We use Duo, Client, and Umbrella.
Our primary use case for this is for our clients to be secure.
We use Duo, Client, and Umbrella.
Our primary use case for this is for our clients to be secure.
We are at the beginning of using Umbrella. We use a traditional Cisco proxy. Now, with Umbrella, it's easy to administrate. It helps save us time.
Everything is all in one dashboard, so it makes the administration very easy.
Cisco Secure solutions are great for detecting and remediating threats across our infrastructure from end to end. The integration of Talos in SecureX is great. Everything is clear in one dashboard. You have your dashboard and can have one look in your dashboard and see everything. It's on one pane of glass.
Smart Licensing needs improvement. It's terrible. We have problems with it every year and we need to involve support to fix it.
Our appliances are connected to Cisco Smart Center but they don't get the license. That's our pain point. But then when they work, they work.
I liked the traditional licensing. We get the license key, pass it, and it works.
We have been using Umbrella for one month and we just started using Duo. We have been using classic Cisco for seven years.
The support is fast and good.
The first level of support asks a lot of questions. We have a partner who does it for us. If we have a problem, we send it to them and they contact Cisco.
For the first level of support, they always say it's the firewall or the network and we need to prove that it isn't. It's too much back and forth. It's a lot of emails. Maybe it's faster when it's on a call.
Positive
Cisco Duo was really easy to implement.
Umbrella was a little bit difficult because of the documentation. Not everything was documented. We got help from Cisco and the internet.
We used a Cisco consultant for the implementation. They were great. They know nearly everything. For Cisco deployment, they need to know our network, how it works, and so it's not so easy for them, but they did great. When I have questions, I get answers.
Cisco isn't cheap but it's good.
Cisco DNA Center is great, but it's too big for our environment, we don't need it in our company. Before we had classic Cisco infrastructure, now, we are switching to Meraki because it's cheaper and it's not big like DNA Center. DNA Center is great, but it's too big. You need a lot of IT to get it to work.
We also evaluated Unify. Cisco is the leader and we started with Cisco. It's good, so we stay with it.
I would rate it a seven out of ten. It's not like Cisco Duo. Not everything is on one application. It should be easier to get everything in one application, where you can see everything. I would like to see one pane of glass so that we can plug everything into one application in order to see the performance.
The support should also be improved.
Duo Security provides multi-factor authentication for anything that requires multi-factor authentication. It could be our internal corporate services, such as a single sign-on portal, or applications, such as Google Cloud.
It is very easy for users to enroll. There are a lot of insights that we get from using the app on devices that people use to authenticate.
The push notifications and the integrations they offer are valuable. Their mobile app is very useful. It is very easy to use.
The only time I really had some negative feedback for them was about the UI of their mobile app, but they improved it in the last version. There was no way to (re)name 3rd party OTP accounts so it got confusing when multiple ones were existing. In addition, each account took a lot of space on the screen, they condensed it in the new version to make it easier for people that have a lot of accounts added. Duo has a beta program and actively solicits and listens to feedback which personally I think is great.
It is good on the functionality side, but their pricing model is a little bit weird. Currently, there is no price advantage in signing up for yearly contracts. If you are on a monthly term or a yearly contract, you basically pay the same price, and that is very unusual. Normally, there is a discount when someone signs up for the 12-month system.
I have been using this solution probably since 2014. In this company, we have been using it for two years in total.
It is stable. Over the last six or seven years, I didn't have any issues where something wasn't working.
The maximum number of users that I have had is around 600, and I haven't found any issues there. In my current organization, every employee is using this solution. We have 250 employees.
I have not interacted with them. I never had to open a support case.
We didn't have anything in place.
It is pretty straightforward. I just need to log in to an account and integrate systems that should be using Duo Security. That's basically it. It probably took me an hour to roll out the accounts.
IT support helps users if they run into problems with the application, but that's about it. There is no separate team for its maintenance and deployment. There are a lot of service options for our users. They don't even need to contact IT support. On a new phone, they can even do it on their own.
It has provided ROI.
Their pricing model is a little bit weird. Currently, there is no price advantage in signing up for yearly contracts. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing costs.
We looked briefly at Okta Verify. It is the Verify app from Okta to use a single sign-on provider. It had the same price but far less functionality. It was a no-brainer to just go with Duo Security.
I would advise others to look at the integrations that are available and see if they can roll it out to as many applications as they can. Encourage users to use Duo Push versus the six-digit pin code that the applicant generates.
