Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Acunetix vs Snyk comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Acunetix enhances security and saves costs by identifying vulnerabilities, offering significant ROI and assurance in application releases.
Sentiment score
6.8
Snyk enhances developer efficiency by quickly identifying and fixing vulnerabilities, though ROI varies across organizations.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.4
Acunetix support is available 24/7 but varies in responsiveness; satisfaction levels depend on user experience and response times.
Sentiment score
7.5
Snyk’s support is praised for responsiveness and skill, with customers appreciating clear documentation and dedicated Customer Success Managers.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Our long-standing association has ensured smooth communication, resulting in favorable support experiences and satisfactory issue resolution.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Acunetix excels in scalability and adaptability, supporting diverse user needs and cloud environments for enterprises, despite Linux constraints.
Sentiment score
7.6
Snyk is a scalable, lightweight solution praised for seamless integration and adaptability, despite slower processing with multiple vulnerabilities.
Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Acunetix offers reliable, stable performance with minimal maintenance, rare glitches, and effective support during updates, earning high user ratings.
Sentiment score
8.0
Snyk is stable with minimal downtime, praised support, though limited documentation and integration can cause minor issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Acunetix needs improvements in integrations, speed, clarity, and customization, with challenges in licensing, false positives, and jargon.
Snyk users seek better language support, UI, integration, documentation, IDE plugins, customer support, cost-efficiency, and compatibility enhancements.
The support program was helpful in addressing it.
It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for that functionality.
 

Setup Cost

Acunetix's pricing is seen as high by some, competitive by others, with concerns about licensing complexity and transparency.
Snyk offers competitive enterprise pricing with clear licensing, justified by comprehensive features and flexibility in project usage.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
Snyk is recognized as the cheapest option we have evaluated.
 

Valuable Features

Acunetix offers user-friendly, comprehensive scanning with detailed reporting, minimal false positives, and robust integration capabilities for efficient vulnerability management.
Snyk offers seamless integration, accurate vulnerability detection, and automation to enhance security with a strong developer focus.
I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention.
Our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
 

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix
Ranking in Application Security Tools
16th
Ranking in DevSecOps
6th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (13th), Vulnerability Management (21st)
Snyk
Ranking in Application Security Tools
4th
Ranking in DevSecOps
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (7th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (3rd), Software Development Analytics (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.6%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk is 7.9%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami - PeerSpot reviewer
Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup
The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
Affordable tool boosts code scanning efficiency but faces integration hurdles
The most important feature of Snyk is its cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions such as Check Point. It is easy to consolidate Snyk across multiple entities within a large organization. Additionally, our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
I use Acunetix for penetration testing purposes. This is the primary use case.
What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
I rate the overall solution nine out of ten. I prefer Acunetix for its more precise and accurate results.
How does Snyk compare with SonarQube?
Snyk does a great job identifying and reducing vulnerabilities. This solution is fully automated and monitors 24/7 to find any issues reported on the internet. It will store dependencies that you a...
What do you like most about Snyk?
The most effective feature in securing project dependencies stems from its ability to highlight security vulnerabilities.
What needs improvement with Snyk?
Snyk has several limitations, including issues with Gradle, NPM, and Xcode, and trouble with AutoPR. It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

AcuSensor
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
StartApp, Segment, Skyscanner, DigitalOcean, Comic Relief
Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Snyk and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.