Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adobe Web Experience Management vs Oracle WebCenter comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.0
Oracle WebCenter is scalable, adaptable, supports gradual deployment across departments, enhancing business agility and handling large user bases.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.5
Oracle WebCenter streamlines content management, customization, and integration, supporting secure collaboration, scalability, and analytics with other Oracle products.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
2.7
Oracle WebCenter needs improved API functionality, modern UI, competitive pricing, better scalability, and support for newer languages and systems.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Oracle WebCenter users report mixed stability; praised for its database support, but face performance issues and slow bug fixes.
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Oracle WebCenter support receives mixed reviews: praised for excellence, criticized for high costs, delays, and regional access issues.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Oracle WebCenter is expensive but negotiable, with discounts up to 60%, though similar solutions are generally cheaper.
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Web Experience Manage...
Ranking in Customer Experience Management
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle WebCenter
Ranking in Customer Experience Management
23rd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (15th), Web Content Management (7th), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Customer Experience Management category, the mindshare of Adobe Web Experience Management is 4.1%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle WebCenter is 1.7%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Experience Management
 

Featured Reviews

Syed Hasan - PeerSpot reviewer
It has a lot of features, and it is very easy to learn, use, integrate, and manage
It would be better if it also supports some styling. Currently, whenever we have to do design for a particular client according to their brand strategy, it takes a good amount of effort. Adobe never focuses on this area. They say that you design your pages, templates, etc. If they can define common components or a common section of the style sheet so that if you want to have a button by default, you can go and just mention the specifications, such as the color code, and those specifications are automatically followed across the whole site or multiple sites according to the brand strategy. Such functionality will be helpful because currently, it takes a lot of effort to manage them separately. They can increase the number of components in terms of combinations. For example, if I take an image and a text component, currently, Adobe gives you just an image and text component. It should provide multiple versions, such as image, text, and video. That's because, on most of the sites, clients always come up with this combination. They want to have a video. They want to have an image, and they want to have some text. There could be options to have any of the following combinations: * The image on the left, the video on the right, and the text at the bottom. * The image on the left, the video on the right, and the text at the top. * The image in the center, the video on top, and the text at the bottom. If they can come up with such permutations and combinations, it will make the work easier. It will help us in putting out the site in a faster way, instead of us having to do the regular development every time. They can come up with some out-of-the-box components to help you drag and drop a video that will be displayed in a particular player. Currently, some of the features are not available, and we have to customize them. They can look into the top video players that are being used by most of the end-users from a location and provide out-of-the-box components. They can look into the features of YouTube, Vimeo, and other top players.
Mehdi Hasankhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Gives me easy access, connection and compatibility with all of the Oracle products
WebCenter content access has a lot of options and flexibility. At this time, I only see one problem: in the sub-content and channels surrounding Windows 10. It only functions with Windows 7 and Windows 8. All of the operating systems in my company are up-to-date and we are using Windows 10. For whatever reason, you can't use the Oracle content on these platforms at all. This lapse is very bad for my company because I can't change the version of Word and downgrade. Maybe it is just a technical problem. But it is a lot of my problem with this solution currently.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Experience Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
University
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Oracle WebCenter?
WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly.
What needs improvement with Oracle WebCenter?
WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system. Its performance is also not up to the market standard, and its agility and adaptability could be improved.
 

Also Known As

No data available
WebCenter, FatWire
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg, University of Georgia, The University of Auckland, Dalhousie University, KfW Bankengruppe, IG Group, National Australia Bank, Investec, New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT), Swiss Federal Railways (SBB), Singapore Tourism Board, European Southern Observatory (ESO)
Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Web Experience Management vs. Oracle WebCenter and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.