Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Asif  Meem - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at Sportsbet
Real User
Top 5
A tool with large online community support for model deployment, hosting, and monitoring that is expensive
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution is easy to scale...The documentation and online community support have been sufficient for us so far."
  • "The pricing of the solution is an issue...In SageMaker, monitoring could be improved by supporting more data types other than JSON and CSV."

What is our primary use case?

We use Amazon SageMaker for model deployment, hosting, and monitoring.

What is most valuable?

There is a lot of control in the solution over which terms you want to pick and choose. You don't have to pick the end-to-end machine learning operation solution. You can just choose deployment or training if you want, a benefit I saw in the solution.

You can leverage AWS's accelerated hardware to run your machine learning models, which is beneficial for improving a model's performance in terms of runtime, which is how long it takes to execute. Amazon SageMaker is an AWS product, and the company I work for already hosts all its services on AWS. Everything works well together if you're already on AWS.

What needs improvement?

Amazon SageMaker is expensive. It is more expensive than Databricks because it has a pay-as-you-go model with SageMaker.

The pricing of the solution is an issue.

In SageMaker, the monitoring does not support data captured in a protocol called protobuf since it only accepts JSON and CSV. We use protobuf to exchange messages. We have to write our own logic to serialize protobuf, which is more work, and it'd be better if SageMaker provided out-of-the-box support for that.

In SageMaker, monitoring could be improved by supporting more data types other than JSON and CSV. Amazon SageMaker can start with Protobuf since it is a popular messaging protocol.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Amazon SageMaker for six months. We are using the latest version of the solution. My company has a partnership with Amazon.

Buyer's Guide
Amazon SageMaker
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about Amazon SageMaker. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I can't comment on the solution's stability because it's still in production.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is easy to scale.

We have B2C Customers for the product, which would include over two million monthly recurring users.

How are customer service and support?

I have not contacted Amazon regarding the support.

The documentation and online community support have been sufficient for us so far.

How was the initial setup?

There is nothing to install since it is all cloud-based.

Deployments are a matter of minutes, depending on what kind of tool you use. I use AWS CDK for deployment, and with CDK, if you know what you're doing, it takes 15 minutes.

The solution is deployed on a public cloud.

The number of people required for deployment depends on the company and how fast they want to get it done. I had once completed PoC and the implementation part, and it took me some time, but deploying it alone is not an end-to-end solution. The deployment process requires the expertise of data scientists to build the model and an engineer to deploy it. Deployment would involve a maximum of two individuals.

What about the implementation team?

Technically, you shouldn't need anyone because it's AWS-managed services.

What was our ROI?

The solution's worth depends on the company's use cases. For us, the solution is valid because we already run on AWS.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There is no license required for the solution since you can use it on demand.

What other advice do I have?

Amazon SageMaker is definitely not the best product out there. I recommend that one can quickly do prototyping on SageMaker. It is easy to take your workload to the AWS Cloud. Amazon SageMaker's setup is very fast, so you'll be able to validate all your hypotheses pretty fast.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Arhum Naeem - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud AWS Fellow at Bytewise Limited
Real User
Top 5
Enhancing learning with intuitive model training and helpful support
Pros and Cons
  • "I appreciate the ease of use in Amazon SageMaker."
  • "I would recommend having more walkthrough videos and articles beyond AWS Skill Builder."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case of Amazon SageMaker is for training a small AI module for learning purposes. It was used for the training of a small machine learning model.

What is most valuable?

I appreciate the ease of use in Amazon SageMaker. I have not explored many features, as I am not deeply involved yet, but I aim to enhance my skills in the future. 

Based on my existing experience, it was straightforward to train a small machine-learning model. I initially used AWS Skill Builder for guidance, making it manageable without encountering challenges. 

In scalability, I found it highly scalable, having used the Jupyter notebook and other tools. By scaling the model, I've had a positive experience.

What needs improvement?

