Cisco Duo Reviews

I work in a FinTech-based organization that primarily deals with card payments and payment orchestration solutions. As a FinTech company, we are required to maintain a high level of security for secure data and transactions occurring through our systems and servers. For our authentication process, we were using OpenLDAP and were searching for a solution that could be implemented with OpenLDAP to create a robust multi-factor authentication system within our infrastructure. This allows us to authenticate securely, ensuring that only authorized personnel can access the infrastructure and servers based on their identity.

We use this authentication mechanism exclusively for internal purposes and do not expose it to the public. Cisco Duo is deployed on my cloud servers.

The multi-factor authentication features of Cisco Duo have been particularly valuable to us. One key feature is Duo Unix, which can be implemented directly on Linux servers for SSH access. Additionally, we use Duo Authentication Proxy, which can be separately integrated with other tools such as OpenLDAP for server authentication. We also integrate Cisco Duo with various tools that have dashboards, such as Grafana, to enable secure login capabilities. We primarily use Duo Unix and Duo Authentication Proxy.

After searching through many tools, we found that Cisco Duo can work without requiring PAM modules and can integrate with the other services and tools we were already using. I believe we are fully reliant on Cisco Duo; it is completely reliable with our system, and we use it primarily for the authentication process. Without Cisco Duo, we cannot operate effectively. Cisco Duo is so integral to our core operations that we cannot perform any task without it.

I cannot speak extensively on this point because we are not using Cisco Duo to its full extent, as we are still in the initial phases and exploring its capabilities. So far, I have not found anything that requires improvement. I am satisfied with all the services I am currently using.

I have been using Cisco Duo for approximately one and a half years.

The only issue I encountered was related to the expiration of Duo Unix versions below 2.0.3 on February 3rd. Before the expiry date, the Duo Unix module began behaving inconsistently. Sometimes it did not prompt for authentication, allowing us to log into the server without verification. On other occasions, it responded appropriately, but there were instances when it started malfunctioning. Even though version 2.0.3 was in use during that time, it should have worked without errors. After upgrading to a version prior to that specific version, everything has functioned properly.

I have not tested Cisco Duo's scalability or examined anything related to it. However, I would like to rate it based on its flexibility, which I would rate between eight and nine out of ten.

I have not experienced any difficulty connecting with customer support or any other support specialist. The documentation provided proved to be sufficient. By reviewing the documentation and blogs available, one can easily find solutions and processes for integration and usage. The documents are comprehensive and thorough.

As I mentioned earlier, we were using another multi-factor authentication tool, but it was not compatible with our Active Directory solution. We were searching for a solution that would be compatible with our Active Directory and the other services we were using, which included dashboards and portals for logging into systems. After evaluating many tools, we discovered Cisco Duo MFA.

Initially, I was uncertain about how to implement Cisco Duo MFA. However, through the blogs available on Cisco Duo's page and the manuals and documentation provided, I gradually learned how to implement it and integrate it with our system and other tools. The documentation and blogs were nearly complete and provided me with sufficient knowledge on the implementation process.

I was the one who started implementing Cisco Duo.

I have not implemented Cisco Duo's end-to-end phishing resistance with capabilities such as proximity verification at this time.

I cannot speak to the financial planning of the organization, but I can confirm that Cisco Duo falls within the security budget that has been allocated to us.

After searching through many tools, we selected Cisco Duo because it can function without PAM modules and can integrate with the other services and tools we were already using.

We have not experienced any issues regarding phishing attacks.

I have not deployed Duo Directory, but I have created many users in the user section of the Cisco Duo admin portal. We manage user authentication, their devices, and everything else directly from the portal.

Regarding the use of Cisco Duo for our requirements, I would rate it a nine. Overall, I would rate this product an eight.

Cisco Duo is a cloud-based multi-factor authentication and zero-trust security platform used primarily to verify that users logging in are who they claim to be and that their devices are trusted before access is granted.

Cisco Duo's secure access for VPNs and remote users stands out as a valuable feature, as it integrates with Cisco AnyConnect and third-party firewalls and VPN solutions such as Palo Alto, FortiGate, and SonicWall, which is valuable for hybrid and remote work environments.

