Acunetix and Snyk are leading security tools competing in the application protection category. Snyk is seen as superior due to its comprehensive features and smoother integration into workflows, which justify its cost.
Features: Acunetix offers comprehensive vulnerability scanning that consistently identifies critical threats. It also provides competitive pricing and solid customer support, making it attractive to budget-conscious buyers. Snyk, on the other hand, integrates seamlessly with developer workflows, offers real-time vulnerability fixes, and supports complex environments, with users favoring its flexible integration capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix users express the need for enhanced reporting functionalities, wider range of environment support, and increased responsiveness in customer service. Snyk could improve in expanding language support, refining administrative controls, and offering more comprehensive deployment documentation for users looking for better guidance.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix provides straightforward deployment options but has varied feedback regarding customer support responsiveness. Snyk offers flexible deployment solutions with higher customer satisfaction and reliable support, making it favored for its consistent deployment approach.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix has cost-effective setups, appreciated by cost-sensitive buyers with a good ROI over time. Snyk demands a higher initial investment but justifies it with essential features, quicker ROI realization, and user confidence in long-term gains. Its broader features make the higher cost worthwhile for many users.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
The technical support from Acunetix is quite good
Our long-standing association has ensured smooth communication, resulting in favorable support experiences and satisfactory issue resolution.
Snyk allows for scaling across large organizations, accommodating tens of thousands of applications and over 60,000 repositories.
The support program was helpful in addressing it.
It lacks the ability to select branches on its Web UI, forcing users to rely on CLI or CI/CD for that functionality.
The inclusion of AI to remove false positives would be beneficial.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
Snyk is recognized as the cheapest option we have evaluated.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention.
Our integration of Snyk into GitHub allows us to automatically scan codebases and identify issues, which has improved efficiency.
Snyk helps detect vulnerabilities before code moves to production, allowing for integration with DevOps and providing a shift-left advantage by identifying and fixing bugs before deployment.
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
Snyk is a user-friendly security solution that enables users to safely develop and use open source code. Users can create automatic scans that allow them to keep a close eye on their code and prevent bad actors from exploiting vulnerabilities. This enables users to find and remove vulnerabilities soon after they appear.
Benefits of Snyk
Some of the benefits of using Snyk include:
Reviews from Real Users
Snyk is a security platform for developers that stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to integrate with other security solutions and important insights that it can enable users to discover. Snyk enables users to combine its already existing security features with those of other solutions to create far more robust and flexible layers of security than what it can supply on its own. It gives users the ability to dig into the security issues that they may experience. Users are given a clear view of the root causes of these problems. This equips them to address the problem and prevent similar issues in the future.
Cameron G., a security software engineer at a tech company, writes, “The most valuable features are their GitLab and JIRA integrations.The GitLab integration lets us pull projects in pretty easily, so that it's pretty minimal for developers to get it set up. Using the JIRA integration, it's also pretty easy to get the information that is generated, as a result of that GitLab integration, back to our teams in a non-intrusive way and in a workflow that we are already using. Snyk is something of a bridge that we use; we get our projects into it and then get the information out of it. Those two integrations are crucial for us to be able to do that pretty simply.”
Sean M., the chief information security officer of a technology vendor, writes, "From the software composition analysis perspective, it first makes sure that we understand what is happening from a third-party perspective for the particular product that we use. This is very difficult when you are building software and incorporating dependencies from other libraries, because those dependencies have dependencies and that chain of dependencies can go pretty deep. There could be a vulnerability in something that is seven layers deep, and it would be very difficult to understand that is even affecting us. Therefore, Snyk provides fantastic visibility to know, "Yes, we have a problem. Here is where it ultimately comes from." It may not be with what we're incorporating, but something much deeper than that."
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
