ACL Analytics vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC comparison

Diligent and SAP are both solutions in the Continuous Controls Monitoring category. Diligent is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 6.7. Diligent holds a 21.2% mindshare in CCM, compared to SAP’s 12.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Diligent users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SAP users who would recommend it.

ACL Analytics

Read 11 ACL Analytics reviews

2,751 Views
963 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Read 7 SAP BusinessObjects GRC reviews

721 Views
274 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

ACL Analytics

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

SAP BusinessObjects GRC and ACL Analytics are products competing in governance, risk management, and compliance. SAP BusinessObjects GRC often leads in enterprise feature integration, while ACL Analytics is superior in data analysis capabilities.

Features: SAP BusinessObjects GRC provides risk management and regulatory compliance features with seamless integration into SAP applications, managing large-scale enterprise data and automating compliance processes. ACL Analytics offers data analysis and audit tools that highlight data patterns, risk identification, and deliver comprehensive analytics. SAP stands out in integration, whereas ACL is more adept at in-depth analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP BusinessObjects GRC deployment is suitable for large enterprises but can be complex and demanding. ACL Analytics promotes a simpler deployment process with quick operational readiness, complemented by accessible customer support. The complicated nature of SAP's setup contrasts with ACL's efficient deployment leading to rapid analytics execution.

Pricing and ROI: SAP BusinessObjects GRC involves substantial initial costs, which may delay ROI, yet it's preferred by enterprises needing integrated solutions. ACL Analytics offers a cost-effective setup yielding quick ROI due to its analytical focus and lower implementation costs. SAP is ideal for integration seekers, whereas ACL provides cost-efficiency and quick value through its analytical strengths.

To learn more, read our detailed ACL Analytics vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACL Analytics

Ranking in Continuous Controls Monitoring

1st

Ranking in GRC

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Ranking in Continuous Controls Monitoring

2nd

Ranking in GRC

12th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Continuous Controls Monitoring category, the mindshare of ACL Analytics is 21.2%, down from 27.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP BusinessObjects GRC is 12.4%, down from 20.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Continuous Controls Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ACL Analytics	21.2%
SAP BusinessObjects GRC	12.4%
Other	66.4%

Continuous Controls Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer2707797

ACL Consultant

Have significantly reduced audit hours through automation and advanced data integration with robust connectors

The key feature of ACL Analytics is integration, which allows for vast amounts of data sources you can connect to. The tool itself allows you to integrate it into your audit work in terms of taking exceptions that you receive from your analytics. It provides integration into your GRC platform and into your audit working files, and then one key thing is the vast amounts of connectors. We have seen a return on investment as we have mostly reduced working hours for the audit engagements. If an auditor was normally budgeted to take 600 hours, we have implemented a solution to take those audit hours down to 200 hours. We are mostly taking those metrics.

Read full review

Vishal Guthula

Sr Advanced Analytics Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Experienced security and easy understanding with advanced customization enhances efficiency

Regarding automation, they could enhance features for checking real-time data when someone attempts to access data without proper permissions. Currently, we do not receive immediate alerts; we only discover issues after something goes wrong. Having prevention alerts immediately when someone triggers unauthorized actions would allow us to address these situations proactively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of ACL Analytics is its powerful data control capabilities."

"I did not have any problems with the stability of ACL Analytics."

"Initial setup is straightforward."

"We apply different methods, such as sampling, data manipulation, and sorting. I'm fond of the scripting feature, which automates routine tasks and saves time. It also offers data insights."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spreadsheets or other documents for incorporation into reports is particularly helpful."

"It is very flexible and has hundreds of functions."

"I rate ACL Analytics nine out of ten."

"ACL Analytics is a great application that helps me analyze data more effectively compared to other tools like Excel."

More ACL Analytics pros

"The customization options in the dashboards inside SAP BusinessObjects GRC are highly valuable, and the real-time monitoring feature performs effectively, allowing teams to maintain data security by restricting domain visibility."

"The stability of SAP BusinessObjects GRC is acceptable."

"Initial setup was straightforward. It took maybe one week."

"The tool helps create reports for projects, including the creation of any ad-hoc reports"

"We have enterprise clients for the product."

"It is wonderful from the control perspective. The GRC tools help you in knowing what are the risk controls, how to mitigate risks, and how to ensure that there are no conflicts between the roles. From the user perspective, you get to know what are the permission risks and access risks. You get a lot of useful information."