I use the unified identity intelligence in Cisco Duo to facilitate understanding user behavior, and this understanding helps my organization by providing a consistent and centralized identity for a user across all systems, applications, and other access methods, allowing a single identity for all systems and applications.

I use the end-to-end phishing resistance feature in Cisco Duo, which helps my security posture by securing the entire authentication journey, meaning that phishing attacks fail even if a user is tricked into entering credentials up to the final access.

Areas that have room for improvement in Cisco Duo include pricing, as Cisco is quite expensive, and the fact that Cisco Duo relies heavily on external identity providers such as Active Directory or Entra ID and does not offer full identity lifecycle management on its own, which leads organizations to often pair Cisco Duo with another IAM solution for complete identity governance.

I have been using Cisco Duo for approximately five years.

Cisco Duo's stability is quite good, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.

Cisco Duo is quite scalable, and I would rate it a seven out of ten.

I would rate Cisco support as very good, an eight out of ten, where ten is the best.

Positive

Although my company uses only Cisco Duo, I have considered other solutions such as Microsoft Entra ID, which integrates identity provider, MFA, SSO, and conditional access for Microsoft ecosystems, with deep conditional access and risk policies tied to Azure services and Microsoft 365. When comparing Cisco Duo with Okta, Okta includes Universal Directory, advanced SSO, lifecycle automation, and API access management, along with a massive integration ecosystem with thousands of pre-built app integrations, making it ideal for large and diverse enterprises.

The return on investment I have seen with Cisco Duo is quite good. Although it is expensive, once established, it proves to be very efficient and helps with authentication significantly, leading me to estimate approximately a fifty percent return on investment.

The increase in phishing attacks is noticeable, as they appear to increase daily. My advice for others looking to implement Cisco Duo is that if they already have an existing solution and want to add something, Cisco Duo would be perfect. If they want to start from scratch, they can consider Okta, and if they have a Microsoft and Azure environment, they can opt for Microsoft. However, if they predominantly work within a Cisco environment, then Cisco Duo would be the best choice. I believe Cisco Duo is worth the investment, offering a good return on investment, as it is expensive but works very well without any downtime or high maintenance, and the support is also good. Approximately 2,300 users in my company use Cisco Duo. Cisco Duo is not entirely local or global, but rather is located in one place. Cisco Duo does not necessarily require any maintenance. Cisco Duo was purchased through the Marketplace rather than directly. I gave this review an overall rating of seven out of ten.

My main use cases with Cisco Duo involve managing access. I've integrated it into my platform so that customers can connect using Cisco Duo. It manages all the users connecting on my platform and provides SAML integration so they can use their Cisco Duo account credentials to connect.

The feature I appreciate most about Cisco Duo is the ease of integration with my platform. It's straightforward with all the APIs they have to integrate with my platform. After that, I just put a Cisco Duo button on my login page, and then people can use their credentials. The integration is what I value the most.

Cisco Duo benefits my organization by making it easy for me to reach out to customers using Cisco Duo so they can integrate on my platform using their credentials. They don't have to change the way they connect, and it makes the whole experience seamless. That's why it's truly beneficial for my organization.

In Cisco Duo, what could be improved is having more features. We are using a front-end broker because the integration was something we struggled with. I would suggest releasing some API endpoints so we can have additional integration options beyond the basic one we used to have.

I have been using Cisco Duo for four years.

I assess the stability and reliability of Cisco Duo as having some slowness at certain points, but it's not really an issue. Overall, the performance is good.

I didn't have to use customer service regarding Cisco Duo.

Negative

The experience of deploying Cisco Duo was straightforward and easy.

I can say that I've seen a return on investment from having Cisco Duo.

Cisco Duo has provided a return on investment by integrating and increasing my reach to people and customers using Cisco Duo. It has had an impact on my revenue because I was able to integrate more customers. There is a clear ROI to this.

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cisco Duo is that I've been working with Cisco for a long time, so it's straightforward. Pricing is per user, so it's easy to understand.

Before adopting Cisco Duo, I considered other solutions. I've worked extensively with Azure AD and Okta. However, because Cisco Duo is a Cisco product, it makes sense for me to integrate with it.

I am not using Identity Intelligence in Cisco Duo.

I haven't noticed an increase in phishing attacks in my organization recently.

I haven't implemented Cisco Duo end-to-end phishing resistance with proximity verification, though I may consider it if needed. I wasn't aware of the feature until now.

