The primary use for AlgoSec is managing firewalls and to introduce a workflow system for requesting access through firewalls, which is fully integrated with them.
IP network expert at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Improves efficiency and network visibility, scalable, and has good technical support
Pros and Cons
- "It provides faster go to market with fewer resources."
- "I would like to be able to see what objects have the same IP, but different names in different firewalls."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
It provides faster go to market with fewer resources. In one system, users are able to request access through the firewall for business services, which can be approved by the appropriate team and can be implemented automatically by the system itself. Furthermore, users are able to track whether one particular access is blocked on any of firewalls or not, etc.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable modules are Firewall Analyzer and FireFlow. FireFlow is the workflow system, whereas Analyzer is the module responsible for tracking the configuration of firewalls, routers, switches, load balancers, etc.
There are many more useful features that cannot be listed here in a detailed manner.
What needs improvement?
I would like to be able to see what objects have the same IP, but different names in different firewalls. Since the system is able to show all of the objects for the integrated devices, it can be confusing if one particular object (eg. IP address/host) has different names in different firewalls.
Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
February 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d09a/3d09ae4d87808101515aff47a788c8a5df4338de" alt="PeerSpot Buyer's Guide"
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,737 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using AlgoSec for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have not experienced any problem with the system.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The system can be run on virtual machines, so we don't have any issue with scalability.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate the technical support with five stars. :-)
We always received the necessary help quite fast, and the answers were valuable.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We didn't have a similar system before this solution.
How was the initial setup?
It was not so complex and didn't take more than several days until we integrated all of the important networking devices.
What about the implementation team?
It was implemented by a vendor, they had the necessary expertise.
What was our ROI?
Actually, I cannot really estimate because I am responsible for the operation of the system. I can say that we have saved some resources with the automatic implementation feature.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I propose to purchase licenses for all of the networking devices in the network, because if not all of the devices are integrated then the query of particular access cannot be discovered entirely.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have chosen this system after evaluation (RFQ). The other competitor was Tufin.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90183/9018307dff0f8424d9744886ad50d7f0f7915caf" alt="PeerSpot user"
Works with 10,001+ employees
Provides a live network map and allows for the testing of hypothetical rules and policies
Pros and Cons
- "It assists us in network security reviews and audits."
- "Priority should be to improve the user interface for the risk and compliance part, making it more responsive and user-friendly."
What is our primary use case?
We have deployed the first brick of AlgoSec solution suite, Algosec Firewall Analyzer (AFA).
We wanted to get a live Network Mapping and to directly be able to check if a flow is allowed or not, without needing to test and then check the logs. We also need to check for compliance, baselines, and risks over our network.
How has it helped my organization?
This solution provides visibility and comprehension of the network in our organization. It assists us in network security reviews and audits. In the end, a lot of time, we add context and build a security matrix matching our own standards. The optimization tools are much appreciated by the network operators.
What is most valuable?
The What-if analysis allows us to check the security rating under hypothetical rules that may be implemented on our firewalls.
Baseline compliance allows you to run and check the results of commands on the Firewalls and Routers. This solution is perfect for checking compliance against best practices, as proposed by the CIS.
What needs improvement?
The user interface is better than some competitors, but it is starting to get old. Space is not always fully used, especially for the risk and compliance part. As example today, Excel file should be used to deal with network segment definition and risk matrix, it is hard to do it directly from user interface and there is no way to organize, order a set of test.
Priority should be to improve the user interface for the risk and compliance part, making it more responsive and user-friendly.
For how long have I used the solution?
Six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have had no problem with stability to this point. We have High Availability and have tested it correctly. Disaster recovery mode is also available.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability seems to be one of the strongest points of this solution. Worldwide architecture with remote agents, or slave master architecture. Be careful in terms of how you will deal with the log management as to not impact your network. A distributed architecture can help.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have one ongoing ticket to solve an issue with SSO. They are working on it seriously.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not use another solution prior to this one.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is long. The more knowledge you have of your network, the faster it will be.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented with the help of Orange Cyberdefense.
Their expert is very good, and honest with respect to the solution's capabilities.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Licenses are provided by firewall and routers. Do not underestimate the number of routers because the price can be significantly reduced as you buy more licenses. Same if you go for more than one product (i.e. FireFlow, BusinessFlow)
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
February 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d09a/3d09ae4d87808101515aff47a788c8a5df4338de" alt="PeerSpot Buyer's Guide"
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,737 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Deputy CISO/ Security Architect at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I have found the firewall optimisation feature to be very valuable
What is our primary use case?
