I use this solution as a network switch and I provide service to the switches to my customers.
Network Security Expert at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Easy to use, good performance, but priced high
Pros and Cons
- "The main features of this solution are performance and ease of use."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The main features of this solution are performance and ease of use.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for approximately 20 years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have some clients with approximately 1,600 users using the solution.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Ethernet Switches
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Ethernet Switches. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
How was the initial setup?
The installation is straightforward. You can configure most switches in approximately 45 minutes.
What about the implementation team?
I have done many implementations of the solution. We have an engineer and a technician that does the maintenance for this solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There is a license required for this solution and the price could be better.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Cisco Ethernet Switches a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
VP of IT at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Scalable and stable with a variety of models to choose from
Pros and Cons
- "We only deal with Cisco products, they are very good."
- "There are some GUI configuration improvements that they can implement in the future for the product models."
What is our primary use case?
We are using the solution for LAN routing in both manufacturing industries and IT sectors. We use a variety of different models of the solution. We have used the 4000, 9000, 9200, and 9400 Series switches. Currently, we are deploying the 9000 Series to customers at data centers and when it comes to core switches at data centers we are using the 9400 model.
What needs improvement?
There are some GUI configuration improvements that they can implement in the future for the product models.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for over forteen years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have found the solution to be stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable. We have deployed more than 1000 switches to customers.
How are customer service and technical support?
We provide support for the client.
What about the implementation team?
We do the deployment of the solution using a team of approximately five people. The time it takes to do the deployment all depends on the client's requirements. The range of time it can take varies depending on the design and architecture involved.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
There are different licensing based on the model of the solution.
What other advice do I have?
We only deal with Cisco products, they are very good.
I rate Cisco Ethernet Switches a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Ethernet Switches
December 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Ethernet Switches. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IT Manager at a renewables & environment company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Good performance and simplifies operations through minimal maintenance
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the performance."
- "Cisco needs to include new features to attract new customers."
What is our primary use case?
Cisco Ethernet Switches are being used as part of our new data centers.
How has it helped my organization?
This solution helps us simplify operations through minimal maintenance and ease of patching.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the performance.
The Cisco Feature Navigator is a web-based application that enables you to quickly match Cisco IOS, IOS XE, IOS XR, NX-OS, and CatOS software releases to features. This is available to all Cisco.com users, both registered and non-registered guests.
What needs improvement?
Cisco needs to include new features to attract new customers.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco Ethernet solutions for the last 20 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This solution is stable enough that it will not create problems in everyday usage.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This system can accommodate expansion without hampering the existing workflow and ensure an increase in output or efficiency.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer service is good. They are responsive within the time frame and resolve our issues.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I haven't used a different solution. We did the upgrade as part of the lifecycle when the previous equipment became end-of-life. It was time for the investment. At the same time, we were building out new data centers.
How was the initial setup?
The setup was straightforward and it is easy to deploy.
What about the implementation team?
We have implemented with the help of a vendor and we have an in-house team that is taking care of maintenance.
What was our ROI?
ROI is doubled with the solution.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did not evaluate other options before choosing Cisco.
What other advice do I have?
I will advise others to buy without any hesitation, as the product quality and deliverables are far more than others without comparing cost. This solution is the best.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Network Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Excellent stability, with good routing features and compatibility with other brands
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is compatible with many brands, such as VMware."
- "The price could be lower. It's quite expensive."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for infrastructure.
How has it helped my organization?
The solution itself is great for our organization's infrastructure. You can connect a WiFi product and an ethernet product at the same time.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable aspect of the solution is its routing features.
The solution is compatible with many brands, such as VMware.
It offers very good durability if your configuration is good.
What needs improvement?
The interface needs improvement. The solution could use more features and more functionality.
The price could be lower. It's quite expensive.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for 20 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of the solution is perfect, although sometimes we have firmware problems. If we have a bug or something similar, sometimes it's hard to get a quick response to the problem.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of the solution, from what I understand, is good. We haven't actually tested the solution for scalability ourselves, however.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is good. However, we need to pay if we want to have them analyze incidents. It's not in the standard package.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is complex. You always need to change the configuration to adapt it to your needs. On top of that, actually adapting it is quite difficult. Deployment can take anywhere from a few hours to a few days, depending on the functionality your organization requires.
What about the implementation team?
We had the assistance of a distributor for implementing the solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is very expensive.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did evaluate other options. We evaluated for readability, stability, price, and end of life. Cisco ultimately won out.
What other advice do I have?
We use various deployment models, including on-premises and cloud.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
Senior Solution Architect at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
DNA is a very good way to do the configuration of all the equipment
Pros and Cons
- "Good and stable operational experience with nearly no loss of hardware and very few software bugs."
- "DNA Center is very interesting in automating the setup and monitoring as with each occurrence it gets easier to troubleshoot and provides an impression about what could be the problem."
- "Location of customers to connect clients to the servers and transport the data and VoIP in parallel with QoS and NBAR with 802.1X."
What is our primary use case?
- Collecting Clients in the floors.
- Concentrate distribution and to forward over routers to other parts.
- Fiber and copper ports with enhanced power over Ethernet and stacks.
