Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Loadbalancer.org?

Featured Loadbalancer.org reviews

Loadbalancer.org mindshare

As of March 2025, the mindshare of Loadbalancer.org in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 3.4%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerAnalyst reports based on Loadbalancer.org reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)Mar 7, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 7, 2025Download
ComparisonLoadbalancer.org vs NetScalerMar 7, 2025Download
ComparisonLoadbalancer.org vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Mar 7, 2025Download
ComparisonLoadbalancer.org vs HAProxyMar 7, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)4.115.7%83%120 interviewsAdd to research
NetScaler4.215.1%91%107 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Government
9%
University
7%
Media Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Retailer
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Hospitality Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Construction Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Non Profit
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%

Compare Loadbalancer.org with alternative products

Learn more about Loadbalancer.org

Loadbalancer.org customers

Related questions

 

Loadbalancer.org reviews

Sort by:
Roger Seelaender - PeerSpot user
UCaaS Engineering Manager at EarthLink
Verified user of Loadbalancer.org
Oct 21, 2022
Great WAF - low-maintenance solution that performs as advertised

Pros

"The features I find valuable in this solution are the ease of managing the logs on the WAFs, the ease to identify break-in attempts into the network, the front-end firewall, and a more specific firewall."

Cons

"You can run into an issue when one engineer passes the case over to another engineer after their shift and they don't know what the first engineer worked on up to that point."
RB
Consultant at Altran
Verified user of Loadbalancer.org
Dec 7, 2022

Pros

"I found scalability in Loadbalancer.org valuable."

Cons

"An area for improvement in Loadbalancer.org is that sometimes it works fine, but sometimes, it has issues. The setup for Loadbalancer.org is also complex, so that's another area for improvement."
Find out what your peers are saying about Loadbalancer.org. Updated February 2025
841,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AM
System Engeneer at CROC
Verified user of Loadbalancer.org
Jan 28, 2022
Open-source, suited for small business with limited resources, and is easy to deploy

Pros

"Loadbalancer.org is less complex than Citrix."

Cons

"Loadbalancer.org's complexity could be reduced."
Nigus Machin Amare - PeerSpot user
Network & Security Engineer at Malam Engineering PLC
Verified user of Loadbalancer.org
Nov 3, 2024
Load management and balancing efficiency that's flexible

Pros

"The most valuable features of Loadbalancer.org are related to its load balancing capabilities."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in Loadbalancer.org in certain areas."
CD
Systems Programmer at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
Verified user of Loadbalancer.org
Mar 14, 2018
Product version discussed: VS MAX 8.3.1
Their pricing scheme is easy and inexpensive

Pros

"We now get notifications when pool members go down, and we eliminate our downtime by not sending traffic to downed pool members.​"

Cons

"​I would like a notification when a new version of the software is available. They told me to sign up for their newsletter, but I have not received any notification for a newer software version.​"
Kunle Oyetola - PeerSpot user
Head Of Business at Zeta-Web Nigeria Limited
Verified user of Loadbalancer.org
Apr 5, 2022
Good technical support, performs well, but stability and scalability could be improved

Pros

"The performance is good."

Cons

"I'd like to see scalability improved; it can be costly."
PR
Ifra Texture Specialist at kyndryl
Verified user of Loadbalancer.org
Sep 19, 2022
Product version discussed: 13.X.
Scalable load balancing solution used to provide stability for users and reduces the impact of downtime

Pros

"The connection that this solution helps our servers maintain has been most useful."

Cons

"The configuration is somewhat complicated. Someone who does not know the solution may find this challenging. "
PL
IT Manager at a recruiting/HR firm with 51-200 employees
Verified user of Loadbalancer.org
Jul 31, 2018
SSL Layer 7 load balancing helps us run our line-of-business software

Pros

"The SSL Layer 7 load balancing is valuable."

Cons

"Originally we had some stability issues with it, so they replaced it with a new box and it's fine."