On my end, Cisco Duo suits my account needs well. The application remains in place. We generally apply Cisco Duo across various use cases. Many customers, including banks and private organizations, use it for enhanced security, particularly in financial and general security tasks.
Security Specialist at zeezsecops.com.ng
Effectively safeguards against unauthorized access attempts or server breaches
Pros and Cons
- "They are users who, as mentioned before, utilize RDPAP and MDPAP. It includes functionalities related to finance, specifically in single sign-on."
- "I believe there are two new features. I am interested in adding auto-admin services and incorporating icons for easier navigation. This could contribute to a new business idea platform. I have seen the features, and they make things easier, resolving issues from before. The platform has been updated, and there's now another link in my platform for media access. When it comes to improvements, the UI can be more user-friendly, and there is room for easier navigation. Perhaps there could be enhancements in customization. I haven't faced issues in storage or backup, but I am open to improvements in customization functionality. It's not my environment, but I see possibilities for improvement in the deployment of funds. The addition of new features is appreciated, and for customization, it could provide more freedom for users."
What is our primary use case?
What needs improvement?
I am interested in adding auto-admin services and incorporating icons for easier navigation. This could contribute to a new business idea platform. I have seen the features, and they make things easier, resolving issues from before. The platform has been updated, and there's now another link in my platform for media access.
When it comes to improvements, the UI can be more user-friendly, and there is room for easier navigation.
There could be enhancements in customization. I haven't had issues with storage or backup, but I am open to improvements in customization functionality. It's not my environment, but I see possibilities for improvement in the deployment of funds.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco Duo for the past year. Customers request server protection using various servers, and it can integrate with applications. It is an MFA solution, designed for server access and data security.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Typically, I manage things directly from the GUI, and I handle whatever comes up. So far, stability has been an issue, but I am not the creator of the solution, so I cannot predict future occurrences.
Generally, it has been fine without any notable issues, but the future is uncertain. I would rate it 8 out of 10.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Duo
April 2025

Learn what your peers think about Cisco Duo. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable and I would rate it 8 out of 10. Regarding the size of your customers, they are mostly large enterprises.
How are customer service and support?
We haven't encountered any significant issues so far. The only time we need to contact support is when something arises, and they promptly address it. Everything else has been running smoothly.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
I would rate it seven because it comes with numerous features that require continuous upgrades. I have observed the need for consistent updates in the inventory. It is beneficial for newcomers to the platform, as data is continuously added, and automation has reduced the effort required to find information. It roughly takes 12 hours to be deployed.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I am not aware of the pricing. There are two departments, and I don't have any information about them.
What other advice do I have?
Cisco Duo effectively safeguards against customer factors, such as unauthorized access attempts or server breaches. It provides a high level of protection, ensuring only authorized individuals have access to the environment. I am confident in its security features.
I would rate it 8 out of 10.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner

Network Technician at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Helps reduce the risk of breaches
Pros and Cons
- "It's a lot easier for our end users to connect to our network. You don't have to type in a code. You get push notifications, that's probably the best thing about it. The fewer clicks they have to do to be online, the better it is. They can easily get into the network and do remote work."
- "I'd like to see it integrated into other applications. I know there are some integrations, but I haven't been able to explore that any further."
What is our primary use case?
We use Duo Security for multi-factor authentication for our VPN.
How has it helped my organization?
We didn't have any MFA previously. Adding that extra layer of security helps.
Duo Security has been pretty good for securing our infrastructure from end to end so that you can detect and remediate threats. We've seen several of our employees leave the country, and we see their connections trying to go through and so forth. We can either add them to allow them access or keep denying that access, and we get alerted to that.
It is pretty good in terms of user authentication and device verification for helping to prevent identity-based attacks. Your device is preauthorized. If somebody steals your device, they still need to know your password. That works out pretty well.
Duo Security helps reduce the risk of breaches. If I had known about it sooner, I'd have got it sooner.
The Self-Service Portal has helped free up our IT staff. Our guys spend a little time, and they can go in and look at how to do things and how to set things up. It makes things a little easier.
Duo Security establishes trust for every access request, no matter where it comes from. We really limit where we cannot be accessed from. It helps to make sure whoever we're letting in is who they're supposed to be.
Duo Security considers all resources to be external. If you treat everything as a threat, you're safer that way.
It has helped our organization improve its cybersecurity resilience.
