Adobe Workfront vs Airtable comparison

Read 13 Airtable reviews

296 Views
199 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Workfront

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Adobe Workfront and Airtable are competing in the project management space. Adobe Workfront seems to have the upper hand in scalability and collaboration for larger enterprises, while Airtable shines with flexibility and ease of use for smaller teams.

Features: Adobe Workfront provides robust tools for task management, Gantt charts, and customizable dashboards that accommodate complex workflows. Airtable, on the other hand, offers a flexible grid interface, integration capabilities, and powerful templates ideal for dynamic structures.

Room for Improvement: Adobe Workfront could improve by streamlining its initial setup process, enhancing its user interface for a more intuitive experience, and reducing complexity for smaller teams. Airtable might focus on scaling features for larger organizations, offering advanced reporting capabilities, and improving its integration options with enterprise systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Workfront requires thorough integration with existing enterprise systems, offering detailed customer support. Airtable is known for its straightforward setup and strong community support, facilitating rapid deployment and easy learning.

Pricing and ROI: Adobe Workfront's pricing corresponds with its enterprise-level capabilities, reflecting higher setup costs but significant ROI in productivity and oversight. Airtable provides more affordable pricing options, suitable for smaller budgets, and offers immediate ROI with user-friendly solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Workfront vs. Airtable Report (Updated: January 2025).

Adobe Workfront vs. Airtable

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront

Ranking in Project Management Software

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Asset Management (1st)

Airtable

Ranking in Project Management Software

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Product Management Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Adobe Workfront is 3.5%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Airtable is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Graham Sprague

Sr. Manager/Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer at Staples, Inc.

Centralized task management and simplified creative collaboration but interface is inconsistent

Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API. The current setup was not originally designed API-first, leading to some confusion and differences in available functions. Additionally, the low-code environment in Workfront Fusion is beneficial yet sometimes limiting, and it might be more powerful with enhancements.

Read full review

Ashwini Ramanisankar

Airtable Administrator at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

User-friendly, quick implementation, and effortless database creation

The interfaces provided by the company have certainly undergone significant improvements since their earlier versions. The growth and progress have been remarkable. I have personally shared numerous feedback points and observed the prompt implementation of changes within a few months, which is highly commendable. However, I must admit that I have encountered several challenges with their interfaces. In terms of the interface, there are certain improvements I would suggest. For instance, a global search feature is currently absent, which would greatly enhance usability. Additionally, incorporating a search function within automation would be highly beneficial. The current limitation of fifty automation per base is insufficient for our needs and could be expanded. Moreover, there is a need for a longer native time delay in automation to allow for more flexible syncing. Currently, the syncing time is set at approximately three to five minutes, which could be increased for smoother operations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application."

"Monitoring the progress of projects and tasks is very effective."

"Workfront centralizes the tasks, the assignment of tasks, and documents required to do the work, streamlining communication and information availability, thus improving organization and reducing dependency on decentralized methods like email or servers."

"Workfront is innovative and these were plenty of features that I found valuable while working at Logitech. Workfront had this feature of Project Schedule Templatization. This saves time and effort and even leads to the standardization of processes that are well-assorted. The Intelligent Graphical Interfaces of Workfront allow one to look at a specific type of resource and a specific phase for a specific family of products. You can get quite granular with the data and even zoom in or out of the timeline. It also categorizes projects according to classes and portfolios so that over time, you can more easily understand what are the various metrics involved in producing a specific portfolio Another important feature is Workfront allowing you to validate milestones and investigate the project. This also helped me to understand which projects are performing well and whether it was beneficial to invest in the same. The IT and the app configuration is quite secure and it is one of the benefits. One more valuable feature is the integration of communication systems inside Workfront. This helps you differentiate between normal business emails and project-specific conversations. This is also known as ‘queues’ and I absolutely find this feature extremely powerful."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

"Instead of following everything on email, business users can track everything on Adobe Workfront when the other systems are integrated with it."

"The intake feature is the most valuable in Workfront."

"Feature-wise, I would say that its overall ability to be infinitely customizable is valuable...My experience with the support team has been amazing."

More Adobe Workfront pros

"The product helps us track activities, address complaints, and make improvements."

"The scripting extension enhances the things that you can do with Airtable."

"The relations and multiple-choice options are the most valuable features. For example, if I have one client but multiple projects in the same client, it's much easier to map it with Airtable than if I use a Google Sheet. The relationship between interfaces is a key feature that I use very often."

"Airtable stands out for its exceptional user-friendliness, making it accessible to users of all skill levels. Its intuitive navigation ensures a smooth experience, allowing users to easily explore and comprehend its functionalities. Moreover, Airtable offers powerful automation capabilities that enhance efficiency. One particularly advantageous aspect is the seamless linking of databases, enabling the effortless creation of relational databases. Overall, this feature has proven to be immensely valuable and has been the primary focus of my usage."