I use AlgoSec for my firewall rule optimisation, compliance baseline auditing, firewall change reviews, etc.
How has it helped my organization?
AlgoSec has helped tighten the rules on my firewalls, reduce the risks or exposure, and also meet regulatory compliance.
What is most valuable?
I have found the firewall optimisation feature to be very valuable because most developers don't know the ports or services their applications are running. After running the rules on any services for a short while, AlgoSec helps get the right service ports and IP addresses.
What needs improvement?
The product or service could be improved by orchestration or automation that will help in changing the rule sets on the firewalls based on the detected used services/ports and IP addresses.
For how long have I used the solution?
One to three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
AlgoSec has been very stable compared with its pairs.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution's scalability is impressive.
How are customer service and technical support?
Service/technical support are good at their job and responsive.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No, I didn't.
How was the initial setup?
It is quite easy to deploy and manage.
What about the implementation team?
Implemented through a vendor and their level of expertise is high.
What was our ROI?
Worth every penny, and the value realisation is great.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
AlgoSec is worth every penny for the value or return of investment.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
No evaluations. AlgoSec was recommended, and we got a trial version for a period.
What other advice do I have?
None.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Works at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It helped us clear out almost half the work by identifying the rules automatically with no manual work.
What is our primary use case?
We have been using AlgoSec mainly to review/filter duplicate firewall rules and policies.
How has it helped my organization?
It helped us clear out almost half the work by identifying the rules automatically with no manual work, which is very cool.
What is most valuable?
The analysis and visualization part has given us a great insight into our perimeter security architecture. Also, the top 100 policy report usage is a pretty cool feature that I like the most. It also helps us from an auditing standpoint as well to make sure we meet our compliance demands.
What needs improvement?
I think the product is great from an overall observation, sometimes speed is an issue but I think it could be improved a little bit from a parsing perspective.
For how long have I used the solution?
Less than one year.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Cyber Security/ Network Intelligence Professional at EliteVAD
ALGOSEC - Automate Firewall Security Policy Orchestration
What is most valuable?
- Granular visibility
- Risk rules evaluation
- Saves with manual processes and dependencies
How has it helped my organization?
- Saves person-hours
- Security tightening and optimization in minutes
- Loophole identification which helps with compliance
- Effective tracking and automation of change management
What needs improvement?
Automated policy push for the Fortinet product family. The Active Change/Automated Policy push feature is already there for all other leading devices such as Cisco, Check Point, Juniper, and Palo Alto, etc.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used it for two years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
It's not hard to deploy, and can be run on a virtual environment.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a robust easy to use platform.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It has highly scalable architecture.
How is customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
The customer service team is reliable.
Technical Support:They have time-zone matched technical/SLA support and local response team available.
How was the initial setup?
It is pretty straightforward and a piece of cake for the network engineers.
What about the implementation team?
Initial implementation is highly recommended to be done through a vendor and/or subject matter expert so you can leverage the best of the features.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
AlgoSec is a best of class solution with unique value proposition. Licensing has flexibility perpetual and subscription models, and by identifying your own real needs can achieve savings.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
As a fair evaluation, other solutions are available in the security policy cleanup area. However, AlgoSec stands apart with a visionary business centric approach – not limiting itself to a mere firewall security cleanup tool. With AlgoSec, we also get an automated security change management/compliance solution. It has the unique and powerful application connectivity auto-discovery and then translates these to firewall rules. This is useful to achieve automation during datacenter migration, etc.
What other advice do I have?
AlgoSec is a business-driven security management solution, a comprehensive and visionary solution which covers what needs to be covered in firewall security visibility, security change management, and application-security connectivity. AlgoSec as a platform fills the gaps between the otherwise disconnected teams - Security, Network and Applications - within an organization.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We are value added distributors of the solution and are confident that we have the best choice in helping customers manage security at the speed of business.
Works at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Reduces time and costs of firewall change management, risk mitigation, and compliance audits.
What is most valuable?
- Intelligent policy tuning helps to reduce risk and improve device performance
- Traffic simulation query on a specific device
How has it helped my organization?
AlgoSec reduces time and costs of firewall change management, risk mitigation, and compliance audits.