What is most valuable?
It's a lot easier for our end users to connect to our network. You don't have to type in a code. You get push notifications, that's probably the best thing about it. The fewer clicks they have to do to be online, the better it is. They can easily get into the network and do remote work.
What needs improvement?
I'd like to see it integrated into other applications. I know there are some integrations, but I haven't been able to explore that any further.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using Duo Security for about the last 18 months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It has been awesome. It's been a ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I haven't had a deal with that.
How are customer service and support?
That's pretty good, but we didn't have to use them for this product. In general, Cisco support has been excellent. I'd rate them a nine out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We didn't have MFA. This was our first one. We were using open-source VPN software and decided that we needed to add MFA. We didn't want to patch a bunch of different things together. Cisco AnyConnect and MFA together worked out very well. We also had a Cisco Firepower firewall, and we decided that one vendor for all of it would make it much easier. Its price was also very reasonable. It made it easy for us to make that decision.
How was the initial setup?
It was straightforward. For most things that I've dealt with from Cisco, I've had to do a lot of research to find things, but with Duo Security, everything was right there for us.
What about the implementation team?
We did it in-house. It was easy.
What was our ROI?
Less time is spent trying to figure things out with a bunch of different software. By having one vendor, there's not a lot of extra work that our guys have to do to keep maintaining that.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing was very reasonable.
What other advice do I have?
To someone researching this solution who wants to improve cybersecurity in their organization, I'd say that definitely give it a look. It's easy to set up. It was very easy for us to set up. We even had our Cisco team call us and make sure we had everything going. It was almost no effort, so it's worth a try.
I'd rate Duo Security a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: MSP
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Duo
April 2025

Learn what your peers think about Cisco Duo. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Adds an extra layer of security, is self-managed, and helps remediate threats more quickly
Pros and Cons
- "Multifactor authentication is the most valuable feature."
- "Technical support could be improved. I don't think all support should have to go through an agreement."
What is our primary use case?
With Duo, MFA allows the network to have an authenticated user sign-on seamlessly. If someone's entering a password and their user credentials and they want to get access to the network, the Duo app will have a code that the end-user has to input, which then authenticates them. It's a second layer of security before they can access the network. Even if a third party gets your username and password, without that Duo access, they won't be able to access your network.
How has it helped my organization?
We don't have to worry so much about the end-user that's logging in.
What is most valuable?
Multifactor authentication is the most valuable feature.
As for establishing trust for every access request, that's exactly what this solution does. Outside of having a username and password, you have to get authentication from Duo as well.
You can never eliminate trust, but what Duo Security does do is add an extra layer of security. When it comes to the internet, networks, inbound traffic, and outbound traffic, you're always subject to a potential threat. Duo Security just adds another layer.
It's a great addition to the security of any network infrastructure.
In terms of helping workers feel safe, everyone knows that the information within the enterprise is safe because the people that are logging in have been authenticated in more than one way.
It's pretty easy to maintain network connectivity once it's set up; the end-user uses it to log in. It's not something that you have to constantly manage and deal with apart from pushing updates. It's pretty much self-managed.
In terms of consistency across workspaces, it works all the time, except for when a forced update is needed.
It helped us remediate threats more quickly. For instance, if someone accesses your credentials or you leave your laptop open and someone gains access when it times out, you still need the Duo code that is sent. A new code is always needed to be able to access that laptop or even that phone. Then, from there you're able to safeguard the information that your company has.
Nowadays, data is the number one commodity, so protecting that at all costs is really important. Duo helps with that with end-users. The thing about end-users is that they are volatile. You can't really control what someone does. So, Duo security helps with managing that by having them implement a new time code that's always sensitive.
What needs improvement?
Technical support could be improved. I don't think all support should have to go through an agreement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's very stable. There aren't many issues with Duo.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is just fine. If you scale a certain amount, you have to upgrade and update your license. Outside of that, it's fine.
We are a large organization that deals with a lot of high transactional payments, and we have a large number of users, maybe 100,000 a day, and inbound user traffic.
How are customer service and support?
If you open up a TAC case and they get to you quickly, it's fine. If you have a service agreement that says that they will get back to you within one to two hours, that's fine because you can resolve an issue. Now, if you don't have that agreement and are just a regular user, they take 48 hours to get back to you, and if you and the network team or the security team can't figure out the issue, a lot of money could be lost in two days.
