UiPath Test Suite Reviews

Name: UiPath Test Suite
Brand: UiPath
Rating: 4.0 (23 reviews)

4.0 out of 5

23 reviews
86% willing to recommend

What is UiPath Test Suite?

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

Get the UiPath Test Suite Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about UiPath Test Suite, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and more!

UiPath Test Suite is the #4 ranked solution in top Test Automation Tools. PeerSpot users give UiPath Test Suite an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. Based on the analysis of the 23 most recent UiPath Test Suite reviews, the overall sentiment is positive, with a sentiment score of 7.3. UiPath Test Suite is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: UiPath Test Suite vs Tricentis Tosca. UiPath Test Suite is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 64% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 18% of all views.

Helped 825,661 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Deepak Digar.

QA Manager at Quorum Software

The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better. Building an automation test case from manual cases is easy, but sometimes we feel the process can get lengthy because we cannot create customized functions and the predefined ones are unsuitable for the particular purpose. We need to do a workaround that involves extra steps. I am unsure how UiPath will help with complex processes because they typically have multiple layers of various technologies. It also depends on the data synchronization. For example, if I have posted something in the front end, how long does it take to be reflected in the back end? That also matters because it's passing through different layers. End-to-end automation will be a little bit tricky because there are multiple front-end and back-end software involved. It is easy for either front-end or back-end testing. If we include the back end and front end to create an end-to-end scenario, it will be difficult because sometimes there are different databases and layers connected.

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Deborah Yarosh

VP Technology Automation at Finance Of America Mortgage LLC

UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment. The QA Manager needs to track which tests have been completed, the success rate, and other relevant information. The ability to have manual tests show up in multiple projects is a requirement that is not easily done in Test Suite. We have submitted the following enhancements request to UiPath and are waiting for them to address these issues before migrating our manual testing to the UiPath Test Suite platform. * Ability to import manual test cases from an Excel Spreadsheet. * Ability to create release folders and have manual tests under the folders (sub-folders are also needed). * Ability to copy tests between projects (manual and automated). * Ability to execute manual test cases in any order and skip tests if needed. * Ability to assign and see who has been assigned to test cases – need to know who created the test case and who executed the test case as they could be different people. * Ability for the QA manager to see which test cases have been run and which haven’t as well as which ones were successful, and which weren’t. * Ability for the QA manager to track defect cycles for a particular release. * Improving Search functionality – must enter the exact test case name in current search functionality. * Ability to extract key data for artifacts for Release Management or Audit* Test Set or Individual Cases, * Include Test Results (passed / failed), * Include how many iterations a test case went through until it passed.

Read full review

UiPath Test Suite mindshare

As of January 2025, the mindshare of UiPath Test Suite in the Test Automation Tools category stands at 4.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

PeerAnalyst reports

Type	Title	Date
Category	Test Automation Tools	Jan 6, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jan 6, 2025	Download
Comparison	UiPath Test Suite vs Tricentis Tosca	Jan 6, 2025	Download
Comparison	UiPath Test Suite vs OpenText UFT One	Jan 6, 2025	Download
Comparison	UiPath Test Suite vs Katalon Studio	Jan 6, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Tricentis Tosca	4.1	22.9%	96%	109 interviews Add to research
Katalon Studio	3.9	11.2%	89%	45 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

UiPath Test Suite's most valuable features include full integration of tools, ease of use with a low-code approach, robust automation capabilities across diverse technologies, streamlined maintenance, and significant cost savings. It enhances productivity through efficient test management, strong API integration, and reduced manual labor. Users appreciate its ability to automate various tasks, including mobile and desktop applications, and the simplicity of creating and running test scripts. It also excels in handling test scenarios with detailed logging.

"UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform."
"It is feature-rich. It has more features than other RPA tools."
"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."

Room for Improvement

UiPath Test Suite requires improvements in mobile automation, integration with third-party tools like Jira, and Orchestrator usability. Enhancements in manual testing, such as tracking and importing test cases, are needed. File management and test case handling present challenges. Better reporting, end-to-end synchronization, defect management, and automation capabilities could enhance its value. Efforts to integrate with AI, streamline test creation, and address bugs are ongoing, while cost and technical access remain concerns for some users.

"More precise logging would be appreciated."
"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."
"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

ROI

Many organizations experienced immediate benefits with UiPath Test Suite. It reduced power, execution, and maintenance costs, allowed quick setup, and simplified automation code migration. Some achieved an ROI of 70-80%, with significant reductions in required personnel. Monthly comparisons showed reduced manual execution costs. Users observed a decrease in total cost of ownership and faster test case development. Some entities noted savings of up to 150 hours monthly, with overall satisfaction in their investment returns.

Pricing

UiPath Test Suite is perceived as both cost-effective and expensive by users, with prices compared to major competitors. A single robot license is priced at 1,500 euros, while a five-user Test Suite license exceeds $10,000 USD. Although the licensing model requires purchasing upfront to handle volume peaks, it offers comprehensive features not available with competitors. However, many users feel that the price provides value for investment, considering the suite's extensive functionalities.

"Its price is a bit high."
"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."
"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

Popular Use Cases

UiPath Test Suite is used for a variety of testing scenarios, including regression, smoke, and web application testing. Teams automate testing for Windows .NET technologies, web applications, and mobile apps. It supports supply chain management, RPA, and integration with tools like Jira. Users employ it for testing workflows, onboarding processes, API automation, and document understanding. It simplifies complex processes, enhances test management capabilities, and reduces time-to-market and manual testing efforts.

Deployment

Many users find UiPath Test Suite's initial setup straightforward and quick, with familiarity easing the process. Deployment typically takes minimal time, especially with existing infrastructure or expertise. Learning UiPath's Test Manager may present a curve, but tasks like installation, activation, and orchestration run smoothly for most. While some encounter challenges with documentation or Orchestrator, ample training resources exist. Maintenance varies, yet automation reduces operational issues significantly, enhancing overall efficiency.

Scalability

UiPath Test Suite demonstrates impressive scalability, effectively supporting various business needs and extensive automation processes. While some challenges persist with integrations and specific testing scenarios, many acknowledge its flexibility, low-code features, and efficient handling of complex business modules and regression testing. Its scalability accommodates numerous users across different domains, though cost can increase with higher scaling needs. Continued updates enhance its capabilities, with room for improvement in handling existing functionalities.

Stability

UiPath Test Suite is generally stable with ratings mostly around seven to nine out of ten. Users find it easy compared to other automation tools, though occasional issues are noted, especially with Excel parameters and server access during peak times. Some face performance challenges in cloud deployments, leading to slow responses. Despite these issues, most users report minimal stability concerns, emphasizing its reliability in automation processes.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our UiPath Test Suite Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.