"The product helps us track activities, address complaints, and make improvements."

"It is easy to design workflows with, and we don't have to spend tons of money on somebody to write codes."

"It was easy to get started."

"I am impressed with the tool's continuous improvement. Every six months we get to see a completely different product. You can build a new product using no-code applications. We are able to scale up with the product."

More Airtable pros

Cons

"Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API."

"We were having some difficulties creating different kinds of reports and dashboards."

"Sometimes, new users find it a bit difficult to handle Adobe Workfront."

"I have used the product and instantiated it, almost seven years back. The process was fairly complex, however, I don't know if they have changed the same now. But this is something I think, if not addressed can be improved. Another area that needs a little attention, is the change of implementation lead. Back when we had Workfront instantiated, we often had our timeline delayed due to the change in the implementation lead. Now Workfront is under Adobe and, in case, this issue, isn't fixed it should be given due attention. Also, Workfront is a universal tool, which can pose a difficulty for small businesses and companies, who don't have the required time, effort, and knowledge to configure it periodically."

"Sometimes there are glitches when we are reviewing an interactive proof."

"Workfront's reporting capabilities must be improved."

"Our product and graphic designers are working with various Adobe products, but Workfront has a no-frills interface. It's a useful tool with everything we need, but it could be a little more attractive and present information in a polished way. It's a web interface, so it's accessible, but the appearance could be a little slicker."

"The solution's visualization feature could be user-friendly."

More Adobe Workfront cons

"The product's AI feature needs improvement."

"It'd be nice if the record limit of 50,000 record limit per base on pro accounts were substantially higher."

"The product is slow when I try to add data to a table using API. There is also a limit on the databases."

"The template library is huge. I have a few suggestions with respect to that. But to complete automation, I think a bit more documentation around that would be really helpful because there are a lot of features in that which common people explore them less"

"Reporting, specifically anything involving exports, could be improved."

"Some of the issues associated with the tool were related to some misunderstanding regarding the instructions mentioned in the documentation part of the product."

"The tool has changed the syncing time between the tables which has affected our multiple systems. I would like the product to add more calls per second to the API. It also needs to improve data storage. The tool starts to have problems after having huge amounts of data."

"The product should improve the Spanish translation."

More Airtable cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of users. The product's pricing is okay for personal use. For large organizations, pricing can be a pain. As per the first-rate plan, you need to pay 10 USD per user. The next plan would cost you 20 USD per user. If you are looking for enterprise-type plans, then you need to contact the sales team."

"We are utilizing the free version of the software, which adequately meets most of our requirements. As we explore the higher-end versions, we have noticed that the primary distinctions lie in the number of records and usage limitations. However, the free version offers comprehensive functionality, and the disparity between the free and paid versions is minimal, with only a few minor differences."

"The product is a little bit expensive."

"The product's price is good."

"Airtable's pricing depends on the plan that you're on."

"The product would be expensive for customers with only one application or database."

"The product's price is good."

"For basic usage, Airtable is an open-source tool but if you need premium features like script automation, then you need to pay for it. As my clients provide me access after buying the subscription I do not have much knowledge about pricing."

More Airtable pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

70%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Non Profit

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Workfront?

I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?

Workfront incurs around a hundred thousand plus dollars per year. Licensing is strict, particularly with free accounts, however, it offers flexibility in project access, which could be enhanced fur...

What needs improvement with Workfront?

What do you like most about Airtable?

The product helps us track activities, address complaints, and make improvements.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Airtable?

It is relatively cheap.

What needs improvement with Airtable?

I haven't used it in a while, so I cannot really provide specific areas that need improvement.

Aprimo vs Adobe Workfront

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

Wrike vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 16% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 14% of the time

Smartsheet vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 13% of the time

More Adobe Workfront Competitors

Dovetail vs Airtable

Compared 73% of the time

More Airtable Competitors

Product Reports

Download Adobe Workfront product report

Adobe Workfront

February 2025

Download Airtable product report

February 2025

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM

No data available

Overview

AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.

Adobe

Airtable was founded on the belief that software shouldn't dictate how you work – you should dictate how it works. Our mission is to democratize software creation by enabling anyone to build the software tools that meet their needs. Creators and creatives around the world use Airtable to do everything from cattle tracking to filmmaking, and they have great things to say.

Our team brings experience from building and scaling products touching millions of people at Google, Facebook, Salesforce, Microsoft, Dropbox and other leading technology companies. We take pride in our product, and strive hard to provide the best possible experience for you, even if it requires creating new technologies and design paradigms along the way.

Airtable is an independent, private company headquartered in San Francisco. The company has raised over $63 million in funding from notable investors including: CRV, Caffeinated Capital, Freestyle Capital, Data Collective, Founder Collective, CrunchFund, and Box Group.

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse

Cole Haan, Expedia, BuzzFeed, Medium, Shopify, Box, JetBlue