I have deployed Cisco Duo Directory to manage user identity.

I use a front-end broker with Cisco Duo that manages all the IDPs for my platform. It integrates with Cisco Duo and different SAML providers.

I would not say that Cisco Duo helped reduce the overall authentication-related costs, but it definitely helped specifically for managing those customers.

I did not discover any feature in Cisco Duo that I didn't think I would use initially and later discovered along the way. I believe we are knowledgeable about all these SAML providers, so we knew what we wanted to leverage.

I would rate this review as an eight out of ten.

My main use cases for Cisco Duo involve working for a public school district, specifically in my administration building, where I manage the C-suite users, finance, HR, and my front office secretaries at my sites.

Using Cisco Duo benefits my organization by making it harder for potential threats to access our systems, especially since we work in public education and are a huge target right now.

What I most appreciate about Cisco Duo is the ease of use.

The strong security authentication system has been easy while logging in. I just use the app. 

The benefit of having a complete passwordless environment in our organization is that it's gotten people away from using the sticky note under their keyboard - which is a huge problem. It's also helped stop the sharing of passwords. You'll have somebody that's out one day and somebody will just sit down at their computer and use that person's password. We can now stop a lot of that stuff.

There is always room for improvement.

I have been using Cisco Duo for about two years.

I have experienced no issues regarding the stability and reliability of Cisco Duo.

I have not scaled Cisco Duo yet. That said, my understanding is it will not be an issue when the time comes.

I would assess the customer service and technical support of Cisco Duo as a seven out of ten, as I do not use it frequently. I did find a recent communication webcast engaging.

Neutral

I did not consider any other solutions before selecting Cisco Duo, as I inherited it when I got hired after someone else had begun the implementation phase.

It took me a while to figure it out. I went to every user snad forced them to set it up. I might have done it the long way. 

I use Cisco Duo at a very basic level for the most part and I wear many hats. Cybersecurity is one of them, and I have pretty much rolled out Duo by myself as the only one managing it.

I have not seen any ROI with Cisco Duo that is immediately apparent. I assume in the back end, it has saved me from other issues that could have happened. I feel much safer having it in place. It's providing peace of mind.

The pricing, setup costs, and licensing are all good. I haven't had any issues.

I had no issues with pricing, setup costs, and licensing since I went through a VAR, got a quote for 600 licenses, which is what we currently use, and I annually renew it.

I did not purchase the solution on AWS Marketplace. 

My advice to other organizations considering Cisco Duo is to implement this solution. 

I would rate Cisco Duo overall at probably an eight out of ten.

We use Cisco Duo for MFA on all of our devices. We're exploring single sign-on right now, but haven't implemented that yet.

Cisco Duo has made us more secure. We've managed to stop some threats with it and keep our users and devices safe.

The benefits of a passwordless environment are pretty high. The biggest challenge that made us want to implement it was just the number of password resets that we have had to do. We had to send people to third-party vendors, and there were a lot of complaints. Being able to handle one password or one section makes our life a lot easier as IT, and their life a lot easier knowing exactly who to go to.

The UI of Cisco Duo is easy to use, especially the web backend, and it's really intuitive and easy to set up. The experience with Duo's strong security authentication system has been easy when logging in.

Cisco Duo can be improved with better ways to set users up. Currently, we might not be doing it perfectly as we're having them email in phone numbers to get them set up with Duo Mobile. I wish there was more of a self-service option than there is currently, at least to my understanding of Duo.

I've been using Cisco Duo for five years.

It's pretty good. There was one outage, and they emailed us right away, so we were informed.

Cisco Duo scales really well with the growing needs of our organization. Other than the licensing thing I talked about, we're able to add as many as we want, and we're at a little over a thousand with no issues.

We started with just our public safety departments, such as police and fire, but then we moved to the entire city staff. It went very well.

I haven't used them much, but the one time I did, it was pretty seamless. They got back to us quickly, were nice, and gave us what we needed.

Positive

Prior to adopting Cisco Duo, I wasn't using another solution.

Deploying Cisco Duo has been easy. The biggest challenge is getting all the end users on board, but in terms of software deployment, it's pretty painless.

We've seen ROI with Cisco Duo as it has brought our insurance premium down.

