Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs ShieldX comparison

Akamai and Fortinet are both solutions in the Microsegmentation Software category. Akamai is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while Fortinet is ranked #11. Akamai holds a 24.8% mindshare in MS, compared to Fortinet’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Read 20 Akamai Guardicore Segmentation reviews

7,809 Views
5,076 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ShieldX

Read 4 ShieldX reviews

370 Views
144 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

ShieldX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 14, 2024

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation and ShieldX compete in the network security market with a focus on micro-segmentation and cyber defense. ShieldX seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced threat detection and adaptive security features.

Features: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation offers extensive network visibility, robust micro-segmentation controls, and real-time monitoring, making it ideal for environments demanding deep packet inspection. ShieldX provides adaptive security solutions using AI for enhanced threat detection, automated intelligence for dynamic threat adaptation, and proactive defense mechanisms.

Room for Improvement: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation could improve its automated threat detection, enhance ease of rule configuration, and simplify its user interface. ShieldX might benefit from more extensive integration capabilities, increased customization options for unique environments, and enhanced cloud-native support to broaden its applicability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is noted for its streamlined yet complex deployment with scalable cloud support, backed by strong technical assistance. In contrast, ShieldX offers flexible deployment options with auto-scaling capabilities and proactive customer service, simplifying installation and ensuring responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is viewed as cost-effective with scalable pricing models suited for high-traffic enterprises, promising long-term ROI. ShieldX, despite a higher initial cost, delivers significant ROI through AI-driven security and rapid threat mitigation, with its advanced technology investments justifying the cost in environments requiring proactive defenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. ShieldX Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. ShieldX

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,036 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Ranking in Microsegmentation Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud and Data Center Security (1st), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (11th), Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (5th)

ShieldX

Ranking in Microsegmentation Software

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Microsegmentation Software category, the mindshare of Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is 24.8%, down from 26.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ShieldX is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Microsegmentation Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation	24.8%
ShieldX	1.0%
Other	74.2%

Microsegmentation Software

Featured Reviews

Ken Bauer

Senior Security Analyst at a retailer with 5,001-10,000 employees

Segmentation of legacy systems has protected outdated endpoints and reduces network risk

The best features Akamai Guardicore Segmentation offers make it simple to see all of the connections that are being made to each of the endpoints, and they can be controlled by process and port. The ability to control by process and port helps my team day-to-day because, since there are hundreds of thousands of connections to some of these endpoints, looking at the Reveal Map makes it simple to audit and create rules for what we want to allow. Akamai Guardicore Segmentation has impacted my organization positively because we find it difficult to remove the legacy systems, so it was very important to segment them from the rest of the network to protect them and protect the rest of our network.

Read full review

MichaelProcyshyn

IT Director at park holidays uk

Proactively monitors, blocks, and reports what it has blocked; and self-updates meaning there is zero maintenance

The most valuable feature is the automatic scaling. With its microservices, it scales both up and down, depending on traffic and throughput. The traffic through our website depends on holiday bookings. It's very quiet in November through January, and then our traffic picks up quite rapidly and, at our peak, we will take in excess of a million pounds of business a day through our website. The UI was also one of the huge selling points. My web development manager was blown away with the detail and the granularity that you can get out of the UI. It is a very strong and informative UI, with the amount of data it provides. Uptime on the system has been 648 days and we do very little to it because it self-updates and alerts. It does everything that we need it to do, so the administration side of it is zero. One of the beauties about ShieldX is that it's such a good "fire-and-forget" product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like the centralized management of the firewalls. Until we installed Guardicore Centra, we managed all our firewalls individually, so making changes was complicated, difficult, and time-consuming."

"This tool greatly helps in understanding the footprint of the attacks."

"Application Ring-Fencing and Deception Server, which is basically like a honeypot, are pretty useful features."

"Akamai Guardicore Segmentation has impacted my organization positively because we find it difficult to remove the legacy systems, so it was very important to segment them from the rest of the network to protect them and protect the rest of our network."

