Bitbucket Reviews

Our primary use case of this solution is as source repository. We use it to store all the source codes. So we basically use it for easy management of access to the source repository and creating pull requests. It also helps us to manage and get an overview of the different branches we have. It integrates into JIRA seamlessly so you can see the task effects on a JIRA task and Git.

What I liked the most about this program is that it integrates seamlessly with JIRA, which really adds value to our organization. I also like it as a pull request feature, even though that feature can definitely be improved.

I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support. It already works quite well, but there are still some issues with the support of the workflow and how to actually measure the time you spend on using reviews for pull requests compared to the time you actually use for doing the task. I am not really sure how that should be handled. I don't have a good solution for it yet. 

I don't have any issues with the stability of Bitbucket. It just works as it should.

The only thing I've experienced with the scalability is that you have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users. That's more related to the cost model. I don't think I've experienced any scalability issues with it so far, however. I didn't expect to either because it's primarily hooked up to Git, that's the source repository.

Only when we misuse Git, like when we add large binary files to a source repository, it doesn't go that well. That's because we don't use it like it was intended to be used. It has nothing to do with Bitbucket - it's more about Git.

I haven't used their technical support yet.

I don't know exactly what the program costs, but it depends on how many users you have. We recently upgraded from 50 to 100 users, and I think it's public on the website. I am not sure. 

My advice to others would be that, if they are looking for a stable on-premises solution, Bitbucket is the obvious choice. They can even use it if they are looking for a cloud solution, but we have a restriction that we have to run it on-premises. Therefore I think it's the smallest, best solution for us. 

I think it's worth paying for the extra features because otherwise you end up spending a lot of time configuring open source products. 

On a scale from one to 10, I rate Bitbucket a nine.

Bitbucket, like GitHub, serves as a repository for coding and facilitates integration management and version control. It has features related to these aspects.

One of Bitbucket's notable features is its ability to integrate with other addressing solutions.

I believe continuous improvement is always a good goal to strive for. 

In future releases, more integration is always a valuable aspect to consider.

I used Bitbucket for about three months. 

It seems to be quite scalable.

I was familiar with GitHub as another option.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

I would definitely recommend using the solution because one of the great features of Bitbucket is its compatibility with other solutions like Atlassian and others. I highly recommend it.

We develop our own applications and all of our source code activities are managed and tracked on Bitbucket.

Bitbucket is a standard git implementation with perfectly coordinated screens, it's secure, and we have had no problems with it.

We are satisfied with the user interface.

The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved. The same is true for the upgrade process. I have upgraded it twice, and it is similar to the initial installation.

I have been using Bitbucket for two years.

We have had no problems and I'm satisfied with the stability. We use it quite heavily because all of our applications and updates are handled on different branches in Bitbucket.

I cannot say much with respect to scalability because we are a small company with a maximum of five people who are using the product.

In the two years that we have been using Bitbucket, we have not needed any support.

Prior to using Bitbucket, we were using the freeware version of SVN. We switched because Bitbucket has better features, especially for source code maintenance.

The initial setup was a little bit complex. It requires more intervention on the Linux console than the other Atlassian products. You need to adjust more files, for example.

It took us about a month to deploy and three people were involved in the process. Only one person is required for maintenance because it is generally maintained by Atlassian.

The deployment was done by our in-house team.

We have seen ROI but I cannot easily quantify it with numbers.

We are using the minimum package with ten users and we are happy with the price because we are a small company. With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month. There are no fees in addition to this.

We evaluated GitHub but we require our own server for source code management.

This solution is good and it covers all our needs. Periodically, I receive announcements from Atlassian, mostly concerning the security features. They are fixing the newly discovered vulnerabilities and also, there are some other improvements in the features. Normally, I am not affected by the new features because we don't require them.

My advice is to start using this solution because it works very well and we are very satisfied with the functionality. If somebody knows how to configure git for libraries then they can implement Bitbucket as well.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for managing our own repository.

I don't have too much experience with Bitbucket; I use GitHub more often.

It's easy to switch back and forth between Bitbucket and GitHub.