"The best features are the scalability and flexibility to implement applications on top of the BW."

Cons

"Currently, the platform is not very comfortable for users coming from a non-technical or non-coding background."

"The product's pricing has increased over the years."

"It would be beneficial if the software could improve its capabilities when extracting data from databases, particularly for those who may not be familiar with SQL queries."

"The ease of use could be better."

"We have an issue with the hard coding of passwords in ACL Analytics. You do not have an interface where you can enter a password and then it can be encrypted when you enter it."

"The tool's pricing is quite high. When I purchased the software, I constantly contacted the representatives. I requested a single license, but they informed me that only packages of three licenses were available. This made it very difficult for us to manage the cost, especially given the economic challenges in our country."

"A person must have someone teach them how to use ACL Analytics as a common person cannot use it independently."

"Reporting and presentation of information directly to solutions, such as PowerPoint."

More ACL Analytics cons

"I am working on features that are not functioning as expected, which creates significant difficulties in management."

"Currently, we do not receive immediate alerts; we only discover issues after something goes wrong."

"An additional feature I would like to see is the option to add wait time and integrate sources in wait time."

"Technical support could be better and faster."

"BusinessObjects is very dated. It is not that user-friendly. It should be made more user-friendly. In addition, if they could make predictive analytics an embedded part of it where people get to know what is there to offer, it would be great."

"I think the old system is better than the new one. From an improvement perspective, the tool needs to ensure that the new technologies it offers are better than the old ones."

"We cannot actively log in to the system. It should also improve support."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for me as an individual seems a lot. For our organization, the price is okay. It's about $6,000 a year. I don't know of any additional costs."

"The price of $5,000 is high, and transferring money from one country to another, particularly in dollars, is challenging due to high exchange rates. Although we managed to purchase it then, the lack of a single license option and the high cost were issues."

"SAP BusinessObjects GRC is expensive."

"The product's licensing costs involve a one-time purchase. The tool also allows others to make annual payments towards the licensing charges of the product."

"There is a yearly licensing cost. I would rate their pricing 4 out of 5."

"The license is costly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Controls Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACL Analytics?

The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACL Analytics?

I would rate the pricing of ACL Analytics as a 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ACL Analytics?

We have an issue with the hard coding of passwords in ACL Analytics. You do not have an interface where you can enter a password and then it can be encrypted when you enter it. Every time you enter...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

The tool helps create reports for projects, including the creation of any ad-hoc reports

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP BusinessObjects GRC?

I work with SAP, and currently I am working with other domains such as Power BI, Microsoft, and in the AI sector. When working with Microsoft, I utilize solutions such as Intune, Configuration Mana...

See all answers

Comparisons

CaseWare IDEA SymSure Monitor vs ACL Analytics

Compared 21% of the time

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs ACL Analytics

Compared 15% of the time

AuditBoard vs ACL Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs ACL Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

RSA Archer vs ACL Analytics

Compared 7% of the time

More ACL Analytics Competitors

Security Weaver vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 16% of the time

RSA Archer vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 15% of the time

IBM OpenPages vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 14% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 9% of the time

CaseWare IDEA SymSure Monitor vs SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Compared 8% of the time

More SAP BusinessObjects GRC Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics

January 2026

Download ACL Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP BusinessObjects GRC

December 2025

Download SAP BusinessObjects GRC product report

Also Known As

ACL

BusinessObjects GRC

Overview

ACL Analytics connects you to any data source, and lets you run sophisticated risk analytics and detect anomalies or patterns that you simply can't illuminate with any amount of random sampling, spreadsheet ninjutsu or generic business intelligence. It's designed for you, the GRC professional.

Diligent

SAP GRC helps you automatically detect, remediate, and prevent access risk violations - no matter the industry or business size. Get real-time visibility into your current risk position, and confidently reduce unauthorized access, fraud, and the cost of compliance.

SAP

Sample Customers

Essar Group, Dean Foods, Lafarge North America, Austrian Ministry of Finance

INEOS Melamines GmbH, Banco Galicia

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC

December 2025

Free Report: ACL Analytics vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC

Find out what your peers are saying about ACL Analytics vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ACL Analytics vs. SAP BusinessObjects GRC report.

See our list of best Continuous Controls Monitoring vendors and best GRC vendors.

We monitor all Continuous Controls Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.