Acronis Cyber Protect and Zerto compete in the cyber protection and disaster recovery category. Acronis Cyber Protect has the upper hand for comprehensive support and better pricing, while Zerto is recognized for superior features and reliability.
Features: Acronis Cyber Protect is known for user-friendly integration, advanced cybersecurity features, and seamless backup and recovery processes. Zerto stands out with powerful disaster recovery, continuous data protection, and efficient failover capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Acronis Cyber Protect could enhance scalability and real-time monitoring. Zerto users suggest improving user guidance and simplifying configurations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acronis Cyber Protect users find deployment straightforward and praise responsive customer support. Zerto users face a steeper learning curve but acknowledge effective customer service once running.
Pricing and ROI: Acronis Cyber Protect is cost-effective with quicker ROI due to lower setup costs. Zerto has higher initial costs but offers long-term value through robust performance.
The return on investment is evident, as Zerto saves more than 60 percent of time in various operations compared to the previous manual processes.
Most people like me hope we never have to use it. It is like insurance.
Having seen the product and how it works and its reliability, it seems it will pay for itself.
The support takes too much time to respond to callbacks.
I have never had an issue that was not resolved, and I have never been in a situation where they did not respond.
I would give them a rating of ten because it represents the highest level of support based on the technical knowledge of the support team, response time, and effectiveness of the provided resolutions.
We receive support around the clock, which is excellent.
Acronis Cyber Protect is a scalable product.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
By adding more hosts and installing VRAs on each, tasks can be efficiently managed.
I would rate Zerto a ten out of ten for scalability.
The stability of Acronis Cyber Protect is very high.
I promptly delete the malfunctioning elements and set them up again to resume replication, ensuring stability.
I consulted with tech support, and we determined the solution was to move the main workload to a resource-available ESX box.
It is 100% stable.
The Protect environment should automatically secure the last backup screens to prevent any changes, even by an admin.
If I have 350 objects that I am protecting, I would like Zerto to be able to fire them up in one order, rather than having to manually bring them up in a sequence.
To increase accessibility for small and medium businesses, Zerto should consider a competitive pricing strategy, possibly including subscription-based licensing options.
The main issue with Zerto is its user interface, which lacks flexibility and presents a steep learning curve.
I would rate the price as nine out of ten.
If you want a good-quality tool that is robust and does a good job for you, you have to pay a higher price to get that, and Zerto is no different.
However, it can become quite expensive when you start looking at the number of workloads you have in the environment and what you would like to do.
One of Zerto's main disadvantages is its pricing structure, which involves significant upfront costs and limited options for startups with minimal initial funding.
The NASDAQ level CFS level backup is the feature I find most beneficial for our data protection strategy.
Zerto offers excellent technical support with responsive and helpful experts.
If we were attacked, I could revert to a backup from five seconds before the attack, and no one would know we were attacked.
The replication time and the minor amount of time it takes to sync a new server outside of any of my huge 40-terabyte boxes is ridiculously quick.
Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.