Databricks vs IBM Watson Studio comparison

Databricks and IBM are both solutions in the Data Science Platforms category. Databricks is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. Databricks holds a 19.1% mindshare in Data Science Platforms, compared to IBM’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Databricks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Databricks

Read 85 Databricks reviews

17,588 Views
11,896 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Watson Studio

Read 14 IBM Watson Studio reviews

2,237 Views
1,406 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Databricks

IBM Watson Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Databricks and IBM Watson Studio compete in data science and analytics. Databricks seems to have an advantage in performance for large-scale data processing and Spark integration, while IBM Watson Studio excels in AI capabilities and offers a comprehensive suite of data science tools.

Features: Databricks is known for its ease in running large-scale analytics, built-in optimization recommendations, and support for collaboration in notebooks. It integrates seamlessly with Spark and offers notable machine learning capabilities. The scalability and support for multiple programming languages enhance its versatility with cloud integrations. IBM Watson Studio stands out for its AI capabilities, built-in data science tools like SPSS Modeler, and use of Jupyter notebooks, making it powerful for machine learning and data integration tasks.

Room for Improvement: Databricks could improve by expanding advanced visualization and machine learning libraries, enhancing ETL tool integration, and providing more user-friendly documentation and interfaces for popular BI tools. IBM Watson Studio could enhance its intuitive user experience, ease of deployment, and support for new AI features. Users often cite navigation challenges, desiring a more integrated interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Databricks offers versatile deployment options with support for public, private, and hybrid clouds. It provides comprehensive documentation, though technical support experiences vary. IBM Watson Studio also supports cloud and on-premises deployments. Its documentation is praised for clarity, with users reporting reliability that reduces the need for frequent technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Databricks operates on a pay-as-you-go model, seen as costly for extensive data usage but flexible and offering positive ROI by reducing infrastructure costs. IBM Watson Studio is viewed as reasonably priced for its features, although complex workloads may incur higher costs. Its pricing is generally considered straightforward, delivering beneficial ROI for large-scale data projects.

To learn more, read our detailed Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Databricks

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Streaming Analytics (1st)

IBM Watson Studio

Ranking in Data Science Platforms

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Development Platforms (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Data Science Platforms category, the mindshare of Databricks is 19.1%, up from 18.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Watson Studio is 2.1%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Science Platforms

Featured Reviews

Parag Bhosale

Senior Data Engineer at a logistics company with 51-200 employees

Integrating engineering and learning, but cost challenges arise with cluster management

We often use a single cluster to ingest Databricks, which Databricks doesn't recommend. They suggest using a no-cluster solution like job clusters. This can be overwhelming for us because we started smaller. We prefer using a small to mid-sized cluster for many jobs to keep costs low, but this sometimes doesn't support our operations properly. We need to stay in sync with the DVR versions, and migrations can pose challenges. For example, issues arose when we moved a cluster from a previous version to the latest one. We could use their job clusters, however, that increases costs, which is challenging for us as a startup. Maintaining this infrastructure can be a headache.

Read full review

Abilio Duarte

Senior Solutions Architect at Self-employed

A highly robust and well-documented platform that simplifies the complex world of AI

The main challenge lies in visibility and ease of use. Providing training sessions can be immensely helpful in helping users navigate and understand the tool's potential. This approach would empower users to explore and make the most of the tools and technologies at their disposal. Another area where IBM could enhance its offering is by providing more visibility to end users regarding the vast potential that Watson offers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the Spark cluster which is very fast for heavy loads, big data processing and Pi Spark."

"The solution is an impressive tool for data migration and integration."

"The time travel feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the hardware and the resources it quickly provides without much hassle."

"We can scale the product."

"When we have a huge volume of data that we want to process with speed, velocity, and volume, we go through Databricks."

"The most valuable feature of Databricks is the integration with Microsoft Azure."

"Databricks integrates well with other solutions."

More Databricks pros

"The most important thing is that it's a multi-faceted solution. It's a kind of specialist, not a generalist. It can produce very specific information for the customer. It's totally different from Google or any search engine that produces generic information. It's specialty is that it's all on video."

"The main benefit is the ease of use. We see a lot of engineers in our site and customers that really like the way the tools are able to work with the people."

"It stands out for its substantial AI capabilities, offering a broad spectrum of features for crafting solutions that meet specific requirements."

"It has greatly improved the performance because it is standardized across the company."

"For me, the valuable feature of the solution is the one that I used, which was Jupyter notebooks."

"Watson Studio is the most complete tool for AI projects."

"Technical support is great. We have had weekly teleconferences with the technical people at IBM, and they have been fantastic."

"The solution is very easy to use."

More IBM Watson Studio pros

Cons

"We often use a single cluster to ingest Databricks, which Databricks doesn't recommend. They suggest using a no-cluster solution like job clusters. This can be overwhelming for us because we started smaller."

"I would love an integration in my desktop IDE. For now, I have to code on their webpage."

"It would be nice to have more guidance on integrations with ETLs and other data quality tools."

"Databricks would benefit from enhanced metrics and tighter integration with Azure's diagnostics."

