Amazon SageMaker vs IBM Watson Studio comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
10,980 views|8,670 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
3,009 views|1,956 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon SageMaker and IBM Watson Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Science Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon SageMaker vs. IBM Watson Studio Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We've had experience with unique ML projects using SageMaker. For example, we're developing a platform similar to ChatGPT that requires models. We utilize Amazon SageMaker to create endpoints for these models, making accessing them convenient as needed.""Feature Store, CodeCommit, versioning, model control, and CI/CD pipelines are the most valuable features in Amazon SageMaker.""We've had no problems with SageMaker's stability.""The tool has made client management easier where patients need to upload their health records and we can use the tool to understand details on treatment date, amount, etc.""The superb thing that SageMaker brings is that it wraps everything well. It's got the deployment, the whole framework.""The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker for me is the model deployment service.""We were able to use the product to automate processes.""The most valuable feature of Amazon SageMaker is that you don't have to do any programming in order to perform some of your use cases."

More Amazon SageMaker Pros →

"The scalability of IBM Watson Studio is great.""It has a lot of data connectors, which is extremely helpful.""Watson Studio is very stable.""The most important thing is that it's a multi-faceted solution. It's a kind of specialist, not a generalist. It can produce very specific information for the customer. It's totally different from Google or any search engine that produces generic information. It's specialty is that it's all on video.""IBM Watson Studio consistently automates across channels.""The system's ability to take a look at data, segment it and then use that data very differently.""The main benefit is the ease of use. We see a lot of engineers in our site and customers that really like the way the tools are able to work with the people.""The solution is very easy to use."

More IBM Watson Studio Pros →

Cons
"There are other better solutions for large data, such as Databricks.""The product must provide better documentation.""I would say the IDE is quite immature, but it is still in its infancy, so I expect it to get better over time.""In general, improvements are needed on the performance side of the product's graphical user interface-related area since it consumes a lot of time for a user.""I would suggest that Amazon SageMaker provide free slots to allow customers to practice, such as a free slot to try out working with a Sandbox.""Lacking in some machine learning pipelines.""AI is a new area and AWS needs to have an internship training program available.""Scalability to handle big data can be improved by making integration with networks such as Hadoop and Apache Spark easier."

More Amazon SageMaker Cons →

"The decision making in their decision making feature is less good than other options.""I think maybe the support is an area where it lacks.""I want IBM's technical support team to provide more specific answers to queries.""The solution's interface is very slow at times.""It's sometimes easy to get lost given the number of images the solution opens up when you click on the mouse and the amount of different tabs.""Initially, it was quite complex. For us, it was not only a matter of getting it installed, that was just a start. It was also trying to come up with a standard way of implementing it across the entire organization, which had been a challenge.""The main challenge lies in visibility and ease of use.""So a better user interface could be very helpful"

More IBM Watson Studio Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is complicated as it is based on what kind of machines you are using, the type of storage, and the kind of computation."
  • "The support costs are 10% of the Amazon fees and it comes by default."
  • "SageMaker is worth the money for our use case."
  • "Databricks solution is less costly than Amazon SageMaker."
  • "I would rate the solution's price a ten out of ten since it is very high."
  • "There is no license required for the solution since you can use it on demand."
  • "I rate the pricing a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest price, and ten is the highest price. The solution is priced reasonably. There is no additional cost to be paid in excess of the standard licensing fees."
  • "You don't pay for Sagemaker. You only pay for the compute instances in your storage."
  • More Amazon SageMaker Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Watson Studio's pricing is reasonable for what you get."
  • "IBM Watson Studio is a reasonably priced product"
  • "IBM Watson Studio is an expensive solution."
  • "The pricing is generally reasonable and straightforward but can vary significantly depending on the specific workloads in use."
  • More IBM Watson Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It… more »
    Top Answer:We've had experience with unique ML projects using SageMaker. For example, we're developing a platform similar to ChatGPT that requires models. We utilize Amazon SageMaker to create endpoints for… more »
    Top Answer:From an improvement perspective, I would say that if the deployment environment and IBM Watson Studio's environment are separated, then it would be good. I would like them to be one and offer users a… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    Views
    10,980
    Comparisons
    8,670
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    538
    Rating
    7.3
    11th
    Views
    3,009
    Comparisons
    1,956
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    426
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AWS SageMaker, SageMaker
    Watson Studio, IBM Data Science Experience, Data Science Experience, DSx
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Amazon SageMaker is a fully-managed platform that enables developers and data scientists to quickly and easily build, train, and deploy machine learning models at any scale. Amazon SageMaker removes all the barriers that typically slow down developers who want to use machine learning.

    IBM Watson Studio provides tools for data scientists, application developers and subject matter experts to collaboratively and easily work with data to build and train models at scale. It gives you the flexibility to build models where your data resides and deploy anywhere in a hybrid environment so you can operationalize data science faster.

    Sample Customers
    DigitalGlobe, Thomson Reuters Center for AI and Cognitive Computing, Hotels.com, GE Healthcare, Tinder, Intuit
    GroupM, Accenture, Fifth Third Bank
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Logistics Company11%
    Transportation Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Educational Organization13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company22%
    Insurance Company11%
    Marketing Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Educational Organization7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business71%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon SageMaker vs. IBM Watson Studio
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon SageMaker vs. IBM Watson Studio and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon SageMaker is ranked 5th in Data Science Platforms with 19 reviews while IBM Watson Studio is ranked 11th in Data Science Platforms with 13 reviews. Amazon SageMaker is rated 7.4, while IBM Watson Studio is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon SageMaker writes "Easy to use and manage, but the documentation does not have a lot of information". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Watson Studio writes "A highly robust and well-documented platform that simplifies the complex world of AI". Amazon SageMaker is most compared with Databricks, Azure OpenAI, Google Vertex AI, Domino Data Science Platform and Dataiku, whereas IBM Watson Studio is most compared with Databricks, Azure OpenAI, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, Google Vertex AI and Amazon Comprehend. See our Amazon SageMaker vs. IBM Watson Studio report.

    See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors and best AI Development Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.