Reviews

Vendor: IBM
3.9 out of 5
Start review

What is IBM Security Verify Access?

IBM Security Verify Access is a complete authorization and network security policy management solution. It provides end-to-end protection of resources over geographically dispersed intranets and extranets.Provides a wide range of built-in authenticators and supports external authenticators.Provides permit and deny decisions for protected resources requests in the secure domain through the authorization API.Manages secure access to private internal network-based resources by using the public Internet's broad connectivity and ease of use with a corporate firewall system.

Get the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about IBM Security Verify Access, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud and more!
IBM Security Verify Access is the #13 ranked solution in top Access Management solutions, #14 ranked solution in top Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions, #19 ranked solution in top Identity and Access Management as a Service providers, and #25 ranked solution in top Identity Management (IM) solutions. PeerSpot users give IBM Security Verify Access an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. IBM Security Verify Access is most commonly compared to Microsoft Entra ID: IBM Security Verify Access vs Microsoft Entra ID. IBM Security Verify Access is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 77% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 23% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
March 2025
Get the category report
Helped 842,690 peers since 2012

Featured IBM Security Verify Access reviews

Read more reviews

IBM Security Verify Access mindshare

Product category:
Identity and Access Management as a S...
As of April 2025, the mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category stands at 1.7%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Users note that IBM Security Verify Access excels in multifactor authentication, access control, and single sign-on features. They find it highly customizable and appreciate the seamless integration with various systems. Its flexibility and adaptability are frequently highlighted, along with strong support for complex environments. Advanced security protocols and ease of deployment are also praised. Users also compliment its robust policy management capabilities and real-time monitoring.
  • "The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."
  • "From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth. For legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users. From the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."
  • "The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

Room for Improvement

IBM Security Verify Access requires improvements in usability to streamline operations for administrators, documentation for better clarity, and support processes to enhance customer experience. Configuration complexity and integration challenges with third-party applications limit its functionality. Performance issues and the need for more comprehensive reporting tools are also noted. Automated deployment and updates need enhancement for efficiency.
  • "The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial."
  • "They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."
  • "What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding.We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium.As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

ROI

Users found IBM Security Verify Access enhanced security measures, reduced workload for IT staff, and provided a faster return on investment compared to other alternatives. Implementation led to notable savings by automating authentication processes and reducing potential breaches. Companies experienced significant improvements in efficiency and productivity, which translated into cost savings and better resource allocation.

Pricing

IBM Security Verify Access offers flexible pricing based on usage and deployment options. Many users appreciate its cost-effectiveness for large enterprises, along with volume-based discounts. Its pricing model accommodates both cloud-based and on-premises implementations, providing scalability and tailored solutions.
  • "The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."
  • "It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."
  • "The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

Popular Use Cases

IBM Security Verify Access is primarily employed for secure access management and identity federation. Users utilize it to integrate with existing systems for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and to enhance security protocols. It assists in managing user identities and access privileges efficiently and is noted for its scalability in large enterprises.

Service and Support

IBM Security Verify Access receives positive feedback for its responsive and knowledgeable customer service. Users appreciate quick resolution times and professional support staff. Many highlight the efficiency of the assistance provided and mention that the support team is well-informed about the product's features and troubleshooting methods. Users feel confident using IBM Security Verify Access due to the reliable support system in place.

Deployment

Users find IBM Security Verify Access's initial setup manageable with proper documentation. They appreciate its clear instructions and support but note that it could be complex for those with limited technical expertise. The setup process is straightforward for experienced professionals, and they value the well-structured installation guides. Some mention it requires careful planning to align with specific requirements. Users also highlight the importance of following the provided guidelines to avoid potential obstacles.

Scalability

Users find IBM Security Verify Access highly scalable, suitable for large enterprises, and easy to integrate with existing systems. Its performance remains consistent even with increased load, while maintaining robust security features. Installation may require technical expertise but provides excellent support and documentation. Interface is intuitive, allowing for quick deployment. It efficiently handles multiple users and applications, making it a reliable choice for growing demands and complex environments.

Stability

IBM Security Verify Access provides robust stability. Users frequently express satisfaction with its performance, highlighting its reliability in diverse environments. It handles high loads efficiently and integrates well with existing systems. Technical support is responsive, which enhances user confidence. Periodic updates and patches maintain its dependability. Users appreciate its consistent uptime and minimal disruptions, making it a trusted choice for secure access management.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Insurance Company
17%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Retailer
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
University
3%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%

Compare IBM Security Verify Access with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about IBM Security Verify Access

IBM Security Verify Access was previously known as IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM.

IBM Security Verify Access customers

POST Luxembourg

Related questions

  • 41
Looking for an Identity and Access Management product for an energy and utility organization
  • 209
Is SSO safe?
  • 90
Which is the best Privileged Account Management solution?
  • 159
What are your best practices for Identity and Access Management (IAM) in the Cloud?
  • 42
Why is identity and access management (IAM) so important in preventing data breaches?
  • 5
What access management tools would you recommend to help with GDPR compliance?
  • 18
How to convince a client that Identity and Access Management (IdAM) is essential for risk elimination?
  • 106
How is Zero Trust different from the Least Privileged model?
  • 66
What are the differences between LDAP and Active Directory?
  • 98
Which IDaaS solution do you prefer and why?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
Single Sign-On (SSO)
Identity Management (IM)
Access Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access
Okta Workforce Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Okta Workforce Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access
Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
Ping Identity Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access
IBM Cloud Identity Service vs IBM Security Verify Access Logo
IBM Cloud Identity Service vs IBM Security Verify Access
See all alternatives
 

IBM Security Verify Access reviews

Sort by:
AsifIqbal - PeerSpot user
Chief Information Security Officer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of IBM Security Verify Access
Aug 15, 2022
Has good scalability and is stable with no glitches; has a multi-factor authentication feature

Pros

"The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

Cons

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

What is our primary use case?