I would recommend having more walkthrough videos and articles beyond AWS Skill Builder. There should be additional articles within the services.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In terms of stability, I have not experienced any breakdowns. Although I have heard reports that it might break, I have personally never faced any issues with the stability of Amazon SageMaker.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I found that Amazon SageMaker is highly scalable. I used the Jupyter notebook and explored other available tools, which were useful depending on what I utilized. I plan to enhance my model in the future, which will allow me to share more about scalability once I fully scale the models.

How are customer service and support?

The support team of Amazon is excellent. I found them to be very good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not used anything else in cloud computing. Amazon SageMaker was my entry-level experience in cloud computing.

What other advice do I have?

I would give Amazon SageMaker a solid score of eight out of ten since I have not used much of its services. 

Based on the small model I trained, I would recommend it to others. I have already recommended it to some colleagues, batchmates, and fellows. My advice to newcomers would be to look for walkthrough videos and articles to aid in their learning.

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Usama Jamil - PeerSpot reviewer
Usama JamilWeb Developer and Designer at Oasis Infobyte
Real User

Thank you, Arhum, for such a well-written and insightful article! Your clear explanations and practical examples made the topic so much easier to understand. This has been incredibly helpful, and I’m excited to apply these insights to my own projects. Looking forward to reading more from you.🙌🙌

Buyer's Guide
Amazon SageMaker
February 2025
Learn what your peers think about Amazon SageMaker. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer2592534 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Scientist at a marketing services firm with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 10
Comprehensive with good machine learning platform and an easy setup and
Pros and Cons
  • "SageMaker is a comprehensive platform where I can perform all machine learning activities."
  • "I had to create custom templates for labeling multi-data sets, such as text and images, which was time-consuming."

What is our primary use case?

I am currently using SageMaker for a range of tasks including data cleaning, data visualization, exploratory data analysis, data labeling, training, and deploying models. I am also using it for machine learning projects.

How has it helped my organization?

Amazon SageMaker has accelerated our machine learning development, improved scalability, optimized resource use, and reduced costs, enabling us to deliver faster, more efficient, and scalable ML solutions.

What is most valuable?

SageMaker is a comprehensive platform where I can perform all machine learning activities. Specifically, the notebook feature is beneficial because it allows me to do everything from data cleaning to model training, dataset transformation, and data visualization on a single platform.

What needs improvement?

I had to create custom templates for labeling multi-data sets, such as text and images, which was time-consuming. It would be appreciated if SageMaker made it more adaptable for different types of datasets instead of just specific ones.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There have been no performance or stability issues with SageMaker.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

SageMaker is scalable.

How are customer service and support?

I have not used customer support services. However, I did receive notifications regarding resource usage, such as a restart notice during long computations.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have worked with generative AI, LLM models, APIs from Google, GPT, and Llama.

I switched because Amazon sagemaker comprises of most activities I needed from other different solutions. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was very straightforward with a left-side panel aiding in easy navigation. It was quite simple and user-friendly.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

If you are not on the free tier, SageMaker might be expensive, especially if you forget to shut down running applications. However, since I am using some free-tier services, cost efficiency is not a concern for me.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have worked with other solutions such as generative AI models and APIs from other providers. I have used Jupyter notebook via Anaconda, VSCode and Google Collab for my day to day machine learning tasks.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend SageMaker because it serves as a one-stop solution where everything needed for machine learning can be done in a single platform, without looking for other platforms to perform individual tasks.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
reviewer2587194 - PeerSpot reviewer
Partner & Chapter | Management - NodeJS - Java - C# - Python at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
Streamlined MLOps with user-friendly cost management and scalable data handling
Pros and Cons
  • "It's user-friendly for business teams as they can understand many aspects through the AWS interface."
  • "Amazon might need to emphasize its capabilities in generative models more effectively."

What is our primary use case?

We use Amazon SageMaker for a specific project involving an airline company to analyze historical flight data. Initially, we created a proof of concept locally and then developed a data pipeline to enhance the flow for large data models. This project benefited from SageMaker's ability to handle large data with TensorFlow, leading to a more efficient MLOps process.

How has it helped my organization?

SageMaker has streamlined the process for us, particularly in handling TensorFlow and making data management auto-scalable. This has allowed for a more efficient process, especially when discussing with DevOps about MLOps capabilities.

