QlikView Reviews

Many find measuring ROI from QlikView challenging, emphasizing time and efficiency savings over concrete financial returns. ROI perception varies, from neutral to good, with some comparing it favorably to other BI tools. Licensing costs and project size impact ROI estimation. Quick deployment and improvement in data handling often yield immediate advantages, while high licensing costs can deter extensive use. Feedback highlights improved decision-making and efficiency but an elusive direct quantification of ROI.

QlikView pricing and licensing can be costly, particularly for small companies, but is competitive in the market for medium and large enterprises. Costs depend on the number of users and license types, with server licenses starting at approximately $9,000 and user licenses ranging from $350 to $1,500. An annual maintenance fee of about 20% is typical. Many users report high implementation costs but note significant ROI and flexibility in license negotiation, especially when considering the dual use with Qlik Sense.

• "The platform's pricing is considered quite expensive, particularly given the dollar-based pricing."
• "My firm got the product at a cheap price, but in general, I believe that the product is a bit costly."
• "QlikView is more expensive than one of its competitors."

QlikView is predominantly used for analytics, reporting, and dashboard creation. Companies employ it to visualize data, track business metrics, and consolidate multiple data sources. It supports sales operations, inventory management, financial maintenance, and data integration processes. It serves industries like healthcare, manufacturing, and hospitality by providing business intelligence capabilities. Users appreciate QlikView for its data visualization, BI functionalities, and real-time reporting, allowing insightful decision-making across various business units and functions.

Customer service and support for QlikView are generally rated highly, with many users praising the efficiency and professionalism of the service. Responses are typically quick whether through direct support or community channels. Many find value in the vibrant user community for resolving issues. Service quality can vary by region and partner, but most users express satisfaction and appreciation for the support model. Some suggest it could be improved for more proactive engagement.

QlikView's initial setup is mostly described as straightforward and simple, even for users with limited technical knowledge. While some complexity arises with additional features or larger deployments, the process remains manageable. Documentation is clear, and users appreciate the ease of installation. Occasionally, technical expertise is beneficial, particularly for server environments, but many users can proceed with minimal assistance. Users have successfully implemented QlikView in short timeframes.

QlikView is known for its scalability, with organizations highlighting its adaptability for various user counts and data sizes. It requires significant hardware, especially memory, due to its in-memory technology. Users often optimize performance with additional RAM and server upgrades. While it generally scales well horizontally and vertically, some note potential issues with high concurrent users. Performance depends on server configuration and user numbers, leading to differing experiences in scalability ranking.

Users report that QlikView is generally stable, with performance heavily dependent on infrastructure. While some experienced issues with large data sets, crashes, or resource constraints, many have not faced stability problems. They rate its stability between eight to ten out of ten compared to competitors like Power BI. QlikView handles large data effectively but demands robust hardware for optimal performance. Overall, it is considered a reliable and stable tool by most.