Because there's always room for improvement and because I don't think all support should have to go through an agreement, I would rate technical support at eight on a scale from one to ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
What was our ROI?
Anytime your network is secure and it's not breached or there's no downtime or infiltration of your perimeter, there's always an ROI.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
With regard to pricing, for a small business buying a one-off, it's pretty expensive. If it's an enterprise that has thousands of employees, however, it's really nothing to protect your data because if your network goes down or it's breached, you're losing millions of dollars every minute. When it comes to a large enterprise, it's priced where it should be because you're talking business to business. You're not talking business to consumer.
What other advice do I have?
To leaders who want to build more resilience within their organization's security, I would say that you can't go wrong with Cisco products when it comes to security. You can start with Cisco Umbrella, then go down to their firewalls, and then the next-generation firewalls. Then, you can move down to their end-user security endpoints.
The whole lineup through their security portfolio is really strong. If you're spending $50,000 on a suite and a $100,000 total contract value, you can enter a 3.0 Enterprise Agreement. Then from there, you can lock in prices for one, three, to five years. So, when it comes to any enterprise, when you're talking about security, if you use all of Cisco's security features, from end-user out to your data centers, you'll be pretty well off.
If you have security concerns, implement Duo for your end-users.
Overall, I would rate Duo Security an eight on a scale from one to ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Has efficient authentication features and supports remote access security
Pros and Cons
- "It has continuously evolved by introducing new solutions and products to address emerging security threats in our industry, demonstrating its commitment to staying ahead of evolving security challenges."
- "The product price needs improvement."
What is our primary use case?
My primary use case for Cisco Duo revolves around multifactor authentication, which serves as a secondary layer of security for all users within our organization.
What is most valuable?
The authentication and single sign-on features of Cisco Duo have been particularly valuable for enhancing user identity verification and providing an additional layer of security for our organization.
What needs improvement?
The product price needs improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco Duo for approximately six to seven years. I am using the latest version available.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I rate the platform stability a nine.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We can scale Cisco Duo up or down to accommodate our company's requirements. Around 120 executives in our team utilize it. I rate the scalability an eight.
What was our ROI?
While implementing Cisco Duo may require additional time for secondary multifactor authentication, it has significantly enhanced our organization's security posture, providing valuable returns in terms of heightened security measures.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I rate the product pricing a seven out of ten.
What other advice do I have?
The platform plays a crucial role in supporting our organization's remote access security needs by serving as the secondary email security for our VPN, thereby enabling secure remote access for our employees.
It has continuously evolved by introducing new solutions and products to address emerging security threats in our industry, demonstrating its commitment to staying ahead of evolving security challenges.
If the pricing aligns with their budget, I recommend considering Cisco Duo for its robust security features and scalability. It is highly adaptable and scalable, making it suitable for organizations of various sizes within the industry. Thus, there are no significant considerations to be made regarding infrastructure compatibility.
I rate it an eight out of ten overall.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
CTO at EyePea
Makes the attack vector smaller and improves the security of our customer's networks
Pros and Cons
- "Multifactor authentication and secure two-factor authentication are the most valuable features. It's been around for a while, but now it's becoming an enforced behavior as opposed to something that you used to do as optional."
- "I'm not a big fan of relicensing products every year or two years, but that's the model at the moment. I prefer to go back to licensing perpetually or permanent licensing."
What is our primary use case?
We use a number of Cisco products specifically, Cisco Umbrella and Duo.
Our primary use case is to enhance our client's security and their digital security model; Secure DNS, malware protection, MFA, and MDM services for their premium devices and their office devices.
How has it helped my organization?
Cisco has improved our organization by making the attack vector smaller and improving the security of our customer's networks and by extension, enhancing our reputation.
Using Cisco has saved us time and money. It also saves us from the threat of a loss of money by cyberattacks. It saves us months of technical effort and loss of billable hours.
It has also helped to reduce our operating expenditures.
What is most valuable?
Multifactor authentication and secure two-factor authentication are the most valuable features. It's been around for a while, but now it's becoming an enforced behavior as opposed to something that you used to do as optional.
When it comes to securing infrastructure from end to end so that we can detect and remediate it, it's pretty good. It's a little proprietary. A lot of it is based around its own ecosystem and we've started looking at other solutions that are more open-source or a bit open to more collaboration. That's something that we're picking up with Cisco.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco solutions for two to three years.
