ACCELQ Automate vs Testim comparison

Read 10 Testim reviews

3,053 Views
2,156 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ACCELQ Automate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ACCELQ Automate and Testim based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: March 2025).

Test Automation Tools

Download the complete report

Helped 842,690 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACCELQ Automate

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Testim

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of ACCELQ Automate is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 4.9%, up from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Provides good stability and a valuable object identification feature

We evaluated data testing for millions of records. As per architecture, it can efficiently run a few thousands of records. However, we couldn't implement it for millions of records. Thus, it works well for a small amount of data. We have 30 users for it in our organization and use it daily. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

Read full review

PiyushSingh

Director at Xceedance

A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment

There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better response to what requires improvement in the product. I only manage the team that uses Testim. I cannot be exactly described as an end user of the tool. There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it. There were some trial and error methods our company had to deal with while using the product's documentation, after which we were able to get through the setup phase. I want the documentation to have more information to help users with the setup process. I want the product to be more scalable in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform contributes to faster test release cycles."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"The product is easy to use."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

More Testim pros

Cons

"The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACCELQ Automate?

The platform contributes to faster test release cycles.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACCELQ Automate?

I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten. It can be optimized.

What needs improvement with ACCELQ Automate?

The platform's reporting aspects can be broader and include more granular details. Additionally, there could be a capability to automatically generate automation scripts extracting the user data fr...

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

Katalon Studio vs ACCELQ Automate

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 20% of the time

Testsigma vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 18% of the time

Functionize vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 13% of the time

Eggplant Test vs ACCELQ Automate

Compared 9% of the time

More ACCELQ Automate Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 51% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 13% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 3% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Test Automation Tools

Download ACCELQ Automate product report

Download Testim product report

Overview

The most powerful test automation tool for web, desktop, mainframes and more.

ACCELQ

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

FISCHER, optanix, ERICSSON, BenifitMall, QuickPivot, DIGITALFUEL, westcreek

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Test Automation Tools