Alteryx Designer vs Dataloader.io comparison

"Alteryx Designer's user interface is great, as it is very user-friendly."

"We use Alteryx Designer for analytics. It's quite helpful because once we set it up, we don't have to manually update or process data repeatedly. It saves time, especially for financial reporting, which is typically done monthly or quarterly. Once we set it up initially, we only need to make occasional updates if necessary."

"Alteryx is quite easy to use, learn, and understand as a product."

"I like Alteryx Designer's drag-and-drop feature, where you drag a component, configure it and quickly run it."

"The solution's ability to hold a huge amount of data in its memory is significant."

"Alteryx Designer is easier to use for machine learning models. However, I am not very good at Python scripts which you will need to make the machine learning scripts."

"Workflow automation, in general, is valuable."

"Alteryx Designer offers a drag-and-drop interface, making it highly user-friendly. Unlike Python and Apache Airflow, which require coding, Alteryx allows users to accomplish tasks without any programming knowledge. Its simplicity makes it accessible to anyone, even those without coding experience, and this ease of use is one of Alteryx's key advantages."

"I find DataLoader's ability to easily integrate with external keys valuable, which is a bit more challenging with DBM."

"DataLoader is cost-effective since it is free."

"he product’s most valuable feature is ease of access."

"Sometimes, while getting data from a third-party product, the solution works slowly."

"Based on my experience, the tool could be improved by providing sample reports or pre-configured workflows tailored to specific industries, like finance. It needs to integrate an AI chatbot as well."

"Its cost can sometimes be a drawback."

"Alteryx's data science and machine learning capabilities are where it loses out to DataIQ."

"The actual usage part of it needs to be explained more. It's too vague right now."

"When it comes to the pivoting part, the drill-through option is not there in Alteryx."

"It is challenging to view the data using Alteryx Designer."

"Its price can be improved. It is too expensive for our country. Because of its high price, we can't sell Alteryx Designer in this region. We used to be their reseller partner. There is also an additional cost for automating the data and running the flows, which makes it even more expensive. It will be very good if they can let users automate the data for free. Other solutions like Tableau provide this feature for free."

"We need help with large data migrations. It only works well for a few thousand records or less than a million records."

"Dataloader has limitations, including constraints with file sizes and transactions. Additionally, at times it can be slow, and when integrating DBM, we find it more complex than Dataloader."

"DataLoader has limitations, including constraints with file sizes and transactions."

"Each license is something like $4,000."

"I rate the price of Alteryx Designer as a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten is a highly cheap product."

"It is too expensive for our country. We are a small country, so it is too difficult to sell this solution. With Alteryx Designer, if you want to automate the data and run the flows, you have to pay more money. We were trying to automate the flows, and we found out that people have to pay 600 more for this feature, which makes it even more expensive. We are a partner for Tableau, and we are working with Tableau Prep, which is like a mini Alteryx. In Tableau Prep, you can drag and drop and make new connections with the different data sources. You can make all the connections. You can also publish a source. You don't have to pay more money with Tableau. You pay like $5 per user per month to access it."

"The tool is priced high."

"The pricing is bit expensive."

"Alteryx Designer is an expensive solution."

"The licenses are expensive, making it difficult to consider acquiring additional licenses to the existing ones."

"The solution is expensive. It has license fees, which are renewable every year."

"The product is inexpensive and economical."