What needs improvement?
AlgoSec should support these features:
- Expired time should be one of the components of firewall rules, not only source, destination
For example: Now, in Algosec Fireflow, when creating a change request, there are only 3 component: Source, Destination and Service. I want to have expired date of the traffic
- Detect duplicate objects in different firewalls
Now, Algosec can only detect duplicate object within one firewall. I want to detect in different firewalls
For example: firewall 1 has objet A with IP address 1.1.1.1, firewall 2 has object B with also IP address 1.1.1.1. I want Alogsec to detect this duplication
- Show IP address of object in a report, query result
Now, in report, query results, Algosec only displays name of the objects. I want to display IP address of these objects
For how long have I used the solution?
3 years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No, we haven't encountered any issues.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No, AlgoSec is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No, AlgoSec fit our size and is scalable.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
Very good.
Technical Support:Good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was simple.
What about the implementation team?
Via a partner, they're very good.
What was our ROI?
We haven't calculated ROI yet, but AlgoSec saves us labor and a lot of time.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Tufin, we selected AlgoSec because it provide some useful features that other solution didn't have.
What other advice do I have?
AlgoSec is very helpful for our organization.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Sr. IT Security Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
We use it to clean up unused objects. The risk team uses it to validate existing traffic flow.
Valuable Features
- Firewall rule monitoring
- Consolidated report on unused objects and rules
Improvements to My Organization
We use this tool for rule monitoring and cleaning up the unused objects to improve performance. The risk team uses this tool to validate the existing traffic flow for their approval.
Room for Improvement
It is currently unable to export the report to a CSV file, and I look forward to seeing it in the next version/release.
Use of Solution
I have used it for more than four years.
Deployment Issues
Deployment was very easy; the vendor-provided documentation was good.
Customer Service and Technical Support
Technical support is 8/10.
Implementation Team
I was able to implement it on my own.
Other Advice
It's a very useful product and I highly recommend everyone having this product in place on their security infrastructure.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
System Engineer at Dimension Data
Enables us to analyze and optimize our firewall by evaluating the rules and services
Pros and Cons
- "The features that are most valuable are the interactive topology map and the traffic simulation queries."
- "The MAP has a persistent issue with a firewall that is using a double BVI (Bridge virtual interface)."
What is our primary use case?
The AlgoSec Firewall analyzer has helped us to analyze and optimize our firewall by evaluating the rules and services. These include routing, access rules, and restricting both applications and servers.
How has it helped my organization?
This solution has helped my client to analyze and assess whether any service or routes are needed for connections that are going to be created. It has also optimized the efficiency of the firewall by evaluating the rule set.
This solution helps us to save time, making the job more efficient for our network engineer.
What is most valuable?
The features that are most valuable are the interactive topology map and the traffic simulation queries.
The MAP helps us by generating a network topology map and checking the routing table for every device that is connected. The traffic simulation queries help us to check the connection between two objects. This allows us to gather information about the devices pertaining to blocked traffic or services that we need to add.
What needs improvement?
The MAP has a persistent issue with a firewall that is using a double BVI (Bridge Virtual Interface). In this configuration, it cannot give the correct and proper topology, so the traffic simulation query cannot run properly between the source and destination.
For how long have I used the solution?
Less than one year.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have used other firewall products and it is very complex to check if any connections are down or blocked.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90183/9018307dff0f8424d9744886ad50d7f0f7915caf" alt="PeerSpot user"
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: February 2025
Product Categories
Firewall Security ManagementPopular Comparisons
Tufin Orchestration Suite
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud
FireMon Security Manager
Skybox Security Suite
Palo Alto Networks Panorama
AWS Firewall Manager
Azure Firewall Manager
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
Fortinet FortiPortal
Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Opinnate
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- From your experience, what are the technical differences between AlgoSec and FireMon?
- What Is The Biggest Difference Between AlgoSec and FireMon?
- What is the biggest difference between AlgoSec and Tufin?
- What is your opinion on Fortinet FortiManager vs AlgoSec? Are they complementary?
- What are the differences between Palo Alto Networks Panorama and AlgoSec?
- Which lesser known firewall product has the best chance at unseating the market leaders?
- Comparing network security vendors and devices
- When should companies use SSL Inspection?
- When evaluating Firewall Security Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What are the most important features you would be looking for in a firewall?