How are customer service and support?
Their support is very good, especially at an executive level and account director level. They'll always find you the right person if they're not the right person to help you do something.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
What was our ROI?
My own company and our customers have seen ROI from using Cisco. The customer specifically does not lose time anymore in cyberattacks, malware, and devices being affected or hijacked.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I'm not a big fan of relicensing products every year or two years, but that's the model at the moment. I prefer to go back to licensing perpetually or permanent licensing.
What other advice do I have?
We chose Cisco because it's very good, very well understood, has a good reputation, and has a strong support community around it. There is good technical expertise if you need it.
I would rate Cisco an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Network Engineer at Eurobank
Is stable and gives the ability to restrict the regions from which a user can log in
Pros and Cons
- "I like the set time that users can log into devices during the day and how many times they can do so. I also like the ability to restrict the regions from which the user can get in. Users outside of our country or even the town cannot log in."
- "I would like to see Duo Security increase the time that the users have to log into the devices. The maximum time interval is 50 minutes at the moment, and I would like it to be 60 minutes. When you try to log into a device and have to authenticate yourself, sometimes it's not very pleasant. It's not the best thing particularly if you have to do this every 50 minutes, which is the maximum time that Duo gives. This makes it difficult to use and does not save time."
What is our primary use case?
We are still implementing the solution and are not in full production mode yet. We implemented Duo Security in comparison with ICE, and we use it to secure our environments. It helps us authenticate users that use our network devices.
How has it helped my organization?
We hope to increase our security posture with Duo Security.
What is most valuable?
I like the set time that users can log into devices during the day and how many times they can do so. I also like the ability to restrict the regions from which the user can get in. Users outside of our country or even the town cannot log in.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see Duo Security increase the time that the users have to log into the devices. The maximum time interval is 15 minutes at the moment, and I would like it to be 60 minutes.
When you try to log into a device and have to authenticate yourself, sometimes it's not very pleasant. It's not the best thing particularly if you have to do this every 15 minutes, which is the maximum time that Duo gives. This makes it difficult to use and does not save time.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been working with Duo Security for six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
So far, we haven't had any issues with stability.
How are customer service and support?
My experience with technical support has been generally good, but sometimes, there is a delay in getting answers. I would rate them at eight on a scale from one to ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
Duo Security was easy to set up. It took us almost a week to read the manual and understand what we have to implement to go into production.
What other advice do I have?
Duo Security is very helpful and fits what we were looking for to satisfy the requirements of our security office. On a scale from one to ten, with ten being the best, I would rate Duo Security at eight.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Aerospace Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Enables us to pick out unsuccessful login attempts quickly and shut down those accounts proactively
Pros and Cons
- "The ability for users to authenticate via phone, from any random phone number, has been very helpful for managing a distributed workforce. Using it across a distributed network for securing access to our applications is big for us."
- "We have users who move throughout the world, and their levels of connectivity change. It can be a challenge, if someone is in Bahrain, to authenticate via Duo."
What is our primary use case?
We wanted multi-factor authentication across a variety of platforms.
How has it helped my organization?
It's improved security by enforcing strong, reliable multi-factor authentication, and it has reduced intrusions across our organization. It makes sure all the user sessions are at least a little more trustful than if we just had single-factor.
In terms of remediating threats, we are able to pick out unsuccessful login attempts pretty quickly on the Duo platform and we can shut down those accounts. It makes us more proactive. That works well.
What is most valuable?
The ability for users to authenticate via phone, from any random phone number, has been very helpful for managing a distributed workforce. Using it across a distributed network for securing access to our applications is big for us. It works very well, and we have no major complaints about the integration of any of our third-party applications.
We have a high level of confidence in the platform, especially for identifying potential logins from unexpected geolocations. The data associated with logs is very helpful for helping to make that determination.
It's very important for us that Duo Security considers all resources to be external, especially as we lead up to Zero Trust. It needs to be like that.
What needs improvement?
End-users find it more annoying than anything else. It's tough to manage user perception of the service, especially when there isn't feature parity between Mac and Windows users. There are some challenges in making that user experience the same between platforms and helping users feel the least amount of burden possible while helping to ensure the organization's security.
