Top 10 AWS CloudFormation Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

36 reviews
97% willing to recommend

Top AWS CloudFormation Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to AWS CloudFormation based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Configuration Manager, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, and VMware Aria Automation. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

AWS CloudFormation surpasses its competitors by offering seamless infrastructure as code, enabling automated provisioning, and ensuring consistent deployments with templates that simplify resource management while integrating easily with other AWS services for enhanced scalability and reliability.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Amazon Web Services (AWS), and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Configuration Manager

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Configuration Manager excels in managing on-premises environments with straightforward configuration and lower costs. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation offers more robust automation, scalability, and integration with AWS services, despite higher pricing. Configuration Manager provides dependable on-premises management, while CloudFormation's extensive cloud-native features make it ideal for dynamic cloud environments.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report

Pricing

Microsoft Configuration Manager has higher initial setup costs, whereas AWS CloudFormation offers lower upfront expenses, making it a more cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Configuration Manager has higher initial setup costs, whereas AWS CloudFormation offers lower upfront expenses, making it a more cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

4.3 out of 5

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform

4.3 out of 5

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers ease of use and flexibility for automating repetitive tasks. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation provides deep integration with AWS services for managing and provisioning resources. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is simpler to deploy, whereas AWS CloudFormation excels in comprehensive AWS integration and support depth.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report

Pricing

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers affordable setup costs, while AWS CloudFormation incurs higher initial expenses. Customers will notice a stark contrast in pricing between the two solutions during the initial implementation period.

View comparison

Pricing

VMware Aria Automation

4.0 out of 5

VMware Aria Automation

4.0 out of 5

VMware Aria Automation offers extensive customization and advanced policy settings, ideal for complex automation needs. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation excels in integration with AWS services, providing a seamless experience for AWS-focused users. VMware's flexibility contrasts with AWS's cost-efficiency and strong ROI from its tight integrations.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. VMware Aria Automation Report

Pricing

VMware Aria Automation has a moderate setup cost, while AWS CloudFormation generally presents a more cost-effective setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

VMware Aria Automation has a moderate setup cost, while AWS CloudFormation generally presents a more cost-effective setup option.

Red Hat Satellite

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Satellite

4.1 out of 5

Red Hat Satellite excels in customization and control, making it ideal for on-premises management. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation stands out with extensive integrations and cloud-native capabilities. Red Hat Satellite offers robust system management, while AWS CloudFormation excels in automation and template-driven deployments.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Red Hat Satellite Report

Pricing

Red Hat Satellite has a higher initial setup cost compared to AWS CloudFormation, which is more cost-effective for initial deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Red Hat Satellite has a higher initial setup cost compared to AWS CloudFormation, which is more cost-effective for initial deployment.

Puppet Enterprise

4.1 out of 5

Puppet Enterprise

4.1 out of 5

Puppet Data Center Automation helps sysadmins automate configuration and management of machines and the software running on them. With our software, businesses can make rapid, repeatable changes and automatically enforce the consistency of systems and devices, across physical and virtual machines, on prem or in the cloud.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Puppet Enterprise Report

Pricing

Puppet Enterprise’s pricing is competitive.

Puppet Enterprise can be an expensive solution for smaller businesses.

View comparison

Pricing

Puppet Enterprise’s pricing is competitive.

Puppet Enterprise can be an expensive solution for smaller businesses.

Chef

4.0 out of 5

Chef

4.0 out of 5

Chef is favored for its flexibility and multi-cloud management capabilities. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation excels with seamless AWS integration and built-in security features. Chef’s customizable nature is a draw, whereas AWS CloudFormation's efficient AWS setup makes it appealing. Chef offers predictable pricing, while AWS CloudFormation provides notable efficiency and ROI improvements within AWS.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Chef Report

Pricing

Chef has a straightforward setup cost, while AWS CloudFormation offers a more complex and potentially higher initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Chef has a straightforward setup cost, while AWS CloudFormation offers a more complex and potentially higher initial expense.

Spring Cloud

3.3 out of 5

Spring Cloud

3.3 out of 5

Spring Cloud excels in pricing and customer support, making it a favorite for budget-conscious users. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation, with its robust features and automation capabilities, stands out despite higher costs. Tech buyers might choose Spring Cloud for cost efficiency and AWS CloudFormation for comprehensive benefits.

Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud Report

Pricing

Spring Cloud offers a lower setup cost with extensive support, whereas AWS CloudFormation incurs higher initial expenses but provides extensive automation and integration capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Spring Cloud offers a lower setup cost with extensive support, whereas AWS CloudFormation incurs higher initial expenses but provides extensive automation and integration capabilities.

Related categories

Configuration Management

Server Monitoring

Patch Management