Users appreciate Azure Active Directory Identity Protection for its strong compliance and authentication capabilities. They also find the solution's information security and sensitive labeling to be valuable, along with its effective sign-in and audit logs. The reverse proxy feature adds an extra layer of security that is not found in competing solutions like SailPoint and Dell.
- "The features we find most effective for identity security include access reviews, two-factor authentication, and modification."
- "The valuable features include multifactor authentication, accessory capabilities, and conditional access for specific applications."
- "The multifactor authentication feature is effective, providing an additional layer of security."
Azure Active Directory Identity Protection has room for improvement in several areas. For example, it should enhance its compatibility with Mac devices, as it currently works seamlessly with Windows but lacks optimization for Mac.
Additionally, stability and scalability need to be improved.
There is a need for better identity labeling and sensitivity, comparable to Dell. The password management system should incorporate a mechanism that allows or blocks generic passwords based on keywords.
The auditor tool should include SIEM events in addition to sign-in and audit logs, as currently, users have to rely on third-party solutions for their log needs. The solution's models should be centralized instead of being spread across different names and platforms, as the integration process with IAM can be time-consuming.
- "Microsoft has room for improvement in simplifying their integration with third-party solutions and making the licensing model more understandable."
- "The recent CrowdStrike issue affected most systems."
- "There is a lot of confusion around the user interface."