Currently, we're using IBM Security Access Manager for multi-factor authentication.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of IBM Security Access Manager, at least for my company, is multi-factor authentication. That's the only feature my company is using. The solution works well and has no glitches. IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it.

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Read full review (670 words)
PeerSpot user
Assitant Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of IBM Security Verify Access
Mar 28, 2022
It has good UI and reliability, but it is challenging to customize the out-of-the-box functionality

Pros

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

Cons

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product. It is not easy to tweak the functionality. It is challenging to change the out-of-the-box functionality."

What is our primary use case?

It is mostly used for access management. It handles all aspects of access, such as single sign-on, access control, etc.

We are using its latest version. It is a VM-based product. So, it is more of a cloud product.

How has it helped my organization?

It can do a lot of different functions. Different types of teams can use this product for a variety of use cases, such as RSA, OTP, and single sign-on functionalities. It is completely oriented around access. 

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Read full review (430 words)
Buyer's Guide
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
Download free report
Find out what your peers are saying about Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS). Updated March 2025
842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Jared Ochieng - PeerSpot user
Information Technology Security Specialist at infoark
Verified user of IBM Security Verify Access
Mar 15, 2024
Offers multiple authentication methods like tokens and one-time passwords

Pros

"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options. "

Cons

"The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial. "

What is most valuable?

The authentication process with IBM Security Verify Access is good and is considered one of the best identity and access management solutions. It helps with multi-factor authentication. 

It offers multiple authentication methods like tokens and one-time passwords, enhancing security. It also includes features like password vaults and single sign-on, streamlining the access process for remote and local users across different solutions.

The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options.

The policy control feature allows you to set authentication measures and policies for your organization's identity governance. This feature helps create standardized policies and organize them into groups based on departments or specific needs. It simplifies access management for both administrators and users. 

IBM Security Verify Access can be integrated with almost any solution using APIs. The time required for integration depends on whether the solution is out of the box or custom. Out-of-the-box solutions can be integrated quickly, typically within a few days or hours, while custom solutions may require additional steps and take longer to integrate.

What needs improvement?

The user interface for users and administrators could be improved to make it easier. Automating some functions could also be beneficial.

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Read full review (450 words)
Gaurav Gaurav - PeerSpot user
Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of IBM Security Verify Access
Aug 21, 2022
Supports on-prem and cloud environments, has good integration capabilities, and is easy to adopt

Pros

"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth. For legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users. From the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."

Cons

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area. OIDC is a third-party integration that we do with the cloud platforms, and OAuth is an authorization mechanism for allowing a user having an account with Google or any other provider to access an application. Organizations these days are looking for just-in-time provisioning use cases, but IBM Security Access Manager is not very mature for such use cases. There are only a few applications that can be integrated, and this is where this product is lagging. However, in terms of configuration and single sign-on mechanisms, it is a great product."

What is our primary use case?

It is used for access management. I have its latest version. I don't know the exact version number, but 10.0.0 was the latest version, which is now named IBM Security Verify Access.

How has it helped my organization?

It provides good support for legacy applications. Legacy applications are the ones that don't support the latest mechanisms or protocols for access management. An example would be an in-house application built in the banking environment or insurance environment with a login page where inside the application, there are multiple modules to create a contract or submit some documents. Such legacy or in-house applications do not support protocols like SAML or OIDC. IBM Security Access Manager provides a very good integration mechanism in such cases. It has an IV user-header-based single sign-on mechanism for bypassing the login page and providing single sign-on access to users. It is very easy to configure. We just need a few details from the application side, which are provided by the application owner, and then we can configure the solution and go live. It is a very quick mechanism. We can integrate more than a hundred applications within three months.

It also supports SAML, which is a great protocol but requires coding. You need to know Java scripting to be able to code the token configuration for SAML Single Sign-on. IBM Security Access Manager supports the coding mechanism for SAML Single Sign-on to SaaS-based solutions or on-prem solutions.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (702 words)
Pakorn Leesakul - PeerSpot user
CEO, Founder at Finema
Verified user of IBM Security Verify Access
May 19, 2021
Effortless user sign in, highly scalable, and reliable

Pros

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth. "

Cons

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

What is our primary use case?

I am a provider of mobile authentication and my customers want to upgrade the Single Sign-On platform solution. We then provide them our mobile authentication to plugin with the new version of IBM's Single Sign-On.

What is most valuable?

I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth. 

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Implementer
Read full review (395 words)
PeerSpot user
Manager in Digital Identity at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of IBM Security Verify Access
Nov 17, 2019
Stable with a straightforward setup and good mobile features

Pros

"The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security."

Cons

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

What is most valuable?

The mobile features of the solution are very good. Users can enroll via QR code. The product also has a very small firewall application. 

The solution has powerful authentification and authorization. It offers a good way to increase security.

What needs improvement?

I'm not as familiar with the cloud deployment model, but if it's not as reliable as the on-premises version, they need to ensure it's just as secure.

Configuration could be simplified for the end-user.

*Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Read full review (193 words)
NS
Senior Network Engineer at IIS
Verified user of IBM Security Verify Access
Jan 28, 2020
Secure access with authentication and good technical support, but needs a more simplified user interface

Pros

"It's a good solution for identification and access management. "

Cons

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use cases of this solution are for my clients who are mainly from the banks and the University. I work on projects with our local University with a federation and we do the authentication of the students.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is the authorization.

*Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Read full review (262 words)