- NM-modules with 10G
How has it helped my organization?
- Good and stable operational experience with nearly no loss of hardware and very few software bugs.
- Plug and play works now.
- DNA is a very good way to do the configuration of all the equipment.
What is most valuable?
DNA Center is very interesting in automating the setup and monitoring as with each occurrence it gets easier to troubleshoot and provides an impression about what could be the problem.
What needs improvement?
Location of customers to connect clients to the servers and transport the data and VoIP in parallel with QoS and NBAR with 802.1X.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT support network at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Good features, performance, and reliability
Pros and Cons
- "Its performance and reliability are valuable."
- "Its management should be improved."
What is our primary use case?
I am using it for core data infrastructure. I am using model 9600.
What is most valuable?
Its performance and reliability are valuable.
What needs improvement?
Its management should be improved.
It is not easy to scale.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for seven years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is not easy to scale. We have between 1,000 to 2,000 users.
How are customer service and support?
I have not interacted with them. We have a contractor for support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We also have Surecom and NETGEAR, but Cisco comes under a different class. They differ in price. Cisco is the best for our company.
How was the initial setup?
Its initial setup is simple. The deployment duration can take 10 to 30 minutes depending on the model.
What about the implementation team?
We deployed it internally.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is expensive. There are additional costs besides the license cost.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend it for its features and reliability. I would rate it an eight out of 10.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
RF Planning Manager at Sabafon
High quality, stability solid, scalable, feature functions need updating
Pros and Cons
- "We have found it to be scalable. We have approximately three million subscribers."
- "In the future, some of the features could be updated to support the latest functions."
What is our primary use case?
We are a GSM mobile network operator and we use the solution for internet data.
What is most valuable?
Cisco is a large company and their product is very good with high quality. The features and customer support are good.
What needs improvement?
In the future, some of the features could be updated to support the latest functions.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for approximately ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is really stable we have not had a problem in the ten years we have been using it.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have found it to be scalable. We have approximately three million subscribers.
What about the implementation team?
We have 20 internal engineers that do all the installation, configuration and aftercare of the product.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is an expensive product.
What other advice do I have?
If there is another product cheaper than Ciscos and runs just as well we would switch but currently, we are satisfied.
I would recommend the solution to others.
I rate Cisco Ethernet Switches a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Manager of Data Center at a integrator with 51-200 employees
Cisco Ethernet Switches have a reputation for delivering high performance, scalability and security features for TCP/IP networks
Valuable Features:
Few pros on the Cisco ethernet switches are:
1 )Power saving design architecture
2) CDP, Cisco network discovery protocol, Smartports which make management and port configuration extremely easy and efficient
3) Increased confidentiality with MACSec layer-2 encryption
4) StackPower which helps in increasing power availability
5) Efficient QoS with priority for critical cooling
6) Added on support with hot swap, redundant power supplies and cooling
Room for Improvement:
Few cons on the cisco switches are
1) Pricing strategies
2) Gigabit EtherChannel
3) Port based ACL
4) Ingress and Egress filtering not present in all
5) IGMP snooping and ISL trunking feature not present in few good series switches
Other Advice:
Cisco has built upon its reputation in delivering high quality ethernet switches for small scale to enterprise level needs. Whether it be the Cisco 100/200 series, a few things which standout are the energy efficient technology for Gigabit ethernet, network performance through QoS, silent operation through fan less design, IPv6 support, and the green technology approach.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
it_user114003Infrastructure Network Architect at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
I have found the Cisco hardware (routers, switches, appliances) to be very reliable. We recently implement 7 Cisco UCS Chassis. We have migrated our entire Virtual Machine inventory, done several PtoV's, but still have another 100 or so servers/appliances to move into this new environment.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Ethernet Switches Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: December 2024
Product Categories
Ethernet SwitchesPopular Comparisons
Aruba Switches
NETGEAR Switches
MikroTik Routers and Switches
Ubiquiti UniFi Switches
Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches
Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access
Arista Networks Platform
D-Link Ethernet Switches
Meraki MS Switches
Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches
Huawei Ethernet Switches
HPE Ethernet Switches
NVIDIA Mellanox
MikroTik Cloud Router Switch
H3C Ethernet Switches
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Ethernet Switches Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Juniper vs Cisco ethernet switches: Which one is better?
- Why does Cisco dominate the ethernet switching market?
- Would you recommend replacing a Cisco Catalyst Switch by a D-link one?
- Which are the best Ethernet Switch vendors/products suitable for an enterprise?
- How do NETGEAR switches compare with Cisco ethernet switches?
- How would you improve Cisco and Juniper Ethernet Switches?
- How to disable TLS 1.0 in a Cisco SG300 switch?
- Which would you choose - Fortinet Fortiswitch secure access or Cisco Ethernet Switches?
- In terms of ethernet switches, would you go with Cisco or Juniper?
- Is there any available comparison table between 3Com H3C Switch vs Cisco Ethernet Switch?
DNA is relatively new product even it gets use of some matured features in the background. But it is quite a change on how we do access layer management. What I like about the solution, I could preserve my investment in the legacy hardware when deploy DNA. Older switches (not all - please, consult feature support for Cisco equipment) could be integrated into DNA matrix.