Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alluvio AppResponse vs LiveAction LiveNX comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.8
Alluvio AppResponse customer service is mixed, with responsive sales but inconsistent technical support, especially during implementation.
Sentiment score
6.7
LiveAction LiveNX customer service receives mixed reviews, citing both excellent support and challenges with responsiveness and satisfaction.
Right now, it's maybe like a six out of ten due to recent changes in corporate structure and teams.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.1
Alluvio AppResponse struggles with integration, navigation, support, AI features, pricing, and performance monitoring, causing user frustration.
Sentiment score
4.9
LiveAction LiveNX is criticized for high costs, limited API integrations, and demands for UI improvements and better support.
The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.6
Alluvio AppResponse is highly scalable, favored by large enterprises with diverse models, despite being costlier for smaller businesses.
Sentiment score
7.6
LiveAction LiveNX scales effectively for large networks, handling increased traffic and user growth without performance issues or resource strain.
It can be adjusted with additional software licensing based on the environment's needs.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Alluvio AppResponse is costly, yet valued for data quality, suitable for medium-large enterprises with competitive government pricing.
No sentiment score available
On the government side, pricing is pretty competitive.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.6
Alluvio AppResponse is highly stable and reliable, with no major issues, earning high ratings for performance and usability.
No sentiment score available
LiveAction LiveNX experiences mixed stability; some praise its reliability, while others note occasional crashes, especially with older versions.
Riverbed has invested a significant amount of research and development into it, so it's a solid tool overall.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.7
Alluvio AppResponse provides detailed monitoring, protocol analytics, and insights into network performance, aiding IT teams in proactive decision-making.
Sentiment score
7.8
LiveAction LiveNX provides real-time network monitoring, visual analytics, and robust alerting for efficient SD-WAN management and capacity planning.
You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring.
 

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Premium Analytics
Sponsored
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
58th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Alluvio AppResponse
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
48th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (36th)
LiveAction LiveNX
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
40th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (41st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Juniper Mist Premium Analytics is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

ALEXANDRE VIANNA - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a single dashboard, but is expensive
We use this solution to manage our mission environment The single dashboard is a valuable feature.  The technical support needs improvement. The initial setup is straightforward. The solution is expensive. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.  Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of…
Ahmet Kilic - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels
I rate Alluvio AppResponse 10 out of 10. If you work for a financial company especially, you probably face problems on the application side. The problem is easy to identify, but you need to determine the root cause. You can solve issues easily via AppResponse because it shows you all the details of your transactions so you can see the real problem in the database, network, software, etc. For example, you can find the solution easily if you create the right dashboard on your site. If you can't find the problem, you can observe or investigate PCAP.
Mahesh Doshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Very good reporting and alerting abilities but inadequate enhancement support
Before choosing the solution, it is important to rank your requirements from high to low priority. The solution has a lot of features but at a high price. If you will only use 30% of the solution to meet your requirements, then it would be better for you to explore other products. Find the solution that best fulfills your requirements. The solution itself is great. If I could use it properly, then I would rate it a seven out of ten. Unfortunately, support is a factor when determining usability or cost effectiveness. We did not receive the needed support so had to stop using the solution. For that reason, my overall rating for the solution is a five out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Mist Premium Analytics?
We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points.
What do you like most about Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
AppResponse is a little expensive, but the cost depends on your configuration and storage. It was about $200,000 for ...
What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems. Alluvio AppResponse shoul...
What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?
The product has a very good graphical interface.
What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?
The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to b...
What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?
Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible abilit...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
LiveNX
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. LiveAction LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.