Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ACL Analytics vs MEGA HOPEX comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.3
MEGA HOPEX's scalability receives mixed reviews, excelling for some but facing challenges with high-volume tasks and licensing costs.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.3
MEGA HOPEX integrates business processes with IT strategies, offering customizable tools, interactive dashboards, and efficient stakeholder collaboration.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.0
MEGA HOPEX needs improved reporting, stability, user interface, integration, and documentation to enhance usability and customer appeal.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
MEGA HOPEX's recent versions show improved stability, scoring 7-9/10, with better performance on Windows, handling users effectively.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.2
MEGA HOPEX support is praised for responsiveness and skill, though customization challenges exist; quality varies by region.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
MEGA HOPEX pricing varies annually, with costs seen as high by some users, ranging $2,000-$3,000 per user.
 

Categories and Ranking

ACL Analytics
Ranking in GRC
6th
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Controls Monitoring (1st)
MEGA HOPEX
Ranking in GRC
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Architecture Management (4th), Business Process Design (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the GRC category, the mindshare of ACL Analytics is 4.1%, down from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MEGA HOPEX is 1.5%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
GRC
 

Featured Reviews

Sohail Ahmed - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps to save time and useful for data analytics
The tool's pricing is quite high. When I purchased the software, I constantly contacted the representatives. I requested a single license, but they informed me that only packages of three licenses were available. This made it very difficult for us to manage the cost, especially given the economic challenges in our country. The price of $5,000 is high, and transferring money from one country to another, particularly in dollars, is challenging due to high exchange rates. Although we managed to purchase it then, the lack of a single license option and the high cost were issues. I had trouble getting my issue across when I posted a problem with screenshots on the forum. The support team initially didn't seem to understand my problem and replied with general questions. I had to send more emails to explain it better. I think their support could be better. We expect support people to know the software well and understand our issues.
Navi Thejesh - PeerSpot reviewer
Interactive with good functionality and helps with productivity
The latest version is HOPEX WiFi. HOPEX can be on the cloud and accessed from anywhere within the given access network area. It is very interactive. We can do things from anywhere, and all the applications will work as specified. We can generate documents and can publish the documents. We can create a data match and visualize graphs and everything. Everything can be generated from the web interface itself. It has good functionality. We can develop our own customizations and meta models to define requirements, in-house business functions, and requirements. MEGA is already defined by global standards. A company can adapt to global standards and work in such a way to design its own methodology to define its structure. The interface is very good.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
8%
Educational Organization
42%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
6%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACL Analytics?
The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spr...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACL Analytics?
The licensing cost for ACL Analytics is around $6,000, which includes both SCA and hybrid functionalities. There are no extra fees.
What needs improvement with ACL Analytics?
The tool's pricing is quite high. When I purchased the software, I constantly contacted the representatives. I requested a single license, but they informed me that only packages of three licenses ...
Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?
Hi @Cheryl Joseph ​Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then Le...
 

Also Known As

ACL
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Essar Group, Dean Foods, Lafarge North America, Austrian Ministry of Finance
Aetna, Fannie Mae, M&T Bank, Glatfelter Insurance Group, Zions Management Services Company, The College Board, Baxter Credit Union, AXA Financial, Missouri Department of Conservation, New York State OTDA, MEG Energy Corp, Walgreens, Procter & Gamble, Biogen Idec, Gilead Sciences, Organic Valley, Trinity Health, Nissan and Ford
Find out what your peers are saying about ACL Analytics vs. MEGA HOPEX and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.