Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Anaplan based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Domo, IBM Planning Analytics, and Oracle Hyperion.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Anaplan Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Anaplan, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Domo offers a comprehensive suite with robust data handling and dashboards, beneficial for varied skill levels. In comparison, Anaplan excels in real-time connected planning and complex modeling. Domo provides flexible deployment, while Anaplan is preferred for large-scale analysis and enterprise integration.
IBM Planning Analytics offers advanced data integration and predictive analytics for organizations seeking comprehensive insights. In comparison, Anaplan provides flexibility and scalability, ideal for dynamic business environments. A tech buyer might choose based on preference for data manipulation or dynamic real-time collaboration.
IBM Planning Analytics has a lower setup cost compared to Anaplan, making it a more cost-effective solution for initial deployment. Anaplan, with higher setup costs, offers a more comprehensive feature set aimed at large-scale operations.
IBM Planning Analytics has a lower setup cost compared to Anaplan, making it a more cost-effective solution for initial deployment. Anaplan, with higher setup costs, offers a more comprehensive feature set aimed at large-scale operations.
Oracle Hyperion offers robust enterprise performance management, ideal for scalability and security. In comparison, Anaplan excels in flexibility and integration for collaborative modeling. Oracle Hyperion faces setup complexity, while Anaplan requires high costs but offers intuitive interfaces and real-time data updates.
Oracle Hyperion involves a complex setup process, potentially leading to higher initial costs, while Anaplan offers a streamlined setup with potentially lower initial costs.
Oracle Hyperion involves a complex setup process, potentially leading to higher initial costs, while Anaplan offers a streamlined setup with potentially lower initial costs.
Oracle HFM has a considerable setup cost focusing on large enterprises, while Anaplan offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup suited for various business sizes.
Oracle HFM has a considerable setup cost focusing on large enterprises, while Anaplan offers a more streamlined and cost-effective setup suited for various business sizes.
Anaplan excels in dynamic planning and scalability, making it ideal for sophisticated models and real-time data integration. In comparison, Workiva Wdesk offers compelling compliance and reporting features, attracting organizations needing robust risk management and seamless, accurate financial disclosures.
Anaplan has an upfront setup cost that users find relatively easy to manage, while Workiva Wdesk provides a flexible setup option that may appeal to businesses with specific integration needs, highlighting a key distinction in their implementation approach.
Anaplan has an upfront setup cost that users find relatively easy to manage, while Workiva Wdesk provides a flexible setup option that may appeal to businesses with specific integration needs, highlighting a key distinction in their implementation approach.
Board stands out with its data visualization and simpler deployment process. In comparison, Anaplan offers robust modeling and scalability advantages. Board appeals to those seeking cost-effective analytics, while Anaplan is ideal for enterprises needing complex planning solutions despite higher initial setup costs.
Board has a lower setup cost compared to Anaplan, which might appeal to users prioritizing initial investment savings. Anaplan’s setup cost is higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Board has a lower setup cost compared to Anaplan, which might appeal to users prioritizing initial investment savings. Anaplan’s setup cost is higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Anaplan excels in comprehensive functionality with adaptable features for complex forecasting, making it suitable for enterprise needs. In comparison, Jedox appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its intuitive Excel-like interface, flexible pricing, and seamless integration options, making it ideal for dynamic reporting.
Anaplan has a high setup cost compared to Jedox, which offers a more affordable initial investment. This cost difference makes Jedox an attractive option for businesses seeking a cost-effective solution for their financial planning needs.
Anaplan has a high setup cost compared to Jedox, which offers a more affordable initial investment. This cost difference makes Jedox an attractive option for businesses seeking a cost-effective solution for their financial planning needs.
Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud offers robust ERP integration and extensive features, ideal for large enterprises with complex needs. In comparison, Anaplan provides superior collaboration and flexibility, appealing to mid-sized businesses seeking user-friendly interfaces and scalable solutions suitable for dynamic scenario management.
Anaplan's flexibility appeals to businesses seeking scalable modeling and strategic decision-making tools. In comparison, CCH Tagetik stands out with its advanced financial consolidation and compliance features, making it ideal for organizations focused on comprehensive reporting and regulatory requirements.
Anaplan's setup cost is often higher due to its enterprise-focused offerings, while CCH Tagetik generally provides a more budget-friendly setup option, making it accessible to a broader range of businesses.
Anaplan's setup cost is often higher due to its enterprise-focused offerings, while CCH Tagetik generally provides a more budget-friendly setup option, making it accessible to a broader range of businesses.
Adaptive Insights attracts attention for its competitive pricing and ease of deployment, ideal for cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, Anaplan's advanced feature set and comprehensive capabilities justify its higher price, catering to organizations seeking detailed guidance and extensive functionality.
Anaplan excels in flexibility and scalability, attracting businesses seeking agile planning. In comparison, OneStream XF is preferred for its robust financial consolidation capabilities, appealing to those needing comprehensive financial management. Anaplan's cloud deployment contrasts with OneStream XF's customizable options, each catering to specific needs.
Anaplan offers dynamic planning and real-time data integration, supporting collaborative planning across finance and supply chain domains. In comparison, Software AG ARIS Process Mining provides robust process optimization and visualization tools, ideal for identifying inefficiencies and enhancing process analysis.
Anaplan involves a moderate setup cost, while Software AG ARIS Process Mining typically requires a higher initial investment. Anaplan offers straightforward implementation, contrasting with the potential for more complex deployment processes for Software AG ARIS Process Mining.
Anaplan involves a moderate setup cost, while Software AG ARIS Process Mining typically requires a higher initial investment. Anaplan offers straightforward implementation, contrasting with the potential for more complex deployment processes for Software AG ARIS Process Mining.
Planful attracts cost-sensitive buyers with accessible pricing and intuitive dashboards, excelling in budgeting and financial reporting. In comparison, Anaplan appeals to organizations needing advanced modeling and analytics for complex data, justified by higher costs but offering long-term scalability and significant ROI.
Pigment is ideal for financial planning, offering robust features like scenario analysis and budgeting capabilities. Users appreciate its intuitive design and flexibility. However, there is room for improvement in customization options and integration with other tools, which could enhance functionality and user experience.
