Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024
Acronis Cyber Protect and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery both offer robust disaster recovery solutions. Acronis Cyber Protect is noted for better pricing and support, while AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is favored for its comprehensive features.
Features: Acronis Cyber Protect users highlight integrated backup, anti-malware protection, and robust support. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for its seamless integration with AWS services, automated disaster recovery, and advanced security features. AWS stands out with its extensive feature set and technical integration.
Room for Improvement: Acronis Cyber Protect needs enhancements in system resource usage, faster backup speeds, and improved scalability. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery requires better usability, simpler setup processes, and more detailed documentation. Both products have specific areas for refinement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acronis Cyber Protect is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, while more sophisticated, needs improvements in deployment simplicity and customer support responsiveness. Acronis leads in deployment simplicity and support.
Pricing and ROI: Acronis Cyber Protect is generally cost-effective with a solid ROI. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is viewed as more expensive but justified by its feature set and performance. Acronis is favorable for budget-conscious users, while AWS offers a stronger ROI for those investing in extensive capabilities.