Network connectivity depends on where users are located. Internally, on-premises, it's not hard keeping connectivity, but we have users who move throughout the world, and their levels of connectivity change. It can be a challenge, if someone is in Bahrain, to authenticate via Duo.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Duo Security for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We've had no issues with the stability of Duo. I consider it to be a stable product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It has scaled to meet our needs. I don't know how it scales if you have 10,000 or 20,000 users, but for our organization, with fewer than 5,000 users, it's been fine.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support has been adequate. They are responsive regarding support for troubleshooting tickets. We haven't had any issues that required escalation, so we've been happy with it.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did have a previous solution. The interoperability has been improved with Duo compared to that solution.
How was the initial setup?
Our physical deployment of the solution is in the continental United States, but our users are worldwide.
What other advice do I have?
I don't place too much value on any single product, since placing too much trust in one thing creates a single point of failure. This is just a single piece in a broader spectrum of security products to accomplish our actual goals.
Building resilience is nice, but there's a point of diminishing returns when it comes to doing that. Part of my job is to help our leaders understand where that diminishing return is.
The single pane of glass management is desirable, but it's like a unicorn. No single pane of glass is ever really a single pane of glass. That's something that would be nice, but it's not something I expect.
Duo is a very consistent product and flexible in how it can be deployed and has good support. It's a product we're very happy with.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
CTO at Trust-IT Solutions
Authenticates our domain and users, making the process more secure
What is our primary use case?
We're using Cisco Duo to authenticate our domain and users.
How has it helped my organization?
We use Cisco the most. It helps us with authentication, making the process more secure. Duo facilitates authentication whenever we try to log in to a machine, making the initial process quick and easy. We no longer need to type in numbers, which is very convenient.
What is most valuable?
Cisco is a very simple solution. It has integration with BroadSoft.
What needs improvement?
There is one issue. We use our SMS messaging tool, but with Cisco Duo, you must use their service. They should allow integration with other SMS providers via API.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco Duo for six months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is stable. I rate it as ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution's scalability is good. 1000 users, including admins and developers, are using this solution.
I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten.
How are customer service and support?
Cisco's technical support is a bit cumbersome.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We use Google Authenticator and Okta. First, integration with BroadSoft was very important to us. Second, the initial deployment of the product was very straightforward and simple. After running a POC, we realized the product would be easy to maintain.
How was the initial setup?
Deployment is pretty simple. It can sometimes be a bit cumbersome, but it works well once you get it set up. It takes a few days and one person to complete.
Overall, it’s a straightforward and effective solution. I rate it as eight out of ten, whereas ten is the easiest.
What about the implementation team?
We need to configure it. But then the initial setup is very short and simple.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is expensive. I rate it as eight out of ten, whereas ten is expensive.
What other advice do I have?
Cisco Duo integrates with Microsoft Active Directory for login using an on-premise deployment. It also connects to cloud services, including CrowdStrike, making it a hybrid tool.
We're using Cisco Duo to enhance our security. Before implementing it, deploying advanced security solutions like MFA for every login was challenging. Each time I logged into Cisco, I had to enter new numbers, which was time-consuming and cumbersome. Now, with Cisco Duo, the login process has become much simpler. You click to log in. While it may not directly save us money, it saves time and contributes to our overall security posture.
I recommend the solution since everyone wants this type of solution to be very simple, just to work, easy to deploy, very simple, usable, and Cisco Duo checks all those boxes.
Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Duo Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2025
Product Categories
Authentication Systems Single Sign-On (SSO) ZTNA as a Service Cisco Security Portfolio Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Entra ID
Okta Workforce Identity
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator
Ping Identity Platform
Yubico YubiKey
Fortinet FortiToken
RSA SecurID
CyberArk Identity
Silverfort
Symantec VIP Access Manager
Thales Authenticators
ESET EDR/XDR
UserLock
Entrust Identity Enterprise
RSA Authentication Manager
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Duo Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?
- How would you compare Cisco Duo Security with other Authentication Systems products?
- Which solution do you prefer: Duo Security or RSA SecurID Access?
- When evaluating Authentication Systems, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Why is Authentication Systems important for companies?
- Which front-end product for authorization and authentication into an Apache Web Server application, PIXIA, would you recommend?
- What is the difference between SPML and SAML?
- How would you compare Cisco Duo Security with other Authentication Systems products?
- What is CAPTCHA and how does it work? How can you use it for Artificial Intelligence (AI)?
- What are some alternatives for UserLock?