I would rate Duo Security a nine out of ten.
Our primary use case is multifactor authentication for our VPN users. We didn't have multifactor authentication before. After we integrated Duo Security with our systems, everyone has been using it, and it has given us peace of mind when dealing with VPNs.
The most valuable feature of Duo Security is the ability for the user to easily approve access. The application prompts the user, and they can see the location and the IP address. This makes it easy for the user to approve it and go through the process of logging in to the VPN.
Duo Security can be used for any type of authentication apart from that for VPNs. It saves time and prevents problems because it is user-friendly.
Integration between Duo Security and FTDs needs improvement. Integrating Next Generation Firewall safety with Duo Security currently requires a proxy agent between Active Directory and the appliance. It's an additional factor that we need to think about. It would be great to have direct integration with FTD so that we don't have to worry about middleware products. For the rest of the Cisco Secure solutions, the APIs need improvement.
Duo Security needs to improve the delivery of text messages to the users. This has been a big pain point for us over the years. Though we understand that the local telecoms are the ones responsible for the final delivery of the message, there should be a way to improve the process. Some users don't use the application and rely on SMS messages. It is a problem at times because the messages are not delivered.
We've been using Duo Security for almost six years.
We use Cisco Umbrella, ISE, FirePOWER Services, Next Generation Firewalls, FTD, ASA, and Duo Security.
The stability of Duo Security is great. We receive notices for any problems or issues in a very timely manner.
The solution is generally easy to scale. If you have the ability to deploy Duo Security yourself or can leverage third-party integrators, there should not be any issues with scalability.
Cisco support for Duo Security has been great. We haven't had many cases, and most of the ones we have had were related to SMS and text messaging delays.
On a scale from one to ten, I'd rate technical support at eight. They are quick to provide solutions but can improve on working with third-party service suppliers so that end-user experience is better.
Positive
Deploying Duo in our environment was very easy because of the pre-staged configuration. It was very quick, and in one to two days, we had a VPN concentrator using Duo Security.
Duo Security was initially deployed using a consultant, but afterward, we deployed multiple additional VPN concentrators ourselves.
The return on investment has been huge in terms of protection from cyber-attacks. We have been able to protect our employees by having multifactor authentication. This is invaluable for companies in the current threat landscape.
In terms of support, it's always great to have happy users who are able to easily log in to our environment through VPN without having to bother about non-working software agents or any other type of authentication platforms.
My advice to you if you are evaluating Duo Security would be to do your research and compare it to other competitors. If you are a Cisco-oriented company, you will see that there are several benefits to using Duo Security. You will also see that it has the edge over other solutions on the market.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Duo Security at eight. The stability and user experience are great, but there's room for improvement in terms of text message and SMS delivery.
We use Duo Security for two different parts. One is for access to one of the servers, and the other one is for accessing the VPN connection.
It helped free up the time of IT staff. It helped them to manage the control within the users. They can control who gets access to which part of the system. For example, if there is a group of people who need a certain type of permissions, they can set them up easily. They can gather them in groups and give specific permissions. They can also give specific permissions to only one person.
It has been very useful in detecting or fixing threats that come into the organization.
It's a good thing for the authentication of your credentials. It's easy to use for the security part, and it helps to improve our security posture.
They can make authentication easier. It should be done in a shorter time. Sometimes, it can take a bit more time to get the answer on your phone. You have to wait a bit longer to get the SMS code and other things. There can be some internet or connection issues. They should make it faster because sometimes, it's urgent, and you need to access something as soon as possible.
I have been using this solution for about two years.
In general, all Cisco products, not just the Duo product, have a lot of stability.
Their tech support is pretty good, but there are some disadvantages. Sometimes, they take a long time to answer. I understand that some of the issues are not very easy, and it takes time to research them. I'd rate them an eight out of ten.
Positive
We didn't use any non-Cisco products. We were only using Cisco products. The IT part of our organization is using the Duo authentication system, and we are using another part of the server for authentication.
It's not very hard. It doesn't take long. The IT gives us an access code for it.
I just downloaded the app, and after that, just got the security code from that department. I entered that, and it was done. That's it. If you are changing your device and they're just resetting your data, it can take two or three minutes maximum for a new device.
I'd rate Duo Security an eight out of ten.
We are using it for perimeter protection.
We are using it to protect the DMZ servers of our organization. It protects our DMZ servers from malware and web attacks.
It meets our security needs very well. It is easy to use, and documentation is also available.