It's a bit confusing because we're on a three-year plan with a certain number of licenses, and we've gone over that number. They told us that when we renew, they will add all these licenses. We've expanded quickly, so everyone's kind of scared because no one knows what the bill is with the long pricing cycle. We know what it's going to be-ish, but until we get the bill, it's kind of rough.

We considered Okta and Entra ID from Microsoft before selecting Cisco Duo. Cisco Duo looks modern, which I know is a weird one, but we have to think about the end user and what they see. There is also the ease of use. It seemed to fit seamlessly and had the most features. We already use other Cisco products. So using another Cisco product seemed like a no-brainer for us.

Single sign-on would make things easier. We have a lot of different departments. They all have different needs. They use a lot of different programs. Single sign-on will be helpful for us.

Cisco Identity Intelligence’s capability to detect and respond to identity-based risks effectively is very good. We're exploring using that a little bit more. It's always great to be able to look through and see if people's devices are out of date and things like that, for addressing security concerns.

My advice to other organizations considering Cisco Duo is to do it. It's easy and was the option that fitted our needs the best. It was also painless. What more can we ask for? 

I would rate Cisco Duo a nine out of ten.

The main purpose involves addressing questions about SLA tickets. I add persons to security groups and grant access for VPN connections and authentications to add them to the portal, synchronizing them with the Microsoft Azure AD platform and logging cell phone numbers and phone numbers. I also provide access for SSO or mobile tokens, whether hardware or software, and access for Cisco Duo software on cell phones.

I use the web portal for Cisco Duo and the software on my site for self sign-in to the portal. I primarily use the platform for authentications, adding users to groups, and other management tasks. I can block someone or remove them from security groups when an employee leaves the firm or when other security issues occur.

I particularly check where someone is logging in and from which country. I verify if they are under contract to stay in a safe place, such as Germany or Frankfurt. If a person logs in from another country or place, I investigate. From a security perspective, I work with other platforms and coordinate with employees in different departments. I do not focus on security steps themselves. I sometimes examine sign-ins, checking time differences, locations, and IPs in short timeframes. This does relate to security, but I use this method only when questions arise.

The general usability and visual interface are valuable to me. It is not significantly different from other tools, but it is usable. It is suitable for a technical person who has an understanding of these tools or software and finds it usable and understandable.

It provides the possibility to get employees directly started with their jobs or schooling for new projects. For this, what is important is the time between registration and account access and whether there is a general problem or minor questions about the main reason. However, there are no strong problems.

An AI tool or AI capability would be better. An AI support robot or bot that provides direct answers to questions without requiring the search for facts or documents to find solutions would be an improvement.

I have been using this solution for two years full-time, working for a global company across all regions.

Although I have not received direct technical support for Cisco Duo, I would rate it eight or nine. Working with this web portal and technical software capability, I have never experienced significant connection loss or other major issues.

My company operates globally with approximately 450,000 employees. Within the projects I manage, there are 10,000 employees, and in another MET region, there are over 15,000. We are a partner with most brands that are usable globally and provide them access to the projects.

Although I have not received direct technical support for Cisco Duo, I would rate it eight or nine. Working with this web portal and technical software capability, I have never experienced significant connection loss or other major issues.

Positive

Cisco Duo is my first app or web-based platform. I have never had experience with another brand and cannot compare Cisco Duo to other brands or firms that provide VPN connections or secure connections.

It is easy.

We have access to our portal where I work. They provide access with limited admin rights. We use only the Concentrix portal, which is the company portal.

I have no idea about the pricing. Another department handles this. I am only able to use it for accessing and other functions, but I cannot say this is a different or difficult platform for someone to use because the documents are available. When someone has a problem, they can search the documents and find solutions for simple steps.

I can recommend Cisco Duo because it is very easy to accept and understand. In the two to two and a half years I have used it, I have never experienced a problem. We do not lose connection or encounter other issues, which is the main reason I can offer this recommendation. I would rate this solution nine out of ten.

Our main use case of Cisco Duo in my company is for two-factor authentication.

What I appreciate most about Cisco Duo is the fact that I can input the code instead of acknowledging it through the app. If I'm overseas, I can simply input the code. This benefits my company by meeting and satisfying the security requirements imposed on the network by the security team.

