Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ACL Analytics based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include MEGA HOPEX, RSA Archer, and Workiva Wdesk.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Diligent Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Diligent, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
MEGA HOPEX focuses on integrated enterprise solutions suitable for comprehensive architecture and risk management. In comparison, ACL Analytics targets specialized data analytics with strong audit features. MEGA HOPEX's versatility appeals to integrators, while ACL Analytics's data prowess attracts those prioritizing analytical strength.
MEGA HOPEX incurs a flexible setup cost, while ACL Analytics presents a straightforward pricing structure. MEGA HOPEX appeals to those seeking tailored solutions, whereas ACL Analytics offers clarity and predictability in pricing.
MEGA HOPEX incurs a flexible setup cost, while ACL Analytics presents a straightforward pricing structure. MEGA HOPEX appeals to those seeking tailored solutions, whereas ACL Analytics offers clarity and predictability in pricing.
RSA Archer excels in integrating risk management across organizations, enhancing compliance and governance. In comparison, ACL Analytics focuses on data-driven insights with powerful analytics tools, making it ideal for companies needing advanced data analysis and intuitive setup.
RSA Archer has a higher setup cost, focusing on comprehensive enterprise risk management, while ACL Analytics offers a more affordable setup, targeting data analysis and auditing functionalities.
RSA Archer has a higher setup cost, focusing on comprehensive enterprise risk management, while ACL Analytics offers a more affordable setup, targeting data analysis and auditing functionalities.
ACL Analytics excels in data analysis with risk management and audit emphasis, appealing to those seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Workiva Wdesk attracts buyers with its integrated platform and cloud-based deployment, ideal for streamlining compliance and financial reporting processes.
ACL Analytics has a lower setup cost compared to Workiva Wdesk, highlighting a more cost-effective entry into data analysis, while Workiva Wdesk's higher setup cost may reflect its comprehensive suite of features for financial reporting and compliance.
ACL Analytics has a lower setup cost compared to Workiva Wdesk, highlighting a more cost-effective entry into data analysis, while Workiva Wdesk's higher setup cost may reflect its comprehensive suite of features for financial reporting and compliance.
SAP BusinessObjects GRC excels in risk management for large enterprises with complex compliance needs. In comparison, ACL Analytics is favored for its robust data analysis, ideal for organizations prioritizing in-depth insights. SAP offers scalable integration, while ACL provides cost-effective, data-driven solutions.
With SAS Enterprise GRC, you can standardize and manage strategic and operational risks, and consolidate information from all financial risk management systems (credit risk, market risk, etc.) into an enterprisewide view of risk.
Enterprise GRC Manager facilitates the holistic management of GRC programs while still addressing individual requirements with natively-built modules. This unified approach promotes overall insight, shared practices, re-use of work, efficiency, and cost savings and tackles the problem of siloed GRC responses without imposing a one-size-fits-all solution.