It is also very stable and scalable, and its support is also very good. We are satisfied with this solution.
Its documentation must be in French because we are a French-speaking country. They should also provide more training documentation.
Its management interface should also be improved. They should also improve its update period. If I compare its update period with other products such as Palo Alto firewalls, this solution is really slow in updates.
I have been using this solution since October 2019.
It is very stable.
It is very scalable. In my company, I have between 90 to 100 users. We also have some users who are working at another site.
We have plans to increase its usage, but due to COVID, we're mostly working remotely.
Their technical support is very good. They are very reactive. The last issue for which I contacted them was related to an OS update.
We have used Check Point and Palo Alto solutions previously.
It is very easy for me. I work with a lot of solutions like this. Its deployment took two weeks.
Its price is reasonable. It is not highly expensive.
We evaluated lots of options from different vendors.
I would recommend this solution. Duo Security is the best solution for the cybersecurity challenges that we are facing nowadays.
I would rate Duo Security a ten out of ten.
We try to use the solution for pretty much everything that we can use with it. The tool helps us to get into our dashboard APIs, and log into Citrix, VPN, and servers.
I love Duo Security's push notifications. It's simple, fast, and secure. From the user's perspective, the solution is seamless. The security aspect is great.
We have been using the product for about two to three years in our company.
I haven't seen any reason to think the solution is unstable.
The product is very scalable from what I have seen.
The solution's support is pretty good. It helped us quite a bit. Both Meraki and TAC have been pretty helpful.
Positive
We switched to Duo Security due to the cybersecurity threats that came with COVID. There was a big one that came against us at one time, but we were able to squash it pretty quickly. The threat was not able to get into the mainframe because of the solution.
The tool's setup was easy and we didn't require too much outside help to set it up.
As a network and security guy, security is my return and it has been better with the product's use.
I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. Duo Security can get spotty at the back end but it doesn't break. It would be great if I could use the product to log into the routers or switches in the infrastructure. We already have Active Directory enabled in our routers and switches. However, if we could do two-factor authentication, then it could go a long way since no one's getting into them unless you want them to. We are all for more security in healthcare.
Duo Security is multi-factor authentication, specifically a two-factor authentication. It authenticates users so that you can know they're legitimate in the network. It can be used for mobile banking. For example, when you're doing mobile or internet banking with your phone, when it uses OTP, it is using Duo Security.
The most valuable features of Duo Security are visibility and OTP authentication. The OTP is very important because it is a self-enrollment feature, you are able to enroll users very quickly with a shorter time period.
Duo Security could improve by being more compatible with other vendors.
I have been using Duo Security for many years.
The solution is highly reliable.
Duo Security is sized per user. You can even have Duo Security for five users or 3,000 users. It depends on the size of the organization.
The solution is scalable.
The technical support is of a very high level. If you have a problem they will be able to support you. They are able to log in remotely as an engineer to give assistance. If you have the upgraded license then the support is even better and they will do everything for you if you have a problem. The support is extremely good.
The installation is very easy to do for Duo Security and it can be done with one person in one hour.
We have one person for maintenance of the solution and they do not need a lot of training to be able to do it. There is a manual that can be followed.
The licensing is very good because it does not cost a lot of money. It's affordable for all-sized customers, including enterprises. There is an additional cost for premium support.
The license can be purchased monthly, quarterly, half-year, or annual.
I would recommend this solution to others. I have seen it being used in large banks and there has never been a complaint about them. It is a very good solution.
I rate Duo Security an eight out of ten.
Our primary use case for Duo Security is all user access to email.
Duo Security improved my organization by helping us secure all access points within the company infrastructure.
Duo Security helped our company consolidate tools, including email and VPN.
What I find most valuable about Duo Security is that it is our one-stop application for multiple MFAs.
Duo Security could be improved with the addition of more applications.
Duo Security has not helped free up our IT department's time.
I have been using Duo Security for six months.
Duo Security's stability is perfect.
Duo Security's ability to scale is perfect. We have 5,000 people using it in four countries.
I have never used Duo Security's support.
We previously used integrated multi-factor security from Microsoft 365 and Fortinet FortiToken. We made the switch to Cisco because we wanted to handle everything in one application.
I was not involved in the initial deployment. I do know however that 10 people were involved in the deployment.
We have seen a return on investment because with Duo Security, we do not have to pay for multiple applications. Instead, we pay for one solution.
The cost of Duo Security licensing is OK.