Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
AWS Application Migration Service Logo

AWS Application Migration Service pros and cons

4.1 out of 5
266 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the category report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Live, block-to-block replication is highly valued as a feature.
CloudEndure enables easy and simple use for migrations.
The service is reasonably priced compared to other options.
AWS Application Migration Service eliminates the need to take an image of a VM and efficiently finds the right equivalent compute instance automatically.
AWS Application Migration Service allows for migrations with minimal downtime.

CONS

CloudEndure defaults to creating one small, lightweight server in the cloud.
Live Migration has issues with target setups.
Additional logs and more detailed information are necessary for better client-side visibility.
Creating launch templates for multiple system types can be cumbersome.
Some Migration Factory features could be integrated into AWS Application Migration Service.
 

AWS Application Migration Service Pros review quotes

MB
Jun 7, 2020
The most valuable feature is the live, block-to-block replication.
Hussain-Shabbir - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 20, 2024
AWS Application Migration Service allows us to perform migrations with minimal downtime, which is crucial for our operations.
LS
Jun 14, 2023
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the solution's support a ten out of ten.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Zerto, Google and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: December 2024.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RK
May 11, 2022
The product is reasonably priced.
Jennifer G Chavez - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 22, 2024
AWS Application Migration Service makes it so you don't have to take an image of your VM on-site and find the right equivalent compute instance within AWS. It does that automatically in the background.
reviewer1972968 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 26, 2022
Live Migration's best feature is that it's free.
MB
Apr 28, 2022
The CloudEndure feature is most valuable because it is user friendly and very simple.
 

AWS Application Migration Service Cons review quotes

MB
Jun 7, 2020
One drawback to using CloudEndure is that the default is to give one small, lightweight server, which is created in the cloud.
Hussain-Shabbir - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 20, 2024
There are some features in the Migration Factory that could be integrated directly into AWS Application Migration Service.
LS
Jun 14, 2023
I think it is important to have more logs, and more details would be great because we have just logged on the client's side, but there weren't many details on the cloud.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Zerto, Google and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: December 2024.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RK
May 11, 2022
I do not see any improvements required for the CloudEndure.
Jennifer G Chavez - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 22, 2024
Navigating around creating launch templates when you have several types of systems can be cumbersome.
reviewer1972968 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 26, 2022
Live Migration has some issues with target setups.
MB
Apr 28, 2022
We would like to have a disaster recovery feature included in this solution.