Discover the top alternatives and competitors to AWS Shield based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Cloudflare One, and Arbor DDoS.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Amazon Web Services (AWS), and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cloudflare is appealing for its easy integration and cost-effective plans suitable for businesses seeking performance and security. In comparison, AWS Shield offers in-depth security integration within AWS and advanced threat detection, which may attract enterprises fully immersed in AWS services.
Cloudflare’s setup cost is praised for its affordability, making it a cost-effective choice for many users, while AWS Shield’s setup is noted for its higher expense but includes comprehensive security features suitable for enterprise-level needs.
Cloudflare’s setup cost is praised for its affordability, making it a cost-effective choice for many users, while AWS Shield’s setup is noted for its higher expense but includes comprehensive security features suitable for enterprise-level needs.
Cloudflare One is praised for ease of use and cost efficiency, making it ideal for smaller teams. In comparison, AWS Shield's advanced DDoS protection and integration with AWS are appealing to enterprises with complex security needs and substantial budgets.
Cloudflare One offers a cost-effective setup with user-friendly options, while AWS Shield requires a higher initial investment but provides robust protection capabilities.
Cloudflare One offers a cost-effective setup with user-friendly options, while AWS Shield requires a higher initial investment but provides robust protection capabilities.
Arbor DDoS suits organizations seeking granular on-premises control with strong customer support. In comparison, AWS Shield appeals to businesses favoring seamless AWS integration and cloud-native features. Each solution targets different operational needs, influencing a tech buyer's decision-making process.
Imperva DDoS appeals to buyers with competitive pricing and strong customer support, offering seamless deployment and cost-effective protection. In comparison, AWS Shield attracts those within the AWS ecosystem, emphasizing strong integration and advanced threat filtering despite higher costs.
Imperva DDoS offers competitive setup costs with flexible pricing, while AWS Shield's setup may involve higher initial investments. Imperva DDoS provides a straightforward start compared to the potentially more complex onboarding of AWS Shield.
Imperva DDoS offers competitive setup costs with flexible pricing, while AWS Shield's setup may involve higher initial investments. Imperva DDoS provides a straightforward start compared to the potentially more complex onboarding of AWS Shield.
AWS Shield provides economical, seamless DDoS protection within AWS services. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector enhances security with comprehensive threat detection and API protection for diverse applications, making it ideal for buyers seeking advanced security despite potentially higher costs.
AWS Shield has a higher setup cost compared to Akamai App and API Protector which offers a more budget-friendly option. AWS Shield targets larger enterprises, while Akamai is ideal for businesses looking for cost-effective security.
AWS Shield has a higher setup cost compared to Akamai App and API Protector which offers a more budget-friendly option. AWS Shield targets larger enterprises, while Akamai is ideal for businesses looking for cost-effective security.
AWS Shield offers seamless integration with AWS infrastructure, appealing to companies seeking cost-effective protection with automatic mitigation and real-time support. In comparison, Radware provides comprehensive threat management with proactive detection, making it attractive for enterprises desiring extensive security and dedicated customer service.
Prolexic offers advanced threat intelligence and is valued for support and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, AWS Shield provides seamless AWS integration, enhancing its appeal for AWS environments. Prolexic suits cost-sensitive scenarios, while AWS Shield's advanced features justify its investment for comprehensive AWS solutions.
Fortinet FortiDDoS offers advanced threat detection and granular control, ideal for on-premises deployment with proactive support. In comparison, AWS Shield provides seamless AWS integration and flexible cloud protection with a pay-as-you-go model suitable for cloud-native operations seeking cost efficiency.
Fortinet FortiDDoS has a higher setup cost while AWS Shield is more budget-friendly for setup expenses; these cost differences highlight Fortinet's enterprise focus compared to AWS Shield's more accessible pricing for businesses of various sizes.
Fortinet FortiDDoS has a higher setup cost while AWS Shield is more budget-friendly for setup expenses; these cost differences highlight Fortinet's enterprise focus compared to AWS Shield's more accessible pricing for businesses of various sizes.
A10 Thunder TPS effectively prevents DDoS attacks with advanced threat intelligence, making it suitable for users seeking tailored security. In comparison, AWS Shield offers seamless integration within AWS services, ideal for those prioritizing scalability and ease of deployment.
The setup cost for F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) tends to be higher due to its robust features, whereas AWS Shield offers a more cost-effective setup, differing in initial investment requirements.
The setup cost for F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) tends to be higher due to its robust features, whereas AWS Shield offers a more cost-effective setup, differing in initial investment requirements.
