Alfabet FastLane vs LeanIX comparison

"The solution has provided us with a view of the truth in terms of our application portfolio."

"The solution has a very useful assessment tool that automatically populates from input data to produce a detailed analysis of customer's environments."

"Interfaces well with downstream systems of data."

"One of the product's most valuable features is its ability to configure hardware devices."

"For the reporting capabilities, LeanIX provides dashboards for different levels, including CXO dashboards. There are plenty of dashboards for reporting."

"I like LeanIX's ease of use in general."

"My favorite feature of LeanIX is its ability to induct attribute-driven surveys."

"The ability to import data and generate reports from it. That's where its power lies."

"The most valuable features include the reporting capabilities and the LeanIX Academy's educational resources."

"The initial setup is challenging because it relies on information from different stakeholders."

"Does a poor job of being able to allocate detailed costings to components within the network."

"They could include a combination of LeanIX and some modeling extensions."

"LeanIX should improve its support services."

"The initial setup has room for improvement."

"The modeling could be improved."

"I think the tool's main issue might be direct integrations."

"Report generation could be more detailed. There are some shortcomings when creating reports. We can't create tag-based reports or go beyond basic technical reports."

"The whole integration architecture view of interfaces/data exchange could be improved."

"I am with a third-party so am not privy to costs."

"The solution's pricing is based on a licensing model that is competitive and in line with other products."

"It cost me $91,000 a year for 300 applications. For any enterprise, 300 applications are minimal, as many have well over 1,000 applications."

"As the tool is cloud-based, its cost is more affordable."

"I would rate the pricing a one out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The tool needs to include more flexible licensing options. We do not use the tool all the time. So pricing should be considered only when we use the tool."

"There is a sweet spot of where they need to be on pricing right now. They could go up a little bit in pricing, but it has to do with the cost savings, and it has to do with the practitioners using it. I use it where I get cost savings and I can justify it, but they probably have the ability to flex a 10% up channel on their sales on that. So, they could increase their settle price, not their offering price, when they sell. They can probably hold that up a little bit higher than it is because there are cost savings that we can drive from it."

"The pricing is very good. We definitely get good value for the money."

"LeanIX uses application-based account licensing, where the cost is multiplied by the number of applications in the software implementation."