What is most valuable?

The most important feature is the ease of controlling costs with pricing calculators, which is crucial due to our limited budget. The low-code MLOps aspect simplifies data science work and makes it accessible for engineers without a DevOps background. It's user-friendly for business teams as they can understand many aspects through the AWS interface.

What needs improvement?

While not specific to SageMaker, I've observed a trend where companies are more attracted to the marketing of Gemini and GPT, leading some to migrate their pipelines to these platforms. Amazon might need to emphasize its capabilities in generative models more effectively.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

SageMaker has proven to be stable with only one issue in our history, which is impressive.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Before SageMaker, pipelines were created manually. Since using SageMaker, I've been impressed with its high scalability, rating it a ten out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

We have used free support tickets, and the response time is normal, usually in one or two days.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was not complex, taking us about one month to fully understand and set it up, with the actual setup time being around one to two weeks.

What about the implementation team?

We managed the implementation with two people focusing on understanding and making additional tests.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Compared to other top cloud services like Azure and Google Cloud in Brazil, AWS pricing is competitive and merits a rating of five out of ten.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We are migrating some models to Azure to evaluate its GPT enterprise version.

What other advice do I have?

It's important for new users to clearly define the testing process and understand what they aim to achieve. SageMaker facilitates a fast, secure, and scalable MLOps process.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: consultant
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Subhash Vaid - PeerSpot reviewer
VP, Principal at Axtria - Ingenious Insights
Real User
Simplifies the end-to-end machine learning process but there is room for improvement in the user experience
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker for me is the model deployment service."
  • "Amazon SageMaker could improve in the area of hyperparameter tuning by offering more automated suggestions and tips during the tuning process."

What is our primary use case?

I use Amazon SageMaker to develop modules with data stored in AWS, extracted from SAP. After building the modules, I deploy them to assess their performance and efficiency.

How has it helped my organization?

Amazon SageMaker has significantly enhanced our organization by consistently introducing new features like model tracking and recently integrating with MLflow. This integration provides me with increased flexibility for experimentation, making it easier to explore and implement innovative solutions.

The most beneficial feature for streamlining my machine learning workflows in Amazon SageMaker is MLflow. It allows me to experiment more effectively before finalizing decisions which enhances the progress of my machine learning projects.

Amazon SageMaker's integration with Jupyter Notebooks has significantly improved my data exploration and experimentation process. The built-in IDE is excellent and has been useful from the beginning, providing a seamless and effective platform for my work.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker for me is the model deployment service. Serving the model is crucial because it seamlessly scales with the operation of the model, providing efficient infrastructure that adapts to the scaling needs, and ensuring optimal performance.

What needs improvement?

Amazon SageMaker could improve in the area of hyperparameter tuning by offering more automated suggestions and tips during the tuning process. Having integrated intelligence to suggest hyperparameters would be beneficial for optimization.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Amazon SageMaker for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate the stability as a six out of ten since there is room for improvement in the user experience to enhance both scalability and stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability of Amazon SageMaker as a seven out of ten. We have about ten users of it at our company.

How are customer service and support?

The tech support for Amazon SageMaker is not good, especially for new users. There is a need to scale and improve support services to provide better assistance for users, particularly those who are less experienced with the platform. I would rate the support as a five out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

I would rate the easiness of the initial setup as a six out of ten. The process of using Amazon SageMaker has some challenges, mainly due to the complexity of multiple components. Streamlining the deployment process with better scripting support would be beneficial, addressing the difficulties associated with managing various moving parts in the platform.

The deployment process in Amazon SageMaker is smooth once the initial setup is done. Integrating with other AWS services like RDS is a key aspect, requiring attention to connections and overall integration for a successful deployment.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I would rate the costliness of the solution as a six out of ten. It could be a bit cheaper.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I evaluated other options like ML Studio and a few others but chose Amazon SageMaker because of my familiarity with their services and features.

What other advice do I have?

I use Amazon SageMaker in our production environment for making predictions in batches, ensuring efficient and scalable processing of large datasets.

