OpenText Network Node Manager i Reviews

Name: OpenText Network Node Manager i
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 3.9 (23 reviews)

3.9 out of 5

23 reviews
95% willing to recommend

891 followers

What is OpenText Network Node Manager i?

OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi) delivers powerful capabilities enabling NOCs to manage modern networks. NNMi Smart Plug-ins expand NNMi into specialized environments, helping your team reduce time to resolve issues. NNMi is a core component of Network Operations Management.

Get the OpenText Network Node Manager i Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Network Node Manager i, Cisco DNA Center, Fortinet FortiManager and more!

OpenText Network Node Manager i is the #12 ranked solution in top Network Management Applications. PeerSpot users give OpenText Network Node Manager i an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Based on the analysis of the 23 most recent OpenText Network Node Manager i reviews, the overall sentiment is , with a sentiment score of 5.9. (Among the lowest in the category). OpenText Network Node Manager i is most commonly compared to Cisco DNA Center: OpenText Network Node Manager i vs Cisco DNA Center. OpenText Network Node Manager i is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 56% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 18% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Network Node Manager i

December 2024

Get the report

Helped 825,399 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Mirit Goldring-Boymshtain

Delivery Manager at We R Tech

The platform has a lot of interesting capabilities. Implementation is simplified, in contrast to some products like SolarWinds, where external assistance is often required for meet uploads. It is more inexpensive than other products in the market. In a specific customer implementation, the complex topology of the customer's network revealed a separate and closed segment at one of their sites. We could not understand the status of the broken network and devices. With the help of NNMi, we got a view of the issues. The product helps us reduce downtime and improve incident response time by offering remediation options. The tools run automatically, checking the network activities for different areas and time zones. It provides efficient documentation, interface, and integration features. I rate the product a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Muhammad-Bilal

Integration Consultant at Multilynx

The network phase in the product could be improved. Other tools such as SolarWinds have real-time bandwidth, and they can calculate bandwidth in MBs, which means something. But Micro Focus Network Node Manager always watches bandwidth. With Micro Focus, bandwidth utilization networks always show in bytes. It makes it difficult for the end-user to calculate. Micro Focus needs to offer customized dashboards. The reporting is very complex. It's not simple. As a network person, I want to see the top end network devices, who is using maximum bandwidth or who is using maximum MB. It only requires a very simple graphic, a simple dashboard that I have customized myself. I would prefer to deploy SolarWinds or PRTG. Unfortunately, our company only deploys Micro Focus. Additional features that could be included would be customizing some simple features like dashboard support. They also need to upgrade their level of support and focus on their customers. That's what's important.

Read full review

Prem Raj

Senior Information Technology Security Officer at alpha

In terms of improvement, I would say that the resources utilized could be a bit higher, and that is one of the challenges that isn't optimized to my expectations. For additional features that could be included, I have nothing to suggest for now. Things are going well. It's really a classic model. If it's moved over to cloud then it could definitely become a living giant in the market.

Read full review

OpenText Network Node Manager i mindshare

As of January 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Network Node Manager i in the Network Management Applications category stands at 2.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Management Applications

PeerAnalyst reports

Type	Title	Date
Category	Network Management Applications	Jan 2, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jan 2, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Network Node Manager i vs Cisco DNA Center	Jan 2, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Network Node Manager i vs Aruba Airwave	Jan 2, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Network Node Manager i vs Fortinet FortiManager	Jan 2, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Cisco DNA Center	4.0	29.7%	89%	40 interviews Add to research
Fortinet FortiManager	4.0	5.5%	94%	63 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

OpenText Network Node Manager i offers multi-vendor support, effective root cause analysis, and stable real-time monitoring, providing valuable insights into network performance. Users appreciate its ability to create topology maps, integrate with tools like ServiceNow, and handle diverse devices efficiently. It delivers comprehensive reports, supports various poll customization, and enables easy network management for enterprises. Its capabilities enhance monitoring of physical and virtual devices and adapt to different vendor environments.

"The platform has good stability."
"The best feature is the solution's entire credibility with all vendors."
"It is stable for fault and availability."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Network Node Manager i requires improvements in routing protocol management and documentation. Users seek enhanced real-time alerts and better performance features. Reports and dashboards are complex, and technical support needs enhancement. Scalability and stability present challenges. There's a demand for better integration with NAC servers and third-party APIs. Topology maps can be difficult to interpret. Users desire more customization options, including dashboards, and expect capabilities to evolve with technological advancements.

"They should add AI options in the product's next release."
"The solution should integrate with NAC servers."
"Micro Focus Network Node Manager is not powered to drill down for traffic visibility."

Pricing

Enterprise buyers find OpenText Network Node Manager i to have substantial pricing due to its enterprise-level nature and comprehensive support services. It offers perpetual lifetime licenses with annual subscriptions, reflecting its advanced configuration and maintenance requirements. Though considered expensive, opinions vary with some finding it mid-range among competitors. The cost of additional modules, such as performance and reporting tools, might raise budget concerns within organizations familiar with its pricing structure.

"It is more inexpensive than other products in the market."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"It's an expensive solution."

Popular Use Cases

Network Node Manager i is used for monitoring network infrastructure, devices, switches, routers, firewalls, and more. Organizations utilize it for fault, availability, and performance monitoring and reporting. It supports integrations for SNP and is employed by IT managers and admins. Companies manage extensive networks with thousands of devices, including cameras and IoT, using error detection and topology mapping. It benefits enterprises with network teams and system integrators involved in deployment and configuration.

Service and Support

OpenText Network Node Manager i customer service and support receive mixed feedback. Some users praise dedicated support with known environments, emphasizing Premier service's efficiency. Others experience delays, repetitive questions, and undertrained staff, particularly with standard support. Expect long wait times and challenges moving cases to higher-level experts. Some users prefer support from contractors, noting Micro Focus struggles with time zones and slow response times. Premium support and dedicated personnel improve user satisfaction significantly.

Deployment

Experiences with OpenText Network Node Manager i's initial setup vary, with some finding it straightforward while others describe it as complex and requiring expertise. Documentation appears lacking, surprising some users, and setup often needs consultants or knowledgeable staff. For Linux, it's notably challenging. Transitioning to virtual servers introduced issues. Configuration demands continuous focus, especially for smart plugins, requiring support cases. Deployment can take hours to weeks, particularly in large environments, emphasizing the need for an experienced network team.

Scalability

Many users report OpenText Network Node Manager i handles large enterprises well, supporting extensive network infrastructures. It's praised for scaling from hundreds to thousands of nodes and interfaces efficiently. However, some experience limitations with connections and database performance, requiring alternative solutions. Hardware requirements for scaling are minimal, easing the scalability process. Pre-planning can aid future scalability adaptations, although specific teams and expertise are sometimes necessary. Despite some drawbacks, it remains a reliable choice for network scalability.

Stability

OpenText Network Node Manager i exhibits a high level of stability according to multiple users. It is consistently operational with minimal downtime and few instances of unexpected breakdowns. Users note it as reliable, especially after configuration and replacement of initial issues. Some experience stability issues using a VM Windows-based environment, but plan upgrades to a Linux-based system to improve it. The tool is generally rated highly for stability, often earning scores near eight out of ten.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our OpenText Network Node Manager i Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.