AlgoSec Reviews

• Risk management for the rules
• Policy optimization suggestions

AlgoSec allows me to understand the inside of the firewall and brings simplicity to very complex firewall setups.

It has helped us manage PCIDSS compliance and also improved the overall network security.

The product has several compliance checks built in for PCIDSS, ISO, SOX, etc., and also a baseline security policy. It would be nice to allow customers to build their own policy, based on the customer’s own customization and business needs.

I have used it for four years.

The application is easy to deploy in an hour and can be done via a user guide.

Support needs are rare. I only require support around twice a year. Upgrades are easily done by the user but when support is required, it is great.

Initial setup is easy because it is a virtual appliance with its own OS.

I have expertise in implementation and prefer to do it myself rather than invoke the support contract. I believe it helps me stay knowledgeable and besides, AlgoSec implementation is a breeze.

The license is perpetual but support is periodic.

I tried the ManageEngine firewall analyzer. AlgoSec has a superior firewall policy optimization algorithm.

It’s a good buy for simplifying large networks.

• Firewall analyzer
• Change management system

• Change management system
• 3D view of your firewall configuration
• Tool intelligence, highly useful for information security
• Design point-of-view

I've used it for two years.

I wasn't involved in the deployment; I just use it as a firewall engineer.

Sometimes due to server database size, the disk gets exhausted and then there is slowness over the internet.

Customer Service:

I haven't been involved with contacting AlgoSec.

Technical Support:

I haven't been involved with contacting AlgoSec.

I haven't used any other solution.

I was not the one who made the decision, but I have been supporting for customer.

Firewall Analyzer (AFA) to analyze configs from production firewalls of various types.

AFA has helped us to spot risky rules, overlapping rules and helps prioritize remediation efforts. We have a variety of firewalls and look forward to expanding services such as FireFlow.

In AFA, the ability to trend rule usage and drill into traffic seen hitting that rule is powerful for cleanup of overly permissive rules.

One to three years.

No issues with stability.

No issues with scalability.

Customer service has been helpful and responsive.

Skybox Security. However, Skybox is has less actionable output than Algosec. 

Setup does take some time to customize to your environment.

• Rule optimization
• Risk analysis

Saves time and labor cost in optimizing and operating our firewall system.

Find duplicate objects in different firewalls.

3 years

Mainly with log collection.

No issues.

None.

Customer Service:

Good.

Technical Support:

Good.

No.

Simple to setup.

Via a vendor team. They are good.

I don't have the details, but it is effective.

No.

It should support IPS devices.

We use AlgoSec for automating and management of security changes to our firewall policies.

AlgoSec makes it easier to implement flow-opening requests by our users. We now have a standard procedure that everyone must follow, whereby they create an AlgoSec request for any change to the firewall policy. The product also helps us to keep track of every change that occured in the past.

AlgoSec also provides us an easy way to review the policies of all of our firewalls. We are able to perform searches for specific rules/objects on all of them at the same time, even if they are from different vendors.

Firewall Analyzer is valuable because it makes searching our existing policies so simple.

We like FireFlow because it provides an easy way to introduce flow-opening requests.

They can make some improvements to the user interface because it can be slow at times.

We have been using AlgoSec for three years.

It provides us with a trail of changes. It also has an optimization advisor.

The audits for the firewalls are now straightforward.

The regulatory compliance rules.

I've been using it since March 2015, and I'm responsible for the deployment and administration of it.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

Customer Service:

It's very good, nothing to complain about.

Technical Support:

It's excellent, their support is fast and very competent.

I didn't use a similar solution previously.

It was straightforward.

We used a vendor team who covered all the aspects, and requirements, of the product.

No other options were evaluated.

I used AlgoSec for risk assessment and managing firewall rules, including risk assessment and firewall policy automation.

My use of AlgoSec included the FireFlow module, which is a firewall automation tool. Additionally, AlgoSec's risk analysis module was beneficial.

The user interface for AlgoSec has remained unchanged for the last ten years and could benefit from being more interactive and informative. Additionally, a cloud offering as a SaaS would relieve the burden of managing hardware, applying numerous patches, and monitoring the health state of the solution. Implementing a SaaS service would allow for immediate value realization.

I used AlgoSec from 2020 to 2025, approximately four to five years.

I rate the stability at eight out of ten, indicating a reasonably stable solution.

I rate the scalability at nine out of ten, demonstrating a robust ability to expand and cater to large enterprises.

I rate customer service at six or seven out of ten. Both response time and quality need improvements. While there is a dedicated engineer program that provides consistent support, regular support without this subscription is lacking.

Neutral

At my previous company, I used AlgoSec but shifted to using Tufin in my current role.

The setup process for AlgoSec is fairly simple.

Pricing for AlgoSec is fairly competitive. Rating the pricing on a scale from one being high to ten being low, the price is considered competitive without being specified absolutely.

I currently work with Tufin and have observed that AlgoSec is slower in adopting new technologies like cloud compared to Tufin and FireMon. Tufin and FireMon are leaders in technology change adoption.

My overall rating for AlgoSec, based on my last experience in January, would be seven out of ten. AlgoSec is suitable for enterprises that manage about 300 firewalls, and the burden on the solution is more about the number of firewalls and policies managed rather than the number of users. For technical functionality, I find Palo Alto to be better since AlgoSec does not support time-based objects or specific categorization groups.

On-premises