Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon SageMaker vs Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
Amazon SageMaker offers significant ROI with cost reductions, time savings, and notable financial benefits, especially in fraud detection and targeted ads.
Sentiment score
6.6
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio offers improved efficiency and dataset summarization, with varying ROI perspectives and a 7/10 rating.
The return on investment varies by use case and offers significant value in revenue increases and cost saving capabilities, especially in real time fraud detection and targeted advertisements.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Amazon SageMaker customer service has mixed reviews, with satisfaction varying based on user experience, support promptness, and service tier.
Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio's customer service is praised for responsiveness but satisfaction varies, with larger clients receiving better support.
The technical support from AWS is excellent.
The support is very good with well-trained engineers.
Microsoft technical support is rated a seven out of ten.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Amazon SageMaker is highly scalable, handling diverse data needs effectively but may require deployment expertise for optimal efficiency.
Sentiment score
7.3
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio offers efficient scalability for various user bases, with potential improvements for complex deployments.
The availability of GPU instances can be a challenge, requiring proper planning.
Amazon SageMaker is scalable and works well from an infrastructure perspective.
We are building Azure Machine Learning Studio as a scalable solution.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Amazon SageMaker is stable and reliable, with minor issues mainly due to user configuration errors, not infrastructure problems.
Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is stable and reliable, with minor issues and concerns about classic version retirement.
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon SageMaker needs UI simplification, better documentation, cost efficiency improvements, enhanced security, scalability, training resources, and performance optimization.
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio could enhance usability, expand features, improve integration, and provide clearer pricing with better support.
Having all documentation easily accessible on the front page of SageMaker would be a great improvement.
Integration of the latest machine learning models like the new Amazon LLM models could enhance its capabilities.
This would empower citizen data scientists to utilize the tool more effectively since many data scientists do not have a core development background.
I find the pricing to be not a good story in this case, as it is not affordable for everyone.
In future updates, I would appreciate improvements in integration and more AI features.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon SageMaker is costly, especially for notebook instances, with better visibility needed to optimize pay-as-you-go costs.
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio offers flexible pricing from $20 monthly, but users find cost complexity challenging.
For a single user, prices might be high yet could be cheaper for user-managed services compared to AWS-managed services.
The pricing can be up to eight or nine out of ten, making it more expensive than some cloud alternatives yet more economical than on-premises setups.
The cost for small to medium instances is not very high.
I rate the pricing as three or four on a scale of one to ten in terms of affordability.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon SageMaker provides flexible AI/ML solutions with easy AWS integration, strong deployment features, and comprehensive tools for scalability.
Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio offers user-friendly features including AutoML, scalability, and integration for seamless team collaboration and deployment.
These features facilitate rapid development and deployment of AI applications.
SageMaker supports building, training, and deploying AI models from scratch, which is crucial for my ML project.
This allows monitoring and performance grading, as I instantly know when someone has a bad call.
Azure Machine Learning Studio provides a platform to integrate with large language models.
Machine Learning Studio is easy to use, with a significant feature being the drag and drop interface that enhances workflow without any complaints.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon SageMaker
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
3rd
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Azure Machine Lea...
Ranking in Data Science Platforms
4th
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
3rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Amazon SageMaker is 7.7%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is 5.7%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Science Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Hemant Paralkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Improves team collaboration with advanced feature sharing but needs a better user experience
Improvement is needed in the no-code and low-code capabilities of Amazon SageMaker. This would empower citizen data scientists to utilize the tool more effectively since many data scientists do not have a core development background. Additionally, dealing with frequent UI updates can be challenging, especially for infrastructure architects like myself. It involves effort to migrate to new UIs, making the updates not seamless. User auditing requires enhancements as tracking operations performed by users can be difficult due to dynamic IP validation and role propagation.
HéctorGiorgiutti - PeerSpot reviewer
Requires minimal maintenance, is scalable, and stable
The initial setup depends on the developer's knowledge of machine learning models as to whether it is easy or difficult. With a good understanding of these models, then we can get to work quickly in the environment. With 20 years of experience in IT, making applications on legacy platforms and non-web platforms, I have found that Azure has a very good implementation. The platform is so comprehensive that it doesn't matter what kind of work we do, we can find the tools needed to get the job done. In comparison to what I was doing five years ago, Azure is a great platform and I really enjoy working with it. We should allocate up to 12 percent of our project time to deployment. Depending on the complexity of the solution, we should expect to spend more time on deployment.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Educational Organization
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How would you compare Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker?
We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks. Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It...
What do you like most about Amazon SageMaker?
We've had experience with unique ML projects using SageMaker. For example, we're developing a platform similar to ChatGPT that requires models. We utilize Amazon SageMaker to create endpoints for t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon SageMaker?
Before deploying SageMaker, I reviewed the pricing, especially for notebook instances. The cost for small to medium instances is not very high.
Which do you prefer - Databricks or Azure Machine Learning Studio?
Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with ...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio?
The learning curve is very low. Operationalizing the model is also very easy within the Azure ecosystem.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio?
Pricing is considered to be top-segment and should be improved. I rate the pricing as three or four on a scale of one to ten in terms of affordability.
 

Also Known As

AWS SageMaker, SageMaker
Azure Machine Learning, MS Azure Machine Learning Studio
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DigitalGlobe, Thomson Reuters Center for AI and Cognitive Computing, Hotels.com, GE Healthcare, Tinder, Intuit
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Schneider Electric, BP
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon SageMaker vs. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.