Overall, I would rate Amazon SageMaker as a six out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Abdulrahman Elbanna - PeerSpot reviewer
DEMI Instructor at a non-tech company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
Streamlined machine learning workflow with room for enhanced user interface
Pros and Cons
  • "SageMaker offers functionalities like Jupyter Notebooks for development, built-in algorithms, model tuning, and options to deploy models on managed infrastructure."
  • "The user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) of SageMaker and AWS, in general, need improvement as they are not intuitive and require substantial time to learn how to use specific services."

What is our primary use case?

In my projects, I work with Amazon SageMaker to do face recognition using Amazon SageMaker and Amazon Lex. The platform is used for integrated development and utilizes features like Amazon Cognition for analyzing images and videos, as well as comparing images.

How has it helped my organization?

Amazon SageMaker provides a structured workflow from data sourcing, data processing, and data labeling to model training and deployment. This end-to-end workflow simplifies tasks and avoids confusion with other platforms, enhancing our efficiency. Moreover, its performance is commendable, especially in terms of computing speed, saving time effectively.

What is most valuable?

SageMaker offers functionalities like Jupyter Notebooks for development, built-in algorithms, model tuning, and options to deploy models on managed infrastructure. These features simplify the end-to-end machine learning workflow, including data labeling, preparation, reprocessing, training, deployment, and monitoring.

What needs improvement?

The user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) of SageMaker and AWS, in general, need improvement as they are not intuitive and require substantial time to learn how to use specific services. 

Additionally, the platform struggles with tuning large models, which is a significant limitation.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with SageMaker for five or six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I haven't faced any performance or stability issues with SageMaker.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Adding additional resources or scaling up to meet demand is not as straightforward as I would like.

How are customer service and support?

I have not had any experience interacting with customer support or technical support for SageMaker.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not used other AI development platforms like Azure or GCP in my current work. My use of SageMaker is based primarily on its integration into our existing workflows.

How was the initial setup?

I can't remember the initial setup process clearly after three months. However, there was a learning curve involved when I began using SageMaker.

What about the implementation team?

I am unsure about the size of the implementation team specific to the use of SageMaker, however, it was used by our team of ten people.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is based on usage, and I find it reasonable for what we use it for.

What other advice do I have?

I suggest SageMaker for anyone looking to facilitate an end-to-end machine learning workflow, from preparing data to deploying models, due to its comprehensive feature set.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Arun Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at Planfirma Technologies Private Limited
Reseller
Top 5Leaderboard
A fantastic tool for short-term use with quick deployment and integrated machine learning model development
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker is SageMaker Studio."
  • "While integration is available, there are concerns about how secure this integration is, particularly when exposing data to SageMaker."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for Amazon SageMaker involves saving infrastructure requirements by deploying machine learning or AI models. Instead of preparing new servers, which incurs a high cost, we use SageMaker to develop models temporarily. We use SageMaker services only for the short duration needed to create AI models and then terminate them.

How has it helped my organization?

Amazon SageMaker has helped our organization manage infrastructure costs by avoiding the need to set up new, costly servers for our AI model development. It provides a ready-made platform that allows us to quickly start our machine learning projects and is beneficial for short-term projects.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker is SageMaker Studio. It is a web-based, integrated model that allows numerous connections and includes all steps needed for machine learning development. The visual steps provided in the Studio are highly beneficial. Additionally, the advanced monitoring feature helps us keep track of infrastructure usage.

What needs improvement?

While integration is available, there are concerns about how secure this integration is, particularly when exposing data to SageMaker. Enhancing encryption and overall security could uplift the platform and build more trust among users. Another area of improvement is the cost, which can become quite high during prolonged use.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been working with Amazon SageMaker for about one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Amazon SageMaker is quite stable. We have never had to reinstall or reconfigure it, indicating that whatever we set up initially worked well. However, the stability score is eight because users occasionally run into issues.

How are customer service and support?

The support from Amazon SageMaker is very good. The chat support is well-maintained, and support team members possess in-depth knowledge about SageMaker, providing immediate help. However, the wait times for support can occasionally delay assistance.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Amazon SageMaker is quite easy. The online help from AWS is comprehensive, and their support team is knowledgeable. Ample documentation and expert chat support make the setup process smooth, although some might run into issues during the setup.

