Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon SageMaker vs Hugging Face comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon SageMaker
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
9.1
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Data Science Platforms (5th)
Hugging Face
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the AI Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Amazon SageMaker is 8.1%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hugging Face is 7.8%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Natu Lauchande - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 27, 2024
Easy to use and manage, but the documentation does not have a lot of information
We use the product for deploying machine learning models. We use it for the machine learning model development process We're currently implementing a project on a cross-selling model. It is like a standard XGBoost model. I’m evaluating the tool to see whether it will improve the workflow.…
AshishKumar11 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 25, 2024
Open-sourced, reliable, and enables organizations to finetune data for business requirements
Hugging Face is a website that provides various open-source models. We use them to finetune models for our business. It is just like ChatGPT, but ChatGPT has paid sources. If we have to call an API, we must pay for it. However, Hugging Face has various open-source models like Llama 2 and Llama 3…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker is that you don't have to do any programming in order to perform some of your use cases."
"The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker for me is the model deployment service."
"The deployment is very good, where you only need to press a few buttons."
"The few projects we have done have been promising."
"The tool has made client management easier where patients need to upload their health records and we can use the tool to understand details on treatment date, amount, etc."
"The Autopilot feature is really good because it's helpful for people who don't have much experience with coding or data pipelines. When we suggest SageMaker to clients, they don't have to go through all the steps manually. They can leverage Autopilot to choose variables, run experiments, and monitor costs. The results are also pretty accurate."
"The solution's ability to improve work at my organization stems from the ensemble model and a combination of various models it provides."
"Amazon SageMaker is highly valuable for managing ML workloads. It connects to AWS cloud resources, making it easy to deploy algorithms and collaborate using tools like GitLab. It offers a wide range of Python libraries and other necessary tools for modelling and algorithms."
"The tool's most valuable feature is that it shows trending models. All the new models, even Google's demo models, appear at the top. You can find all the open-source models in one place. You can use them directly and easily find their documentation. It's very simple to find documentation and write code. If you want to work with AI and machine learning, Hugging Face is a perfect place to start."
"The solution is easy to use compared to other frameworks like PyTorch and TensorFlow."
"What I find the most valuable about Hugging Face is that I can check all the models on it and see which ones have the best performance without using another platform."
"My preferred aspects are natural language processing and question-answering."
"Hugging Face provides open-source models, making it the best open-source and reliable solution."
"The product is reliable."
"There are numerous libraries available, and the documentation is rich and step-by-step, helping us understand which model to use in particular conditions."
"The tool's most valuable feature is that it's open-source and has hundreds of packages already available. This makes it quite helpful for creating our LLMs."
 

Cons

"One area where Amazon SageMaker could improve is its pricing. The high costs can drive companies to explore other cloud options. Additionally, while generally good, the updates sometimes come with bugs, and the documentation could be much better. More examples and clearer guidance would be helpful."
"The payment and monitoring metrics are a bit confusing not only for Amazon SageMaker but also for the range of other products that fall under AWS, especially for a new user of the product."
"AI is a new area and AWS needs to have an internship training program available."
"Amazon SageMaker could improve in the area of hyperparameter tuning by offering more automated suggestions and tips during the tuning process."
"There are other better solutions for large data, such as Databricks."
"The user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) of SageMaker and AWS, in general, need improvement as they are not intuitive and require substantial time to learn how to use specific services."
"When starting a new session, the waiting time can be quite long, ranging from two to five minutes."
"I would suggest that Amazon SageMaker provide free slots to allow customers to practice, such as a free slot to try out working with a Sandbox."
"I believe Hugging Face has some room for improvement. There are some security issues. They provide code, but API tokens aren't indicated. Also, the documentation for particular models could use more explanation. But I think these things are improving daily. The main change I'd like to see is making the deployment of inference endpoints more customizable for users."
"Hugging Face could improve by implementing a search engine or chat bot feature similar to ChatGPT."
"Implementing a cloud system to showcase historical data would be beneficial."
"The solution must provide an efficient LLM."
"The area that needs improvement would be the organization of the materials. It could be clearer and more systematic. It would be good if the layout was clear and we could search the models easily."
"It can incorporate AI into its services."
"Initially, I faced issues with the solution's configuration."
"Most people upload their pre-trained models on Hugging Face, but more details should be added about the models."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing could be better, especially for querying. The per-query model feels expensive."
"SageMaker is worth the money for our use case."
"The pricing is complicated as it is based on what kind of machines you are using, the type of storage, and the kind of computation."
"Databricks solution is less costly than Amazon SageMaker."
"The support costs are 10% of the Amazon fees and it comes by default."
"The solution is relatively cheaper."
"You don't pay for Sagemaker. You only pay for the compute instances in your storage."
"The tool's pricing is reasonable."
"The tool is open-source. The cost depends on what task you're doing. If you're using a large language model with around 12 million parameters, it will cost more. On average, Hugging Face is open source so you can download models to your local machine for free. For deployment, you can use any cloud service."
"Hugging Face is an open-source solution."
"I recall seeing a fee of nine dollars, and there's also an enterprise option priced at twenty dollars per month."
"The solution is open source."
"So, it's requires expensive machines to open services or open LLM models."
"We do not have to pay for the product."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Educational Organization
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
University
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How would you compare Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker?
We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks. Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It...
What do you like most about Amazon SageMaker?
We've had experience with unique ML projects using SageMaker. For example, we're developing a platform similar to ChatGPT that requires models. We utilize Amazon SageMaker to create endpoints for t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon SageMaker?
The license cost for Amazon SageMaker ranges between seven thousand to fifteen thousand dollars per month depending on various factors such as the model, amount of data, and geographical locations ...
What do you like most about Hugging Face?
My preferred aspects are natural language processing and question-answering.
What needs improvement with Hugging Face?
Hugging Face could improve by implementing a search engine or chat bot feature similar to ChatGPT. This would aid developers in easily finding how to fine-tune models with specific data or get mode...
What is your primary use case for Hugging Face?
I use Hugging Face primarily to work with open LLM models. I recently started using the open LOM models and also use embedding models. I use these models to train custom data and monitor our deskto...
 

Also Known As

AWS SageMaker, SageMaker
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DigitalGlobe, Thomson Reuters Center for AI and Cognitive Computing, Hotels.com, GE Healthcare, Tinder, Intuit
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon SageMaker vs. Hugging Face and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.