Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo

Top 10 Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Alternatives

Vendor: Cisco
4.0 out of 5
Post review

Top Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint Email Protection, and Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Cisco Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
4.2 out of 5
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense offers superior threat protection with straightforward deployment and a favorable ROI. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 excels with deep integration into the Microsoft ecosystem, providing comprehensive features despite higher initial costs, appealing to those seeking extensive platform integration.
Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Report
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense setup costs are generally higher due to its advanced features, while Microsoft Defender for Office 365 offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a cost-effective option for basic email threat protection.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense setup costs are generally higher due to its advanced features, while Microsoft Defender for Office 365 offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a cost-effective option for basic email threat protection.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Proofpoint Email Protection
4.2 out of 5
Proofpoint Email Protection is praised for pricing, ease of use, and advanced detection, making it ideal for users prioritizing simplicity and effectiveness. In comparison, Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense offers rich features and ecosystem integrations, appealing to those seeking comprehensive, integrated solutions.
Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Proofpoint Email Protection Report
Proofpoint Email Protection requires a higher initial setup cost, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a primary difference in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Proofpoint Email Protection requires a higher initial setup cost, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense offers a more budget-friendly setup, highlighting a primary difference in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP)
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection integrates seamlessly with Windows and Office 365, offering features like anti-phishing and DLP. In comparison, Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense provides robust internal threat detection and valuable Threat Grid sandboxing, integrating with Cisco's broader security ecosystem for comprehensive protection.
Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) Report
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) has a lower setup cost, focusing on affordability, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) has a lower setup cost, focusing on affordability, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting its comprehensive features.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Abnormal Security
4.8 out of 5
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Abnormal Security
4.8 out of 5
Abnormal Security offers competitive pricing and excels in threat detection through behavioral analysis. In comparison, Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense provides extensive threat intelligence and advanced malware protection, with superior long-term ROI justifying its higher initial costs for comprehensive security measures.
Download Abnormal Security vs. Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Report
Abnormal Security offers a straightforward setup process, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense can be more complex and time-consuming. The ease of implementation highlights Abnormal's user-friendly approach compared to the technical demands of configuring Cisco's solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Abnormal Security offers a straightforward setup process, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense can be more complex and time-consuming. The ease of implementation highlights Abnormal's user-friendly approach compared to the technical demands of configuring Cisco's solution.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Kiteworks
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Kiteworks
4.4 out of 5

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Kiteworks Report
It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it.
The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API.
View comparison
Pricing
It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it.
The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API.
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Fortra's Agari
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense Logo
Fortra's Agari
4.3 out of 5
Fortra's Agari emphasizes AI-driven threat detection, focusing on phishing and business email compromise, offering affordability and streamlined deployment. In comparison, Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense delivers a comprehensive feature set with robust threat intelligence, appealing to organizations seeking extensive security capabilities.
Download Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense vs. Fortra's Agari Report
Fortra's Agari typically involves higher setup costs, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense is more cost-effective in initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortra's Agari typically involves higher setup costs, while Cisco Secure Email Threat Defense is more cost-effective in initial implementation.

Related categories

Email Security
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Microsoft Security Suite