What was our ROI?

Amazon SageMaker provides a ready-made tool and platform that allows quick initiation of AI models, which is of interest to many. However, the long-term cost can be high if used continuously, which can affect its adoption for regular, ongoing use.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The license cost for Amazon SageMaker ranges between seven thousand to fifteen thousand dollars per month depending on various factors such as the model, amount of data, and geographical locations involved.

What other advice do I have?

Amazon SageMaker is a fantastic tool for short-term use. The billing increases significantly for prolonged use, but for short-term projects, it is quite economical. For those considering it, it is highly recommended that they use it for quick, temporary projects and then move out.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Data Scientist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
A solution with great computational storage, has many pre-built models, is stable, and has good support
Pros and Cons
  • "They are doing a good job of evolving."
  • "I would suggest that Amazon SageMaker provide free slots to allow customers to practice, such as a free slot to try out working with a Sandbox."

What is our primary use case?

I know about SageMaker and its capabilities, and what it can do, but I have not had any hands-on experience.

It's a machine learning platform for developers to create models.

What is most valuable?

There are pre-built solutions for everything. For example, if you want to build a deep learning model, we already have AlexNet, the internet, and all of the packages are inside. You don't have to recreate the same thing from scratch, but instead, you can use their models. You can use their model and use their data, then you can use your data.

I am a big fan of their computational storage capabilities. It's a relational database itself. It's a new SQL and you get different types of services. That is one of the best things that I like when doing my research.

I cannot quantify it as it is based on your requirements, but I can say that it's very flexible and you are able to increase all of the RAM and the GPU support.

They are doing a very good job on their end. They are evolving. I have learned that they have already integrated an IDE into Amazon SageMaker. They are doing a good job of evolving.

What needs improvement?

The pricing is complicated and should be simplified.

I would suggest that Amazon SageMaker provide free slots to allow customers to practice, such as a free slot to try out working with a Sandbox. This would be beneficial for newcomers, especially those who are getting into the cloud space. They could explore this area and get all of the aspects including data engineering, data recognition, and data transformation.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been familiar with this solution for three months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

From my findings, it's quite stable.

Amazon promises that they will provide you with stability, and it is quite a stable platform.

If you are facing any issues it may be related to the computational storage capability that you opted for. For example, if you are opting for a full code row and you have a lot of data that is taking a lot of time, then you have to go back to retrieve it. That flexibility is within the AWS, but you have to bear the cost.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's quite scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support is very good and I am satisfied with it.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I researched Amazon SageMaker on my own.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. It's not complex.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing is complicated as it is based on what kind of machines you are using, the type of storage, and the kind of computation. It is already decided, but if you want to have a look at how it is broken down or how they are calculating it, then they provide a tool where you can go and specify your options. These include what you want, how much storage, the RAM, and whether you want GPU support. You can include everything and then you can get the estimated cost.

AWS is an additional cost.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We are not with Anaconda Solutions, we use their packages. We are exploring their interface and it's capabilities. We are currently on a different tool, on a different platform. We are using their package managers to access the set of solutions deployed.

What other advice do I have?

I am not exposed to Amazon SageMaker but I know it's capabilities. I know exactly what we can do and how we can do it. We have been provided with several solutions for image processing, speech processing, and text processing. They have provided a built-in solution for every task. You can use tools for deploying your model, you just have to plug and play.

There is no cessation from what I can see. Whatever they have in the industry, they can solve 98% of the use cases.

There is also data engineering which is quite important. It's where the real work is done.

Amazon has already provided a free slot for each of the services that we have done. With Amazon SageMaker, however, I have not seen that.

I have not yet explored everything, but they are doing good work.

In terms of the dashboard, I can say that I have not explored the visualization aspect very much, but they have their tools. I don't know how flexible it is and how much customization you can do. That's something on the visualization side that I don't enjoy very much. My interests are mostly towards data engineering or data science.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Amazon SageMaker Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: February 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Amazon SageMaker Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.