"The interface and dashboard are amazing."

"Its deception features are great, providing a rich telemetry of lured origins, and are a great resource for any active defense strategy."

"That is primarily because I've seen increased rules. It's kind of caught us a little off guard. With GuardiCore, I have had to deal with their technical support and engineering team in Israel. They are amazing. They are very quick to adapt."

"Guardicore Centra offers the best coverage specifically in backward compatibility with legacy operating systems."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation pros

"The Adaptive Intention Engine is fantastic. It allows us to develop security policies using the language of our internal customers. It's machine-learning applied to security workflows. That allows us to much more easily construct the policies that will protect those workflows."

"It has helped us tighten our security posture. Now, staff can only access things that they should be accessing."

"The most valuable feature is the automatic scaling. With its microservices, it scales both up and down, depending on traffic and throughput."

"ShieldX has been designed from the very beginning to work well in cloud environments. It understands autoscaling, automation, and auto-configuration. These are the things which are important in today's operating environment."

"The UI was also one of the huge selling points. My web development manager was blown away with the detail and the granularity that you can get out of the UI. It is a very strong and informative UI, with the amount of data it provides."

"We were able to see what devices are talking to each other, giving us more visibility."

"...It takes the exact same policies that you would apply to your on-premise environment and enables you to simply apply them to the cloud. It becomes one policy for both on-prem and for the cloud."

Cons

"Supports become difficult when it's for a big organization. For a small organization, medium organization, it still makes sense, however, for a big organization, it makes life difficult."

"In our version, when using the terminal server, we cannot exclude user tasks for each session."

"The product needs a few features like enhanced user policies and payload-level inspection to improve the offering."

"The dashboard needs improvement. It should be more flexible so that I can easily see what I want or need to see."

"Incident tagging could be improved. Other vendors offer semi-automatic tagging, which Guardicore doesn't yet have."

"Guardicore Centra should incorporate automation so that we don't require to write custom scripts and APIs. The tool also has limitations on rules where it allows only sixty thousand rules. Our clients have also commented that there are too many manual clicks and effort to do changes. I think that the incorporation of automation can help our clients make changes with confidence and without the possibility of human error."

"The long-term management of the security policies could be improved with some kind of automation platform, something like Chef or Puppet or Ansible, to help you manage the policies after day-one... to then manage the policies and changes to those policies, going forward, through some type of automation process is not turning out to be really easy."

"Akamai Guardicore Segmentation can be improved because keeping it up to date is difficult since it is SaaS-based and updates are not on a regular schedule; I have to reach out to my contact to ask them to update to a newer version, and it would be helpful if updates were on a regular cadence so that I would not have to remember to ask them."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation cons

"With any kind of tool like ShieldX, where you're in the cloud instead of a traditional firewall, you're using CPU resources in those environments to provide the protection. So there's a cost associated with CPU resources. I'm pressing upon them to make the product much more efficient and use less CPUs to do the same thing."

"There should be a bit more customer care, with regular review meetings on it or regular reports. It would be nice to have a quarterly or biannual review of what ShieldX has blocked."

"I would like better reports and in-depth reporting."

"They need to be consistent in performance and capabilities over time, given the fact that this is new and I want to see where this goes in the next year or so. As the vendor continues to evolve and add future functionality, we want to make sure that we are still keeping up with the integrations, etc. Time will be the key factor here. The proper support for some of the latest technologies, Docker containers, etc. They need to keep up with threat landscape, so we will see how the security get layered. This is what we are going to be keeping an eye on."

"We are having some issues with their LDAP and integrating it with the Active Directory. We can't seem to set it up."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is expensive."

"The solution is reasonably priced and I would rate it a six out of ten. The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"Compared to the pricing we were seeing from both Illumio and Edgewise, Guardicore was very competitive."

"The customer would complain about the cost."