My impression of Cisco's identity intelligence capability to detect and respond to identity-based risks effectively is that it's a great product. 

The phone is the preferred location for Cisco Duo installation, not a separate key fob, as SecureID used to do. That is the preferred method, so I don't see any other options. I have never gone into Cisco Insider.

I only use Cisco Duo on my phone, so I am unsure about potential improvements. I don't think it can be installed anywhere else. I'm unsure how to disable the ping notification sound on my phone when using Cisco Duo. I don't know how to silence it. That's the most annoying part when I'm trying to be quiet. The ability to tweak it as an administrator could make it a ten. Note that every product needs some kind of improvement.

I have been using Cisco Duo personally for four years. In my company, we have been using Cisco Duo for two years.

Cisco Duo is rock solid in terms of stability and reliability.

We are fairly large and there's no issue with how Cisco Duo scales with the growing needs of my company. Plus, we're traveling all over the globe, it works globally.

I have not had any personal experience with Cisco Duo's customer service and technical support. We've had very few complaints.

I have only experienced SecureID when considering other solutions before choosing Cisco Duo. It was kind of clunky when I used it. Cisco Duo is not more clunky than SecureID.

My experience with the deployment of Cisco Duo is that it's pretty easy compared to SecureID, and that's the only thing I can compare with, though that was a long time ago.

For us, the biggest return on investment when using Cisco Duo is the ease of deployment and its rock-solid performance. If it's rock solid, we can't complain.

I have nothing to compare against the pricing, the setup cost, and the licensing of Cisco Duo, but it satisfied the management. For Cisco shops, that's sufficient.

The only other solution I can compare to is SecureID, which is cumbersome.

There are not any new features or functionalities in Cisco Duo that my company has started using recently; it's just straightforward two-factor authentication.

I have not used Cisco Duo's conversational AI interface.

Regarding the feature called Advanced Identity Threat Detection and Response in Cisco Duo, I've heard of the term, and I've seen the feature mentioned. I'm not quite sure what it is. I've noticed recently that it's asking me to input a PIN.

I do not yet have a complete passwordless environment in my company as we still have two-factor, with the first level of authentication being Active Directory authentication, which involves a password. This solution adds to that.

From one to ten, I would rate Cisco Duo overall a nine.

I mainly use Cisco Duo for 2FA and sell that to our customers and the engineering team.

I would like to sell Cisco Duo's end-to-end phishing resistance more to customers.

We are talking with a customer to sell them Cisco Duo Directory to manage user identities.

I appreciate the secured push feature of Cisco Duo because you have to choose a number.

I value this feature because it is a security feature that enhances the security of your users, and if you also have geolocation for verified push, that would be even better.

It benefits our company as well as our customers because it is more secure. You can have geolocation or know which network the users are on, so if they do not have a push when they are in the company, but if they are on holidays or traveling somewhere, they have a push verified login, which is much more secure.

It is difficult to say how Cisco Duo can be improved. I think it is a good product, but we do not have many customers that use it, so perhaps in marketing, we should bring it more to our customers and show them the use cases for Cisco Duo.

I have been using Cisco Duo for one and a half years.

The experience my clients have with Cisco Duo is mainly good. There are sometimes some problems, but not major ones, so it is a solid security product.

My clients have never had major problems with Cisco Duo. Everything works fine most of the time, and maybe sometimes there are minor problems, but these are more configuration problems than problems with the product itself.

Cisco Duo is really good for scalability. As with almost every cloud product, the scalability is really good, so it does not matter how many users you have.

I have never had experience with customer service and technical support.

Negative

The setup process for Cisco Duo is quite easy and can be done really quickly. You can have test users, and I think the rollout process is great. They really think about how you deploy it, and it is fair and easily done.

The return on investment, like every security product, has to be done. It is much more costly if you do not deploy security in your company.

I think the prices of Cisco Duo are quite fair, but the main problem is that Microsoft Authenticator is built-in with M365, so everyone is switching to that and using it instead of Cisco Duo because it costs extra as a standalone product.

I would give Cisco Duo a rating of 9 out of 10. I do not give it a 10 because I think it is a great product that is easily set up and enhances security. My advice for other companies considering Cisco Duo is to reach out to Netcloud to help. I do not have anything else to add about my experience with Cisco Duo.