The code review and creation of requests need improvement. In GitHub it's much easier and broader and that makes everything easier to see.

The solution is not user-friendly. Right now, the solution is not so easy to understand. It needs to update its design and overall user experience.

I've been using the solution for several months.

The solution is relatively stable. It's much more stable than GitHub.

The solution is fairly scalable. I'm not sure if scaling affects pricing, however. We often have around 100 users on the solution, but it depends on the project.

I've never had to contact technical support.

We did previously use a different solution. We switched to Bitbucket when we switched projects.

The initial deployment is rather straightforward and only takes 30 minutes to an hour.

I handled the implementation myself.

We use the cloud deployment model.

We use the solution pretty extensively, but it depends on the client and the project.

I'd suggest those considering implementing the solution try all the functionalities in the trial period. That way you can decide if it will work for your projects.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We're using Bitbucket for version control and deployment.

What I like best about Bitbucket is that you can use it for deployment, primarily if your IP addresses do not work well with your deployment scripts. You can use the tool to whitelist IP addresses during deployment.

Currently, what's lacking in Bitbucket is the assignment feature or the feature of giving permissions to other users.

I've been working with Bitbucket since 2014.

The scalability of Bitbucket is ten out of ten. Bitbucket has documentation on how to scale, and you can also communicate with the Bitbucket team for any scalability-related questions.

I have yet to contact the technical support team for Bitbucket.

Currently, we are moving from Bitbucket to GitLab for convenience, but at the moment, we're still using both solutions.

Setting up Bitbucket is simple because you can log in with your email account.

My team uses scripts developed on Ruby to do Bitbucket deployments.

Bitbucket is a low-priced tool.

My company evaluated GitLab.

I'm working as a software engineer.

My company has four Bitbucket users.

My rating for Bitbucket is nine out of ten.

I recommend the tool to others. One company even consulted with me, and I told that company to focus on Bitbucket.

My company is a Bitbucket user. There's no partnership currently.

Our primary use case is for source coding and continuous integration.

Bitbucket has helped improve our organization by speeding up our production efficiency and product delivery processes.

Bitbucket is an integral part of our CI/CD project.

I would like to see the integration with some of the cloud service providers improved.

I have been using Bitbucket for the past year.

Bitbucket does not have a problem with stability.

The scalability of Bitbucket is reliable and we have over two thousand five hundred product items in place and the solution is operating as expected.

Technical support is good. We are facing accessibility maybe once a month. This is a small number in comparison with others in the field.

The initial setup of Bitbucket is not complex but you need to have a good working knowledge of the infrastructure.

The implementation can be done in-house and takes two to three hours.

When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan.

I can definitely recommend using Bitbucket and would rate them a nine out of ten.

Our company uses the solution for code management. 

It is easy to write code and store it in the central repository. 

Fine tuning for procedures and features related to analytics and code validation is needed. 

There are some issues in obtaining licenses.

I have been using the solution for two years. 

The solution is stable so I rate it a nine out of ten. 

The dynamic solution is definitely scalable and customizable to any need. 

Technical support is pretty helpful so I rate them an eight out of ten. 

Positive

The setup is simple with no issues. 

We implemented the solution in-house. 

Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved.

I rate pricing a six out of ten. 

We did not evaluate other options. 

I rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

Bitbucket has a global way of collecting data from air conditioners and real-time data collection for global customers.

We like that it can be integrated with Jira.

We should be able to choose the size of the RAM or container classification. We would like to see more infrastructure for the code. The scalability could be improved.

We have been using Bitbucket for nine months.

I rate the stability a five out of ten. In our organization, we have a lot of microservices, so our project wasn't that stable.

I rate the scalability a four out of ten, and it could be improved. We have about 20 users.

The setup was okay, and it was well-integrated. We are using a subscription cloud.

GitLab UI is better than Bitbucket. The UI in Bitbucket could be better. Jira is also not easy to understand.

I rate this solution a seven out of ten. We want people to use Jira for an integrated approach between Jira and all the products. Regarding advice, If you want an enterprise-class product, I first recommend Jira, and then I would recommend Bitbucket.