"GuardiCore has made some new changes to the license now. We've seen monthly and annual licenses based on a subscription. We have a few clients that pay anywhere from $25,000 a year."

"Guardicore Centra provides better value for money than NSX, was the other solution that we looked at, which was too expensive for what it does."

"The pricing is too high."

"The price is the same as other products in the market. There's no price argument to choose one or the other product, it will cost the customer approximately the same."

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation pricing and cost advice

"For a three-year deal we paid £55,000 plus tax... But, and this is a big "but," this was over two years ago. ShieldX had only just hit the market. We were the first company in Europe to buy ShieldX."

"We are actually expecting our costs to drop in the coming year, but it is just a matter of the licensing expiring. That is going to happen in the next six months or so. Then, we will start to see a decrease in overall spend."

"For other security professions who are looking for something which is low in cost that does microsegmentation, they should look at ShieldX. It might not be the big name out there, but it does everything that you are looking for in microsegmentation at a very low price."

"ShieldX also enables us to migrate to cloud environments faster. That is an important part of it for sure because it takes the exact same policies that we would apply to our on-premise environment and enables us to simply apply them to the cloud. It becomes one policy for both on-prem and for the cloud."

"We are very happy with the pricing and licensing. It's about getting a site-wide license. One of the challenges that we've had with our previous vendor had been the cost of licensing."

"Security policies are now applied as applications are going up. Because it's automated, we don't have the three to four week delay. The insertion of applications in the cloud for us dropped from an average of three to four weeks to a couple of days."

"ShieldX ensures that we can have the separation needed for our environment to avoid drastically increasing the cost on the licensing side. From this perspective, it's been very positive and helpful."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Microsegmentation Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Guardicore Centra?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that overall everything worked out really well. The pricing was flexible, and it has worked out well with our budget.

See all answers

What do you like most about Guardicore Infection Monkey?

Initially, I liked the telemetry part. But later, we used the microsegmentation features that we were able to deploy and found that they really stood out from other vendors. It allows us to see mi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Guardicore Infection Monkey?

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation can be improved because keeping it up to date is difficult since it is SaaS-based and updates are not on a regular schedule; I have to reach out to my contact to ask ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Illumio vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 39% of the time

VMware NSX vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Secure Workload vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 9% of the time

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 4% of the time

Zero Networks vs Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

Compared 3% of the time

More Akamai Guardicore Segmentation Competitors

Illumio vs ShieldX

Compared 61% of the time

More ShieldX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation

January 2026

Download Akamai Guardicore Segmentation product report

Buyer's Guide

ShieldX

January 2026

Download ShieldX product report

Also Known As

Guardicore Centra, GuardiCore

APEIRO, ShieldX APEIRO

Overview

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation is a software-based microsegmentation solution that provides the simplest, fastest, and most intuitive way to enforce Zero Trust principles. It enables you to prevent malicious lateral movement in your network through precise segmentation policies, visuals of activity within your IT environment, and network security alerts. Akamai Guardicore Segmentation works across your data centers, multicloud environments, and endpoints. It is faster to deploy than infrastructure segmentation approaches and provides you with unparalleled visibility and control of your network.

Akamai

The ShieldX Elastic Security Platform dynamically scales to deliver comprehensive and consistent controls to protect data centers, cloud infrastructure, applications and data no matter where they are or where they go to make the cloud more secure than on-premise deployments. Our frictionless approach leverages agentless technology as well as the ShieldX Adaptive Intention Engine which autonomously translates and enforces intention into a set of comprehensive controls - microsegmentation, firewall, IPS and more - making security the easiest thing you do in the cloud.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

Santander, Frontier Airlines, OpenLink, Intermountain Healthcare, Cellcom, BancoBASE

Iowa State University

Buyer's Guide

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. ShieldX

January 2026

Free Report: Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. ShieldX

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. ShieldX and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. ShieldX report.

See our list of best Microsegmentation Software vendors.

We monitor all Microsegmentation Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.