"I have seen better user interfaces, so that is something that can be improved."

"The interface of Databricks could be easier to use when compared to other solutions. It is not easy for non-data scientists. The user interface is important before we had to write code manually and as solutions move to "No code AI" it is critical that the interface is very good."

"The query plan is not easy with Databrick's job level. If I want to tune any of the code, it is not easily available in the blogs as well."

"Databricks has a lack of debuggers, and it would be good to see more components."

More Databricks cons

"I think maybe the support is an area where it lacks."

"The initial setup was complex."

"Some of the solutions are really good solutions but they can be a little too costly for many."

"One area that could be improved is the backup and restoration of the database and the overall database configuration."

"I want IBM's technical support team to provide more specific answers to queries."

"More features in data virtualization would be helpful. The solution could use an interactive dashboard that could make exploration easier."

"We would like to see it less as one big, massive product, but more based on smaller services that we can then roll out to consumers."

"Watson Studio would be improved with a clearer path for the deployment of docker images."

More IBM Watson Studio cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is based on a licensing model."

"The licensing costs of Databricks is a tiered licensing regime, so it is flexible."

"I rate the price of Databricks as eight out of ten."

"Databricks are not costly when compared with other solutions' prices."

"The pricing depends on the usage itself."

"It is an expensive tool. The licensing model is a pay-as-you-go one."

"The basic version of this solution is now open-source, so there are no license costs involved. However, there is a charge for any advanced functionality and this can be quite expensive."

"The solution is affordable."

More Databricks pricing and cost advice

"IBM Watson Studio is a reasonably priced product"

"IBM Watson Studio is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is generally reasonable and straightforward but can vary significantly depending on the specific workloads in use."

"Watson Studio's pricing is reasonable for what you get."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which do you prefer - Databricks or Azure Machine Learning Studio?

Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with ...

See all answers

How would you compare Databricks vs Amazon SageMaker?

We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks. Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Databricks or Azure Stream Analytics?

Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their orga...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Watson Studio?

Stability-wise, it is a great tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Watson Studio?

The pricing of Watson Studio is justified by the benefits and power it offers.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Watson Studio?

One area that could be improved is the backup and restoration of the database and the overall database configuration. There were also challenges with programming the network extension in the last p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dataiku vs Databricks

Compared 11% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs Databricks

Compared 8% of the time

Dremio vs Databricks

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon SageMaker vs Databricks

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Databricks

Compared 7% of the time

More Databricks Competitors

Google Vertex AI vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 17% of the time

Azure OpenAI vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon Comprehend vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 4% of the time

IBM SPSS Modeler vs IBM Watson Studio

Compared 3% of the time

More IBM Watson Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Databricks

January 2025

Download Databricks product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Watson Studio

January 2025

Download IBM Watson Studio product report

Also Known As

Databricks Unified Analytics, Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, Redash

Watson Studio, IBM Data Science Experience, Data Science Experience, DSx

Learn More

Databricks

Video not available

IBM

Overview

Databricks is utilized for advanced analytics, big data processing, machine learning models, ETL operations, data engineering, streaming analytics, and integrating multiple data sources.

Organizations leverage Databricks for predictive analysis, data pipelines, data science, and unifying data architectures. It is also used for consulting projects, financial reporting, and creating APIs. Industries like insurance, retail, manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals use Databricks for data management and analytics due to its user-friendly interface, built-in machine learning libraries, support for multiple programming languages, scalability, and fast processing.

What are the key features of Databricks?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies operations and usability.
Built-in machine learning libraries: Facilitates machine learning tasks.
Support for multiple programming languages: Enhances flexibility.
Scalability: Efficiently handles growing data needs.
Fast processing: Improves performance and speed.
Automated optimization: Reduces manual efforts.
Data visualization: Provides insightful visuals.
Collaborative features: Enhances teamwork.
Delta Lake performance: Boosts data management.
Seamless cluster management: Simplifies system operations.

What are the benefits or ROI to look for in Databricks reviews?

Efficiency in handling large datasets: Ensures smooth processing.
Interactive workspace environment: Improves user collaboration.
Integration with platforms: Provides connectivity benefits.
Performance optimization: Enhances overall system performance.
Support for data governance and security: Ensures data integrity and protection.

Databricks is implemented in insurance for risk analysis and claims processing; in retail for customer analytics and inventory management; in manufacturing for predictive maintenance and supply chain optimization; and in pharmaceuticals for drug discovery and patient data analysis. Users value its scalability, machine learning support, collaboration tools, and Delta Lake performance but seek improvements in visualization, pricing, and integration with BI tools.

IBM Watson Studio provides tools for data scientists, application developers and subject matter experts to collaboratively and easily work with data to build and train models at scale. It gives you the flexibility to build models where your data resides and deploy anywhere in a hybrid environment so you can operationalize data science faster.

Sample Customers

Elsevier, MyFitnessPal, Sharethrough, Automatic Labs, Celtra, Radius Intelligence, Yesware

GroupM, Accenture, Fifth Third Bank

Buyer's Guide

Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio

January 2025

Free Report: Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Databricks vs. IBM Watson Studio report.

See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.