I'm a reseller and I supply these switches to customers.
The use case of this solution is to connect endpoint devices through to the data centers.
I'm a reseller and I supply these switches to customers.
The use case of this solution is to connect endpoint devices through to the data centers.
It has several awesome features. I actually prefer Aruba over Huawei.
With Aruba, some of the models that are available, you need simple features, but you have to go to very high models, very expensive models.
They need to come up with a bit more flexibility in their range of models.
I would like to see more flexibility with regard to the models that are available.
I've been using HP Switches for about 15 years, then when HP bought Aruba, it became Aruba and I started using it under the new name.
We use all of the versions that are available. I use the older Aruba OS Switches. I use the new Aruba CX Switches. It just depends on what the customer needs.
It's a very stable product.
Aruba Switches are very scalable.
The technical support is fantastic! Absolutely fantastic. We have no problems with their technical support.
The initial setup is straightforward. They are the easiest switches to work with.
The deployment time varies; if it's one switch then it will be quick. If it's a hundred switches, it will take a while.
here are no licensing costs for the Aruba Switches. However, there are licensing costs for some of their other solutions.
I would recommend it 100%. Absolutely no problem with it.
I would rate Aruba Switches an eight out of ten.
We use and sell the 800 series switch. We compare the Aruba switches to the comparable Cisco switches as they have a similar feature set. We can sell them primarily because they cost less than Cisco. We use the Virtual Switching Extension feature that Aruba has for better performance and high availability. Aruba switches can be used in small and large businesses.
We have found that the command line interface is very useful and very similar to Cisco devices. We have also found that the Aruba switches are very easy to use.
I would say that the customization of the switches could be easier to configure.
We have been using Aruba Switches for the last six to seven years.
Aruba switches are a stable solution.
Aruba switches are very scalable. It can be integrated with other solutions. They can be used with either ClearPass or Cisco ICE.
Aruba technical support is very useful. you can contact them with a global number. They answer very quickly, in a few minutes we have the engineer on the call. So the technical support seems better than Cisco from a support perspective.
This initial setup of Aruba switches is very simple. The length of the deployment depends on how many switches are, and what type of switches you're doing, access switches versus the distribution switches. With a larger deployment, we need to take the time to take appropriate order, depending upon the client, location, and all that.
We deploy the Aruba switches for our clients.
Aruba switches are cheaper than Cisco for a similar feature set. The licensing costs are also cheaper than Cisco.
We have also used Cisco switches and they provide a similar feature set.
I would rate Aruba switches at a nine out of a scale of ten.
We primarily use the solution for our IT infrastructure.
The solution is very reliable. It's easy to use with other solutions.
The pricing could be adjusted.
The interface could be more user-friendly and the dashboard could be improved.
Now and then there tend to be issues if we have a virtual stack. If there's a power failure, the switches come up at different times. This means we have to shut down the stack and then put them up in a proper way. Otherwise, we will have issues with the IP and those kinds of things. I should note that I've only seen this issue with the virtual stack.
The solution is scalable enough. The product itself is fantastic; I've had no issues with scalability. Currently, we have about 700 people using the technology.
The solution's technical support is okay. I would prefer more engagements around new products and roadmaps, however.
I've never used a different solution. At a previous company, we worked with Cisco switches, which I thought were good until I came to this job and saw you could get a cheaper solution that was just as good.
My network is segmented, however, it's not too complex. The last refresh we did was 2016 and that took us two days over a weekend.
We had a provider that assisted us with the implementation.
The pricing is decent. It's less expensive than Cisco.
We use both the cloud and on-premises deployment models.
I would recommend the solution, especially if you are on a tight budget and are looking for a no-nonsense product.
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
We're a government entity and use Switches for LAN and for pushing up to a router or a firewall. From an infrastructure perspective, we're a medium-sized organization but only have 100 employees. We are customers of Aruba and I'm a network engineer.
Black time warranty is a valuable feature.
Aruba's switches are older so I'd like to see more upgrades. The newer ones may have that built-in. The product could be more user-friendly.
I've been using this solution for 12 years.
The solution is very stable.
We scaled up easily and added a couple of blades to it.
I haven't used the tech support with HP but they were helpful when it came to replacing switches.
The initial setup was pretty straightforward; I did everything through the CLI and I'd had previous experience with the process. Aside from the firmware, there's almost no maintenance required.
Licensing costs are competitive with other solutions on the market.
I rate this solution eight out of 10.
We use this solution for small and middle sized offices across different locations. The switches connect to the remote sites for distribution to the end user.
We have needed to upgrade software to fix some challenges we experienced. After downloading the latest version of Aruba, these were fixed.
I have used this solution for three years.
The initial setup was straightforward. The time to deploy depends on the experience you have and how many switches you are setting up.
This is an affordable solution.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Aruba Central is very valuable to us.
I would prefer it if they reduced the cost of the switches and the access points. They are very high for a country like Sri Lanka. It's a good product, but the price is too high.
Here, most customers are interested in cheaper, local solutions like Planet Switches. I think Auba is better than the local solutions, but they need to cut the cost down in order for people to switch over to them.
I have been using Aruba Switches for three years.
Aruba Switches are both scalable and stable. I am pretty satisfied with this product.
Their technical support is pretty good. Actually, the first level of support is given by our supplier. Regardless of the time, they will help you.
Before Aruba, we worked with Cisco, but personally, I prefer Aruba.
The initial setup is very easy.
I'm not part of the configuration team. We have a team that handles all implementation and configuration. I am part of the design team.
I would recommend Aruba for anyone looking for a stable enterprise-level solution.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Aruba Switches a rating of eight. If they lowered the cost and introduced some basic-level features and access points, I would give them a higher rating. Basic Aruba access points are expensive in Sri Lanka.
The migration from older to newer products could be improved.
I've been using Aruba Switches for ten years.
Aruba Switches are quite stable.
Aruba Switches are scalable.
Aruba's technical support is good.
The initial setup was quite straightforward.
Aruba Switches are quite cost-effective.
Aruba has an advantage over their competitors because they specialize in delivery, which means they don't have the long delivery times that Cisco and others quote. I'd rate Aruba Switches eight out of ten.
Our primary use case is data center networking. We work with a hybrid deployment model. Currently, we are working with the 8325 switches. We have sold the solutions to a lot of our customers.
The thing that I have found most valuable about the Aruba product is that it is very stable. It provides great performance and reliability.
Our clients are really very satisfied with the service this product provides. I really see nothing for the moment that needs improvement. There was a new release at the beginning of this year that is currently available, so essentially it is a new product. It has kept up with good development.
The only improvement I can really see is that maybe they could get more competitive price-wise. Technically we are satisfied with the product.
I am a systems architect and ee have been using Aruba switches at our company for two years.
It is very stable. We have no trouble with the performance.
It is very scalable. It is a stackable switch and that gives it scalability.
We have not needed to use Aruba's technical support. The product has not given us any issues that require it.
The initial setup is very straightforward. The deployment takes only about half-an-hour. It is very fast.
Price-wise, the product is a little expensive compared to the competition.
My advice for people considering this solution is that I would recommend it. It is very stable, it is a high-performance switch for the mid-market segment. It is just a very good switch.
On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate Aruba Switches as a nine-out-of-ten. If I say that it is a ten it means that there is nothing more that they can improve. Everything can be improved. I think nine is a very good rating.