Red Hat Ceph Storage Reviews

Pricing and setup of Red Hat Ceph Storage are influenced by internal expertise. Organizations confident with Ceph may opt for a vanilla version, while others should seek verified partners for support. It's often bundled with OpenStack subscriptions. Costs vary based on storage needs, with some only paying for support. Perceptions of price range from reasonable to potentially high, but many find it well-priced for enterprise use. Licensing generally covers specific storage capacities.

• "I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
• "The operational overhead is higher compared to Azure because we own the hardware."
• "The price of Red Hat Ceph Storage is reasonable."

Red Hat Ceph Storage is primarily used for cloud storage, integrated within OpenStack and Kubernetes environments. Organizations utilize it for hyperconverged systems, block storage, object storage, and backend solutions for OpenShift. It supports OpenNebula, NFS, CIFS, and media storage applications. Companies often integrate it alongside traditional storage solutions such as Pure and Dell. It's favored by distributors who deal with Red Hat ecosystems, offering a vital component for various cloud-based deployments.

Red Hat Ceph Storage users encounter diverse experiences with customer service and support. Some find technical support effective and quick, especially with the customer portal and direct communication channels. Others manage internally or rely on community and online resources due to previous unsatisfactory experiences with Red Hat. While many report quick and knowledgeable tech support, some suggest improvement in response times. Overall, community support is highly valued, particularly among those using open-source versions without vendor support.

Users found Red Hat Ceph Storage's initial setup challenging due to its complexity and the need for understanding its underlying technology. Those with Unix/Linux knowledge found it manageable, especially with tools like ceph-deploy. Adequate hardware planning and a thorough understanding of Ceph’s architecture are crucial. While documentation aids significantly, preparing the infrastructure and procuring hardware can be time-consuming. Expertise is often required to ensure a smooth deployment, which varies significantly in duration based on infrastructure.

Red Hat Ceph Storage offers impressive scalability with minimal issues. Adding nodes or disks generally boosts performance. It efficiently handles expanding demands and scales without major limitations. Some feedback mentions potential latency when expanding, while others noted complex configurations, requiring proper planning. Deployment tools aid in seamless scaling. Multiple organizations rate its scalability positively, supporting varied user bases. Planning and hardware considerations are important for optimal performance.

Stability of Red Hat Ceph Storage is generally positive with several users noting high reliability and no issues experienced. However, some challenges are mentioned during cluster expansion and when the replication factor is below three. Improvements can be made in data re-balancing algorithms. Expansion shows linear performance growth, though there are latency increases during recovery. Some users experience stability concerns in specific scenarios like virtual machine use. Stability ratings mostly vary between seven to ten.