Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Acunetix vs HackerOne comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 14, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix
Ranking in Application Security Tools
18th
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
19th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (14th), DevSecOps (6th)
HackerOne
Ranking in Application Security Tools
34th
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
42nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Bug Bounty Platforms (1st), Penetration Testing Services (2nd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (12th)
 

Featured Reviews

JanetMuhia - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 12, 2024
Provides proof of exploit, gives the specific code affected and enables a shift-left approach in the development process
We are a consultant company.  Just by scanning, Acunetix provides proof of exploit and gives the specific code affected. You can also see a categorized list of vulnerabilities. From there, you can easily create a report. It integrates with multiple tools in the CI/CD pipeline, like Jira and web…
VS
Sep 16, 2024
They have streamlined the complete process, which gives a sense of security to the users
I mainly use it for downtime activities, earning extra cash alongside a full-time job, and to get new sales and profits It helps me to get new sales, profits, and other benefits. The main thing I like about HackerOne is that it provides a direct way to contact the program directly without the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Picks up weaknesses in our app setups."
"The solution is highly stable."
"By integrating with CI/CD tools, it enables a shift-left approach in the development process."
"There is a lot of documentation on their website which makes setting it up and using it quite simple."
"The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code."
"The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"Acunetix is the best service in the world. It is easy to manage. It gives a lot of information to the users to see and identify problems in their site or applications. It works very well."
"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."
"It helps me to get new sales, profits, and other benefits."
"Apart from getting all the bug bounty opportunities, we also get the chance to practice in a safe environment, like a demo setup. These features are great for beginners who want to explore bug bounties in the future."
"The most valuable feature of HackerOne is its variety of programs. These programs provide depth into various areas, such as mobile, API, and websites."
 

Cons

"It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved."
"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."
"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."
"Acunetix needs to be dynamic with JavaScript code, unlike Netsparker which can scan complex agents."
"The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans."
"It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"Currently only supports web scanning."
"The ability to view the conversation between the triagers and the programs will be really good."
"One issue I've experienced is traffic. Many people try to participate when an opportunity with a bounty of around 1,000-15,000 dollars comes up. In this case, the first person to report the vulnerability gets the bounty. If a second person reports the same vulnerability, they are marked as duplicated instead of receiving some recognition. The second person also invested time finding the issue, so I think this can be improved."
"Response time can be improved. The HackerOne Trust team can be slow to respond sometimes. They're not using AI, which could help reduce the number of duplicate reports."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"The price is exceptionally high."
"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."
"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."
"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."
"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."
"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."
"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."
"The solution is free."
"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
I would recommend Acunetix to others for their web vulnerability scanning needs. Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten.
What needs improvement with HackerOne?
Response time can be improved. The HackerOne Trust team can be slow to respond sometimes. They're not using AI, which could help reduce the number of duplicate reports.
What is your primary use case for HackerOne?
I use the tool for vulnerability assessment and testing.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

AcuSensor
HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
Zenefits, Adobe, Yelp
Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. HackerOne and other solutions. Updated: August 2024.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.