Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alluvio AppResponse vs LiveAction LiveNX comparison

Riverbed and BlueCat are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Riverbed is ranked #60 with an average rating of 8.0, while BlueCat is ranked #50 with an average rating of 7.0. Riverbed holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to BlueCat’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.
Alluvio AppResponse
Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews
  • 577 Views
  • 365 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
LiveAction LiveNX
Read 8 LiveAction LiveNX reviews
  • 1,355 Views
  • 983 Comparison Views
77% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and LiveAction LiveNX compete in network performance monitoring. Alluvio AppResponse is favored in pricing and support, while LiveAction LiveNX leads in features due to its comprehensive capabilities.

Features: Alluvio AppResponse provides in-depth network visibility, packet-level analysis, and efficient diagnostics tools. LiveAction LiveNX offers extensive network visualization, advanced analytics, and real-time application monitoring, surpassing its competitor in feature richness.

Room for Improvement: Alluvio AppResponse can enhance its visualization capabilities and analytics depth and streamline its interface for ease of use. LiveAction LiveNX can benefit from simplifying initial setup, improving cost-effectiveness, and offering more flexible pricing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Alluvio AppResponse is straightforward to deploy and is supported by responsive customer service. LiveAction LiveNX features scalable deployment with dedicated support but requires more extensive initial configuration.

Pricing and ROI: Alluvio AppResponse offers competitive pricing with rapid ROI due to its economical cost-value balance. LiveAction LiveNX demands a higher initial investment but delivers favorable ROI from its feature-rich capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. LiveAction LiveNX Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. LiveAction LiveNX
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
60th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (47th)
LiveAction LiveNX
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
50th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (48th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.7%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmet Kilic - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels
I rate Alluvio AppResponse 10 out of 10. If you work for a financial company especially, you probably face problems on the application side. The problem is easy to identify, but you need to determine the root cause. You can solve issues easily via AppResponse because it shows you all the details of your transactions so you can see the real problem in the database, network, software, etc. For example, you can find the solution easily if you create the right dashboard on your site. If you can't find the problem, you can observe or investigate PCAP.
Read full review
Mahesh Doshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Very good reporting and alerting abilities but inadequate enhancement support
Before choosing the solution, it is important to rank your requirements from high to low priority. The solution has a lot of features but at a high price. If you will only use 30% of the solution to meet your requirements, then it would be better for you to explore other products. Find the solution that best fulfills your requirements. The solution itself is great. If I could use it properly, then I would rate it a seven out of ten. Unfortunately, support is a factor when determining usability or cost effectiveness. We did not receive the needed support so had to stop using the solution. For that reason, my overall rating for the solution is a five out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It provides us with complete visibility of every packet."
"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."
"AppResponse is a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility into applications at all levels, from Layer 1 to Layer 7. We can trace all those sections: physical, IP, transport, presentation, application, etc. It gives us the full picture."
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."
"Riverbed's product is a superb product."
"With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."
"It's a stable product. Riverbed has invested a significant amount of research and development into it, so it's a solid tool overall."
"When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,"
More Alluvio AppResponse pros
"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."
"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."
"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."
"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."
"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."
"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."
"The product has a very good graphical interface."
"Its analytical capability is really good."
 

Cons

"The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually."
"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."
"The initial setup is straightforward, but you have to know a little about the product. It's not for everybody to just plug and play. If you know how the solution is implemented then it is straightforward."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
"They need to better integrate with products and solutions from different vendors."
"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance."
"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."
"Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems."
More Alluvio AppResponse cons
"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."
"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."
"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."
"They need to create a more simplified UI."
"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."
"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."
"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."
"The only downside to this software is the price."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is costly for small and medium businesses."
"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."
"The solution is no more expensive than other products."
"It's very expensive."
"We use the free version."
"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...
See all answers
What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?
The product has a very good graphical interface.
See all answers
What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?
The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers. Most of these analytical packages have the same ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?
Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible ability to provide granular details about the traffic passing through an interface on ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 31% of the time
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 25% of the time
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 23% of the time
OP5 Monitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
OP5 Monitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 21% of the time
More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors
ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 23% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 17% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 11% of the time
NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 9% of the time
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs LiveAction LiveNX Logo
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs LiveAction LiveNX
Compared 9% of the time
More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
Alluvio AppResponse reportDownload Alluvio AppResponse product report
Buyer's Guide
LiveAction LiveNX
April 2025
LiveAction LiveNX reportDownload LiveAction LiveNX product report
 

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
LiveNX
 

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

BlueCat
 

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. LiveAction LiveNX
April 2025
Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. LiveAction LiveNX
Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. LiveAction LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. LiveAction LiveNX report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.