Bitbucket Reviews

We use BitBucket as a repository for backing up our VS code. 

BitBucket is a reliable and user-friendly product. 

The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions.  

I have used BitBucket for five months.

BitBucket is stable. We haven't had issues. 

I rate BitBucket eight out of 10 for scalability. 

I rate BitBucket support eight out of 10.

Positive

Deploying BitBucket is straightforward. 

I rate BitBucket eight out of 10. It's accessible to beginners. They can start by layering BitBucket and move on to other tools.

We predominately use Bitbucket for continuous integration, as a repository for our code, and for various departments, such as analytics, web, and mobile.

Bitbucket could improve pipeline building and deployment. Our deployments are not using the Bitbucket. Deployments we are going through Azure DevOps, but the integration is happening in Bitbucket.

The repository and the access levels could improve.

I have used Bitbucket for approximately four years.

We have not had any issues with day-to-day usage of Bitbucket since we started using it.

We have not scaled Bitbucket that much to know the full range, but for what we use it for it has been good.

We have 10 to 20 users using this solution in our organization.

I have not needed to use the support team from Bitbucket.

The setup of Bitbucket is simple.

We have approximately 40 licenses for Bitbucket.

We did a benchmark before we chose our continuous integration environment. We found Bitbucket is the right tool for us at the start-up level. We conducted tests for Git, GitLab, and other solutions, but the decision we made was Bitbucket.

I rate Bitbucket an eight out of ten.

We use Bitbucket in our company for source code management.

The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its issue management.

Bitbucket should consider having a CI/CD if they don’t have it already. Bitbucket’s stability could be improved.

I have been using Bitbucket for ten years.

I rate Bitbucket a nine out of ten for stability.

Twelve developers are using Bitbucket in our organization.

Since it is on the cloud, Bitbucket’s initial setup is straightforward.

We have seen a return on investment with Bitbucket.

I use the latest version of Bitbucket. I would recommend users to use Bitbucket if they have the budget.

Overall, I rate Bitbucket a nine out of ten.

Our primary use case is for an ICM tool. Just source code. 

Bitbucket is significantly cheaper compared to GitHub and it provides on-premises hosting.

I would like to see the development operations side improved. The main challenge that we faced is implementing anything on the cloud. We need an improved automation feature for the cloud.

I have worked with Bitbucket now for four or five years.

The stability is very good. Even with the on-premises solution, we did not face any issues so far. I can only remember one or two times we may have had an issue.

Bitbucket is easy to scale and given that the cost, now I think even GitHub is charging based on the users for a team, but BitBucket is on-premises, and it has limitless scalability. We have six hundred users currently involved in working with coding.

I would rate Bitbucket a nine out of ten.

Bitbucket is supporting port management and when we're using Asana we can sync our old tickets with Bitbucket which has helped out our organization.

The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its capabilities.

I have been using Bitbucket for five years.

Bitbucket is stable.

The stability of Bitbucket is good.

I plan to use the solution in the future.

I rate the support from Bitbucket a four out of five.

Positive

I have used GitHub and GitLab.

The initial setup of Bitbucket is quick.

I have seen a return on investment from using Bitbucket.

I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five.

Bitbucket is similar to GitHub and GitLab.

One person can maintain the solution.

This is a good solution that has many features.

I rate Bitbucket a nine out of ten.

We are using Bitbucket for the code checking and tracking of our project depositories which we have locally. This includes code changes in software development. 

Bitbucket has helped our company stay current with our updated code daily.

The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it is has been a good experience from my side using this solution.

One of the areas the solution could improve on is when there is a merging conflict it is quite confusing. When I am having a merging conflict I get stuck on the page, then I need to search how to handle the particular problem. For example, finding what the commands are which can be used. 

I might not have the proper knowledge of it. However, the merging processes can be difficult and could be made easier. Overall there should be better documentation available. When I first started out it would have been very helpful because I had to search to find out how to use the solution.

In an upcoming release, the solution could improve the collaboration. Additionally, there should be some startup tool or features for whenever we have local changes or updates it will prevent us from submitting any change unless they have been removed locally. For example, 
there should be some sort of command tool that can remove my local code first and then checking it by taking code from the latest one to resolve it.

I have been using Bitbucket within the last 12 months.

The stability of the solution is good. However, there have been times I had to close the program down and restart it.

The solution is scalable and it is not very difficult to do.

We have approximately 10 people using this solution in my organization which includes various teams, such as the automation department.

We use this solution every day and frequently, we plan to continue using it in the future.

I have used a previous version that was not user-friendly. Additionally, I have used GitHub.

We have one technician that does the maintenance of the solution.

I rate Bitbucket a seven out of ten.

Our primary use case of this solution is as source repository. We use it to store all the source codes. So we basically use it for easy management of access to the source repository and creating pull requests. It also helps us to manage and get an overview of the different branches we have. It integrates into JIRA seamlessly so you can see the task effects on a JIRA task and Git.

What I liked the most about this program is that it integrates seamlessly with JIRA, which really adds value to our organization. I also like it as a pull request feature, even though that feature can definitely be improved.

I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support. It already works quite well, but there are still some issues with the support of the workflow and how to actually measure the time you spend on using reviews for pull requests compared to the time you actually use for doing the task. I am not really sure how that should be handled. I don't have a good solution for it yet. 

I don't have any issues with the stability of Bitbucket. It just works as it should.

The only thing I've experienced with the scalability is that you have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users. That's more related to the cost model. I don't think I've experienced any scalability issues with it so far, however. I didn't expect to either because it's primarily hooked up to Git, that's the source repository.

Only when we misuse Git, like when we add large binary files to a source repository, it doesn't go that well. That's because we don't use it like it was intended to be used. It has nothing to do with Bitbucket - it's more about Git.

I haven't used their technical support yet.

I don't know exactly what the program costs, but it depends on how many users you have. We recently upgraded from 50 to 100 users, and I think it's public on the website. I am not sure. 

My advice to others would be that, if they are looking for a stable on-premises solution, Bitbucket is the obvious choice. They can even use it if they are looking for a cloud solution, but we have a restriction that we have to run it on-premises. Therefore I think it's the smallest, best solution for us. 

I think it's worth paying for the extra features because otherwise you end up spending a lot of time configuring open source products. 

On a scale from one to 10, I rate Bitbucket a nine.

Bitbucket, like GitHub, serves as a repository for coding and facilitates integration management and version control. It has features related to these aspects.

One of Bitbucket's notable features is its ability to integrate with other addressing solutions.

I believe continuous improvement is always a good goal to strive for. 

In future releases, more integration is always a valuable aspect to consider.

I used Bitbucket for about three months. 

It seems to be quite scalable.

I was familiar with GitHub as another option.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

I would definitely recommend using the solution because one of the great features of Bitbucket is its compatibility with other solutions like Atlassian and others. I highly recommend it.